The open field test (OFT) is one of the main methods used for the estimation of behavioral indices and emotionality levels in animals. This test is widely used in toxicological and pharmacological studies. The question of whether the arena shape influences the results of testing remained open. This is why we compared the results of the mentioned test using one and the same species of laboratory animals (rats), identical conditions of testing, and arenas of nearly the same area but of a round or square shape. Significant differences were found in only two examined parameters, frequency of realization of the burrow reflex and intensity of “internal” horizontal motor activity; other indices showed nearly no considerable differences. Thus, it can be concluded that the results of behavioral studies carried out under the above two conditions are rather similar to each other in their adequacy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. S. Hall and E. L. Ballachey, “A study of the rat’s behavior in a field: a contribution to method in comparative psychology”, Univ. California Publ. Psychol., 6, 1-12 (1932).
S. K. Kasymova, “Anxiety-related behavior of rats and its dependence on the illumination regimen,” Sovr. Probl. Nauki Obraz., 2, 45-47 (2006).
V. C. Careau, O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds, G. Ordonez, et al., “Are voluntary wheel running and open-field behavior correlated in mice? Different answers from comparative and artificial selection approaches,” Behav. Genet., 42, 830-844 (2012).
L. Ricceri, A. Venerosi, F. Capone, et al., “Developmental neurotoxicity of organophosphorous pesticides: fetal and neonatal exposure to chlorpyrifos alters sex-specific behaviors at adulthood in mice,” Toxicol. Sci., 1, No. 93, 105-113 (2006).
N. J. Bridges and N. J. Starkey, “Sex differences in Mongolian gerbils in four tests of anxiety,” Physiol. Behav., 83, No. 1, 119-127 (2004).
D. Eilam, “Open-field behavior withstands drastic changes in arena size,” Behav. Brain Res., 142, 53-62 (2003).
G. Lupfer-Johnson, K. L. Hanson, L. E. Edwards, et al., “Social cues influence foraging in dwarf hamsters (Phodopus campbelli),” J. Comp. Psychol., 123, No. 2, 226-229 (2009).
H. Richendrеfer, S. D. Pelkowski, R. M. Colwill, and R. Créton, “Developmental sub-chronic exposure to chlorpyrifos reduces anxiety-related behavior in zebrafish larvae,” Neurotoxicol. Teratol., 4, No. 34, 458-465 (2012).
S. C. Stanford, “The Open Field Test: reinventing the wheel,” J. Psychopharmacol., 21, 134-135 (2007).
R. N. Walsh and R. A. Cummins, “The Open-Field Test: a critical review,” Psychol. Bull., 83, 482-504 (1976).
J. Bureš, O. Burešova, and J. P. Huston, Techniques and Basic Experiments for the Study of Brain and Behavior [in Russian], Vissh. Shkola, Moskow (1991), pp. 119-122.
G. Genaro and W. R. Schmidek, “Exploratory activity of rats in three different environments,” Ethology, 106, 849-859 (2000).
Y. Hayashi, S. Sogabe, Y. Hattori, and J. Tanaka, “Anxiolytic and hypnotic effects in mice of roasted coffee bean volatile compounds,” Neurosci. Lett., 531, No. 2, 166-169 (2012).
B. Kumar, A. Jindal, D. K. Pandey, et al., “Antidepressant and anxiolytic-like effects of 4n, a novel 5-HT3 receptor antagonist using behaviour based rodent models,” Ind. J. Exp. Biol., 50, No. 9, 625-632 (2012).
Z. Zhang, P. Fei, J. Mu, et al., “Hippocampal expression of aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator 2 and neuronal PAS domain protein 4 in a rat model of depression,” Neurol. Sci., 35, No. 2, 277-282 (2013).
C. López-Granero, F. Cañadas, D. Cardona et al., “Chlorpyrifos-, diisopropylphosphorofluoridate-, and parathion-induced behavioral and oxidative stress effects: are they mediated by analogous mechanisms of action?” Toxicol. Sci., 131, No. 1, 206-216 (2013).
B. R. Mullen, E. Khialeeva, and D. B. Hoffman, “Decreased reelin expression and organophosphate pesticide exposure alters mouse behavior and brain morphology,” ASN Neuro., 5, No 1, 27-42 (2013).
Y. Salyha, “Biological effects assessment of chlorpyrifos and some aspects of its neurotoxicity,” Visn. Lviv Univ. Biol. Ser., 54, 3-14 (2010).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grabovskaya, S.V., Salyha, Y.T. Do Results of the Open Field Test Depend on the Arena Shape?. Neurophysiology 46, 376–380 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-014-9458-x
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-014-9458-x