Skip to main content
Log in

Do Results of the Open Field Test Depend on the Arena Shape?

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

The open field test (OFT) is one of the main methods used for the estimation of behavioral indices and emotionality levels in animals. This test is widely used in toxicological and pharmacological studies. The question of whether the arena shape influences the results of testing remained open. This is why we compared the results of the mentioned test using one and the same species of laboratory animals (rats), identical conditions of testing, and arenas of nearly the same area but of a round or square shape. Significant differences were found in only two examined parameters, frequency of realization of the burrow reflex and intensity of “internal” horizontal motor activity; other indices showed nearly no considerable differences. Thus, it can be concluded that the results of behavioral studies carried out under the above two conditions are rather similar to each other in their adequacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. S. Hall and E. L. Ballachey, “A study of the rat’s behavior in a field: a contribution to method in comparative psychology”, Univ. California Publ. Psychol., 6, 1-12 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. K. Kasymova, “Anxiety-related behavior of rats and its dependence on the illumination regimen,” Sovr. Probl. Nauki Obraz., 2, 45-47 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. C. Careau, O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds, G. Ordonez, et al., “Are voluntary wheel running and open-field behavior correlated in mice? Different answers from comparative and artificial selection approaches,” Behav. Genet., 42, 830-844 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. L. Ricceri, A. Venerosi, F. Capone, et al., “Developmental neurotoxicity of organophosphorous pesticides: fetal and neonatal exposure to chlorpyrifos alters sex-specific behaviors at adulthood in mice,” Toxicol. Sci., 1, No. 93, 105-113 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. N. J. Bridges and N. J. Starkey, “Sex differences in Mongolian gerbils in four tests of anxiety,” Physiol. Behav., 83, No. 1, 119-127 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Eilam, “Open-field behavior withstands drastic changes in arena size,” Behav. Brain Res., 142, 53-62 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Lupfer-Johnson, K. L. Hanson, L. E. Edwards, et al., “Social cues influence foraging in dwarf hamsters (Phodopus campbelli),” J. Comp. Psychol., 123, No. 2, 226-229 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Richendrеfer, S. D. Pelkowski, R. M. Colwill, and R. Créton, “Developmental sub-chronic exposure to chlorpyrifos reduces anxiety-related behavior in zebrafish larvae,” Neurotoxicol. Teratol., 4, No. 34, 458-465 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. C. Stanford, “The Open Field Test: reinventing the wheel,” J. Psychopharmacol., 21, 134-135 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. R. N. Walsh and R. A. Cummins, “The Open-Field Test: a critical review,” Psychol. Bull., 83, 482-504 (1976).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Bureš, O. Burešova, and J. P. Huston, Techniques and Basic Experiments for the Study of Brain and Behavior [in Russian], Vissh. Shkola, Moskow (1991), pp. 119-122.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Genaro and W. R. Schmidek, “Exploratory activity of rats in three different environments,” Ethology, 106, 849-859 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Hayashi, S. Sogabe, Y. Hattori, and J. Tanaka, “Anxiolytic and hypnotic effects in mice of roasted coffee bean volatile compounds,” Neurosci. Lett., 531, No. 2, 166-169 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. B. Kumar, A. Jindal, D. K. Pandey, et al., “Antidepressant and anxiolytic-like effects of 4n, a novel 5-HT3 receptor antagonist using behaviour based rodent models,” Ind. J. Exp. Biol., 50, No. 9, 625-632 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Z. Zhang, P. Fei, J. Mu, et al., “Hippocampal expression of aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator 2 and neuronal PAS domain protein 4 in a rat model of depression,” Neurol. Sci., 35, No. 2, 277-282 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. C. López-Granero, F. Cañadas, D. Cardona et al., “Chlorpyrifos-, diisopropylphosphorofluoridate-, and parathion-induced behavioral and oxidative stress effects: are they mediated by analogous mechanisms of action?” Toxicol. Sci., 131, No. 1, 206-216 (2013).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. B. R. Mullen, E. Khialeeva, and D. B. Hoffman, “Decreased reelin expression and organophosphate pesticide exposure alters mouse behavior and brain morphology,” ASN Neuro., 5, No 1, 27-42 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Salyha, “Biological effects assessment of chlorpyrifos and some aspects of its neurotoxicity,” Visn. Lviv Univ. Biol. Ser., 54, 3-14 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu. T. Salyha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grabovskaya, S.V., Salyha, Y.T. Do Results of the Open Field Test Depend on the Arena Shape?. Neurophysiology 46, 376–380 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-014-9458-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-014-9458-x

Keywords

Navigation