Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Benchmarking Analysis of Spanish Commercial Airports. A Comparison Between SMOP and DEA Ranking Methods

  • Published:
Networks and Spatial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we use the flexibility of Surface Measure of Overall Performance (SMOP) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) ranking methods to analyze the relative performance of each individual Spanish airport, and to fully rank both efficient, as well as inefficient airports. Most airports have previously compared their efficiency according to the results of some partial productivity ratios. However, this approach does not provide a good understanding of the overall performance of the airports. For this reason, we use six different ranking approaches in order to fully rank the performance of Spanish airports. The first and second approaches are based on the SMOP obtained by nine complementary partial performance indicators. The third approach involves the evaluation of a cross-efficiency matrix, in which airports are evaluated according to its weights and their rivals' weights. The fourth and fifth approaches rank the airports' performance through the exclusion of the airport being analyzed, and are known as super-efficiency models in the DEA parlance. And finally the sixth approach is based on the analysis of the virtual airport and the comparison of the rest of the airports with this “champion performer”. Finally, in this paper, we try to fill the gap between the performance based on the partial productivity indicators and the proposed ranking methods. To this purpose, we calculate non-parametric statistical tests to verify the consistency between the ranking obtained from each method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott M, Wu S (2002) Total factor productivity and efficiency of Australian airports. Aust Econ Rev 35:244–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler N, Berechman J (2001) Measuring airport quality from the airlines' viewpoint: an application of data envelopment analysis. Transp Policy 8:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler N, Friedman L, Sinuany-Stern Z (2002) Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. Eur J Oper Res 140:249–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali A, Seiford LM (1993) The mathematical programming approach to efficiency analysis. In: Fried HO, Lovell CAK, Schmidt SS (eds) The measurement of productive efficiency: techniques and applications. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen P, Petersen NC (1993) A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 39:1261–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH, Griffin JM, Rich DP (1995) Airline deregulation: the cost pieces of the puzzle. Int Econ Rev 36(1):245–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazargan M, Vasigh B (2003) Size versus efficiency: a case study of US commercial airports. J Air Transp Manag 9:187–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogetoft P (1995) Incentives and productivity measurements. Int J Prod Econ 39:67–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogetoft P (1997) DEA-Based yardstick competition: the optimality of best practice regulation. Annals of Operations Research 73:277–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogetoft P (2000) DEA and activity planning under asymmetric information. Journal of Productivity Analysis 13:7–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogetoft P, Hougaard JL (2004) Super efficiency evaluations based on potential slack. Eur J Oper res 152:14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Button KJ, Haynes K, Stough R (1998) Flying into the future: air transport policy in the European union. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves DW, Christensen LR, Tretheway MW, Windle RJ (1987) An assessment of the efficiency effects of US airline deregulation via an international comparison. In: Bailey EE (ed) Public regulation: new perspectives on institutions and policies. MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Haag S, Jaska P, Semple J (1992) Sensitivity of efficiency classification in the additive model of data envelopment analysis. Int J Syst Sci 23:789–798

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper W, Lewin AY, Seiford LM (1994) Data envelopment analysis. Theory, methodology and applications. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin ATH, Siong LE (2001) Airport performance: a comparative study between Changi airport and airports in the New York–New Jersey metropolitan area. Paper presented at World Conference on Transportation Research, Seoul

  • Coelli T (1996) A guide to DEAP version 2.1: a data envelopment analysis (computer) program. CEPA Working Paper 96/08. Centre for efficiency and productivity analysis, University of New England, Armidale

  • Coelli T, Rao DSP, Battese GE (1998) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper W, Sieford L, Tone K (2000) Date envelopment analysis. A comprehensive text with models, applications, reference and DEA–solver software. Kluwer, Norwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Costas-Centivany CM (1999) Spain's airport infrastructure: adaptations to liberalization and privatization. J Transp Geogr 7:215–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doganis RS, Graham A (1987) Airport management: the role of performance indicators. Transport studies group, Polytechnic of Central London, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Doganis RS, Graham A (1995) The economic performance of European airports. Research Report 3, Department of air transport. College of Aeronautics. Cranfield University. Bedford

  • Doyle JR, Green R (1994) Efficiency and cross-efficiency in data envelopment analysis: derivatives, meanings and uses. J Oper Res Soc 45(5):567–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Emorouznejad A, Thanassolis E (1997) An extensive bibliography of data envelopment analysis (DEA), Vol. 3, Supplement 1. Working Paper 258, Business School, University of Warwick

  • Farrel MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc A120:253–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis GAJ, Fry J, Humphreys I (2001) An international survey of performance measurement in airports, Open University Working Paper

  • Francis G, Humphreys I, Fry J (2002) The benchmarking of airport performance. J Air Transp Manag 8:239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillen D, Lall A (1997) Developing measures of airport productivity and performance: an application of data envelopment analysis. Transp Res E 33(4):261–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys I, Francis G (2002) Performance measurement: a review of airports. International Journal of Transport Management 1:79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JC, Roman C (2001) An application of DEA to measure the efficiency of Spanish airports prior to privatization. J Air Transp Manag 7:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison S, Winston C (1995) The evolution of the airline industry. Brookings Institution, Washington

  • Oum TH, Yu C, Fu X (2003) A comparative analysis of productivity performance of the world's major airports: summary report of the ATRS global airport benchmarking research report-2002. J Air Transp Manag 9:285–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco RR, Fernandes E (2003) Managerial efficiency of Brazilian airports. Transp Res 37A:667–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker D (1997) The performance of BAA under privatisation and regulation, Centre for the Study of Regulated Industries, Occasional Paper no. 8.

  • Parker D (1999) The performance of BAA before and after privatization. J Trans Econ Policy 33:133–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Pels E, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P (2001) Relative efficiency of European airports. Transp Policy 8:183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pels E, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P (2003) Inefficiencies and scale economies of European airport operations. Transp Res Part 39E:341–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis J (2000) An analysis of the operational efficiency of major airports in the United States. J Oper Manag 18:335–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford LM (1994) A DEA bibliography (1978–1992). In: Charnes A, Cooper W, Lewin AY, Seiford LM (eds.), Data envelopment analysis, theory, methodology and applications. Kluwer Academic. Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiford LM, Thrall RM (1990) Recent developments in data envelopment analysis: the mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis. J Econom 46:7–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford LM, Zhu J (1998) Stability regions for maintaining efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 108:127–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford LM, Zhu J (1999) Infeasibility of super-efficiency data envelopment analysis models. INFOR 37(2):174–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton TR, Silkman RH, Hogan AJ (1986) Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions. In: Silkman RH (ed.), Measuring efficiency: an assessment of data envelopment analysis. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, pp. 73–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Stasinopoulos D (1992) The second aviation package of the European community. J Transp Econ Policy 26:83–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Stasinopoulos D (1993) The third phase of liberalization in community aviation and the need for supplementary measures. J Transp Econ Policy 27:323–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi T (1999) Data envelopment analysis non-parametric ranking test and index measurement: slack-adjusted DEA and an application to Japanese agriculture cooperatives. Omega Int J Manag Sci 27:315–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tronti L (1998) Benchmarking employment performance and labour market policies. Final Report of the Employment Observatory Research Network, Brussels: European Commission

  • Vincent D, Stasinopoulos D (1990) The aviation policy of the European community. J Transp Econ Policy 24:95–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson PW (1993) Detecting outliers in deterministic nonparametric frontier models with multiple outputs. J Bus Econ Stat 11:319–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J (1996) Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 90:451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Economic Analysis, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, G.C. 35017, Spain

    Juan Carlos Martín & Concepción Román

Authors
  1. Juan Carlos Martín
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Concepción Román
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Carlos Martín.

Additional information

This paper has been written with the financial support of the Research Program of the University of Las Palmas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martín, J.C., Román, C. A Benchmarking Analysis of Spanish Commercial Airports. A Comparison Between SMOP and DEA Ranking Methods. Netw Spat Econ 6, 111–134 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-006-7696-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-006-7696-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation