Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical outcomes in male patients with lactotroph adenomas who required pituitary surgery: a retrospective single center study

  • Published:
Pituitary Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Lactotroph adenomas (LA) are the most frequently encountered pituitary tumors. Although more frequently observed in women, LAs in men were recently included in a more aggressive category regardless of histological grading, by the WHO. We aimed to perform a rigorous retrospective review of a single center’s pre-operative evaluation, patient characteristics and outcomes of male LAs patients requiring pituitary surgery.

Methods

A retrospective review, over 11 years, of patients who underwent resection of a pituitary adenoma at a single center was conducted. Predictors of persistent disease in male LAs patients along with a comparison to predictors of silent corticotroph adenomas (SCAs) patients who also underwent surgery at the center was also conducted.

Results

Thirty-one male patients with LAs were identified. When compared to SCAs patients, LAs male patients were younger (41 vs. 50 years of age, p = 0.01). Men with LAs had more invasive tumors (75% vs. 44.7% p = 0.02). More LAs in men had residual tumor after surgery than patients with SCA (92.6% vs. 42.1%, p < 0.001). Male patients with LAs and patients with SCA had similar rates of requiring additional surgery (28.9% vs. 24.1%, p = NS) and radiation therapy (18.4% vs. 19.4%, p = NS).

Conclusions

High rates of DA resistance, invasive tumors and postoperative residual disease in male patients with LA who required surgery are shown. Surgery improved optic chiasm compression, PRL level and central hypogonadism but, not surprisingly, failed to normalize other pituitary hormones and/or eliminate need for DA therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Daly AF et al (2006) High prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a cross-sectional study in the province of Liege, Belgium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91(12):4769–4775

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ezzat S et al (2004) The prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a systematic review. Cancer 101(3):613–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gittleman H et al (2014) Descriptive epidemiology of pituitary tumors in the United States, 2004–2009. J Neurosurg 121(3):527–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McDowell BD et al (2011) Demographic differences in incidence for pituitary adenoma. Pituitary 14(1):23–30

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Gillam MP et al (2006) Advances in the treatment of prolactinomas. Endocr Rev 27(5):485–534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gruppetta M, Mercieca C, Vassallo J (2013) Prevalence and incidence of pituitary adenomas: a population based study in Malta. Pituitary 16(4):545–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ciccarelli A, Daly AF, Beckers A (2005) The epidemiology of prolactinomas. Pituitary 8(1):3–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Patil CG et al (2009) Non-surgical management of hormone-secreting pituitary tumors. J Clin Neurosci 16(8):985–993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fernandez A, Karavitaki N, Wass JA (2010) Prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a community-based, cross-sectional study in Banbury (Oxfordshire, UK). Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 72(3):377–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Colao A et al (2003) Gender differences in the prevalence, clinical features and response to cabergoline in hyperprolactinemia. Eur J Endocrinol 148(3):325–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Klibanski A (2010) Clinical practice. Prolactinomas. N Engl J Med 362(13):1219–1226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Delgrange E et al (2005) Clinical and histological correlations in prolactinomas, with special reference to bromocriptine resistance. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147(7):751–757; discussion 757–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Melmed S et al (2011) Diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96(2):273–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Casanueva FF et al (2006) Guidelines of the Pituitary Society for the diagnosis and management of prolactinomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 65(2):265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakhleh A et al (2018) Management of cystic prolactinomas: a review. Pituitary. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-018-0888-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nishioka H et al (2002) Gender-related differences in prolactin secretion in pituitary prolactinomas. Neuroradiology 44(5):407–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shimon I (2017) Giant prolactinomas: multi-modal approach to achieve tumor control. Endocrine 56(2):227–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lopes MBS (2017) The 2017 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the pituitary gland: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 134(4):521–535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Langlois F et al (2018) Predictors of silent corticotroph adenoma recurrence; a large retrospective single center study and systematic literature review. Pituitary 21(1):32–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ben-Shlomo A, Cooper O (2018) Silent corticotroph adenomas. Pituitary 21(2):183–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Molitch ME (2014) Management of medically refractory prolactinoma. J Neurooncol 117(3):421–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fleseriu M et al (2016) Hormonal replacement in hypopituitarism in adults: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101(11):3888–3921

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shimon I et al (2014) Women with prolactinomas presented at the postmenopausal period. Endocrine 47(3):889–894

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Berezin M, Shimon I, Hadani M (1995) Prolactinoma in 53 men: clinical characteristics and modes of treatment (male prolactinoma). J Endocrinol Invest 18(6):436–441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Iglesias P et al (2012) Prolactinomas in men: a multicentre and retrospective analysis of treatment outcome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 77(2):281–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shimon I, Benbassat C, Hadani M (2007) Effectiveness of long-term cabergoline treatment for giant prolactinoma: study of 12 men. Eur J Endocrinol 156(2):225–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Oh MC, Aghi MK (2011) Dopamine agonist-resistant prolactinomas. J Neurosurg 114(5):1369–1379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ono M et al (2008) Prospective study of high-dose cabergoline treatment of prolactinomas in 150 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93(12):4721–4727

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kars M et al (2009) Long-term outcome of patients with macroprolactinomas initially treated with dopamine agonists. Eur J Intern Med 20(4):387–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Shimon I et al (2016) Giant prolactinomas larger than 60 mm in size: a cohort of massive and aggressive prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas. Pituitary 19(4):429–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Olafsdottir A, Schlechte J (2006) Management of resistant prolactinomas. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 2(10):552–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Delgrange E et al (1997) Sex-related difference in the growth of prolactinomas: a clinical and proliferation marker study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82(7):2102–2107

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pinzone JJ et al (2000) Primary medical therapy of micro- and macroprolactinomas in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85(9):3053–3057

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kars M et al (2009) Estimated age- and sex-specific incidence and prevalence of dopamine agonist-treated hyperprolactinemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94(8):2729–2734

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Briet C et al (2015) Pituitary apoplexy. Endocr Rev 36(6):622–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Vaneckova M et al (2007) Macroprolactinomas: retrospective follow up study in the MR imaging and correlation with clinical symptomatology. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 28(6):841–845

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cristina C et al (2007) PTTG expression in different experimental and human prolactinomas in relation to dopaminergic control of lactotropes. Mol Cancer 6:4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Delgrange E et al (2015) Expression of estrogen receptor alpha is associated with prolactin pituitary tumor prognosis and supports the sex-related difference in tumor growth. Eur J Endocrinol 172(6):791–801

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Lv H et al (2012) Expression of estrogen receptor alpha and growth factors in human prolactinoma and its correlation with clinical features and gender. J Endocrinol Invest 35(2):174–180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Lv H et al (2011) Effects of estrogen receptor antagonist on biological behavior and expression of growth factors in the prolactinoma MMQ cell line. J Neurooncol 102(2):237–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Babey M et al (2011) Pituitary surgery for small prolactinomas as an alternative to treatment with dopamine agonists. Pituitary 14(3):222–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Smith TR et al (2015) Current indications for the surgical treatment of prolactinomas. J Clin Neurosci 22(11):1785–1791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tirosh A et al (2015) Hypopituitarism patterns and prevalence among men with macroprolactinomas. Pituitary 18(1):108–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Tirosh A, Benbassat C, Shimon I (2015) Short-term decline in prolactin concentrations can predict future prolactin normalization, tumor shrinkage, and time to remission in men with macroprolactinomas. Endocr Pract 21(11):1240–1247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tirosh A, Shimon I (2015) Management of macroprolactinomas. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol 1:5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Elshazly K et al (2018) Clinical outcomes after endoscopic endonasal resection of giant pituitary adenomas. World Neurosurg 114:e447–e456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kreutzer J et al (2008) Operative treatment of prolactinomas: indications and results in a current consecutive series of 212 patients. Eur J Endocrinol 158(1):11–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Qu X et al (2011) Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of transsphenoidal surgery for prolactinoma in men: a single-center experience with 87 consecutive cases. Eur J Endocrinol 164(4):499–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Faje A et al (2016) Dopamine agonists can reduce cystic prolactinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101(10):3709–3715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Dogansen SC et al (2018) Clinicopathological significance of baseline T2-weighted signal intensity in functional pituitary adenomas. Pituitary. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-018-0877-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kreutz J et al (2015) Intensity of prolactinoma on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: towards another gender difference. Neuroradiology 57(7):679–684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Paek KI et al (2005) Clinical significance of Ki-67 labeling index in pituitary macroadenoma. J Korean Med Sci 20(3):489–494

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Lv L et al (2018) Clinically aggressive phenotype: a clinicopathological case series of atypical pituitary adenomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 167:93–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Raverot G et al (2018) European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas. Eur J Endocrinol 178(1):G1–G24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Liu X et al (2018) Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9, pituitary tumor transforming gene, high mobility group A 2, and Ki-67 in adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting pituitary tumors and their association with tumor recurrence. World Neurosurg 113:e213–e221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Ozgen T et al (1999) Prolactin secreting pituitary adenomas: analysis of 429 surgically treated patients, effect of adjuvant treatment modalities and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 141(12):1287–1294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Losa M et al (2002) Surgical treatment of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: early results and long-term outcome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87(7):3180–3186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Liu JK, Couldwell WT (2004) Contemporary management of prolactinomas. Neurosurg Focus 16(4):E2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Fahlbusch R et al (1984) Influence of preoperative bromocriptine therapy on success of surgery for microprolactinoma. Lancet 2(8401):520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Sughrue ME et al (2009) Pre-operative dopamine agonist therapy improves post-operative tumor control following prolactinoma resection. Pituitary 12(3):158–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Thomson JA et al (1994) Ten year follow up of microprolactinoma treated by transsphenoidal surgery. BMJ 309(6966):1409–1410

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Joao Prola, OHSU neuroradiologist, for assistance in re-reading magnetic resonance images. Dr. Fabienne Langlois, endocrinologist, at OHSU and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Canada for assistance with manuscript review.

Funding

This study did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or non-for-profit sector.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Fleseriu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest that could prejudice the study reported.

Additional information

Winnie Liu and Roula Shraiky Zahr are first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, W., Zahr, R.S., McCartney, S. et al. Clinical outcomes in male patients with lactotroph adenomas who required pituitary surgery: a retrospective single center study. Pituitary 21, 454–462 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-018-0898-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-018-0898-y

Keywords

Navigation