Skip to main content
Log in

Reciprocity, Multiplexity, and Exchange: Measures

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We introduce measures and statistical tests for multiplexity and exchange that are modeled on similar ideas developed for reciprocity quite early in the history of social network research. As properties of a multi-relation network, multiplexity, and exchange have almost as ancient a history as reciprocity, but have not been as intensively investigated from a methodological perspective. Multiplexity refers to the extent to which two ties, for example, advice and friendship, coincide over population; that is, do respondents name the same people as friends as the persons they nominate as individuals from who they seek advice. Exchange refers to the extent to which a tie of one type directed from person i to person j is returned by a tie of another type from j to i. We conceive of the current paper as the first part of a two-part paper, wherein the second part explores specific theoretical models for multiplexity and exchange.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achuthan S.B., Rao S.B., Rao A.R. (1982). The number of symmetric edges in a digraph with prescribed out-degrees. In: Vijayan K.S., Singh N.M. (eds) Proceedings of the Seminar on Combinatorics and Applications in honour of Professor S.S. Shrikhande on his 65th Birthday. Indian Statistical Institute, Calcutta, pp. 8–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau P.M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boissevain J. (1973). Preface. In: Boissevain J., Mitchell J.C. (eds) Network Analysis: Studies in Human Interaction. Mouton, The Hague, pp. 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G., Freeman L.C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows. Analytic Technologies, Harvard

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook K.S., Emerson R.M. (1978). Power, equity, and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review 43: 721–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fararo T.J., Skvoretz J. (1989). The biased net theory of social structures and the problem of integration. In: Berger J., Zelditch M. Jr., Anderson B. (eds) Sociological Theories in Progress: New Formulations. Sage, Newbury Park CA, pp. 212–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluckman M. (1955). The Judical Process Among the Barotse if Nothern Rhodesia. Manchester University Press, Manchester UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer B. (1969). Norms and the manipulation of relationships in a work context. In: Mitchell J.C. (eds) Social Networks in Urban Situations: Analyses of Personal Relationships in Central African Towns. Manchester University Press, Manchester UK, pp. 181–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer B. (1972). Strategy and Transaction in an African Factory. Manchester University Press, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz L., Powell J.H. (1955). Measurement of the tendency toward reciprocation of choice. Sociometry 19: 403–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt D. (1987). Cognitive social structures. Social Networks 9: 104–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazega E. (2001). The Collegial Phenomenon: The Social Mechanisms of Cooperation among Peers in a Corporate Law Partnership. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazega E., Pattison P. (1999). Multiplexity, generalized exchange, and cooperation in organizations. Social Networks 21: 67–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandel M. (2000). Measuring tendency towards mutuality in a social network. Social Networks 22: 285–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minor M.J. (1983). New directions in multiplexity analysis. In: Burt R.S., Minor M.J. (eds) Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 223–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell J.C. (1969). The concept and use of social networks. In: Mitchell J.C. (eds) Social Networks in Urban Situations: Analyses of Personal Relationships in Central African Towns. Manchester University Press, Manchester UK, pp. 1–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Molm L.D. (1990). Dynamics of power in social exchange. American Sociological Review 55: 427–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattison P., Wasserman S. (1999). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: II. Multivariate relations. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 52:169–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skvoretz J., Fararo T.J., Agneessens F. (2004). Advances in biased net theory: definitions, derivations, and estimations. Social Networks 26: 113–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skvoretz J., Willer D. (1993). Exclusion and power: a test of four theories of power in exchange networks. American Sociological Review 58: 801–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeldon P.D. (1969). The operation of voluntary associations and personal networks in the political processes of an inter-ethnic community. In: Mitchell J.C. (eds) Social Networks in Urban Situations: Analyses of Personal Relationships in Central African Towns. Manchester University Press, Manchester UK, pp. 128–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Willer D. (eds) (1999). Network Exchange Theory. Praeger, Westport CT

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Skvoretz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skvoretz, J., Agneessens, F. Reciprocity, Multiplexity, and Exchange: Measures. Qual Quant 41, 341–357 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9005-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9005-y

Keywords

Navigation