Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The dialectical psychoeducational workshop (DPEW) for males at risk for intimate partner violence: a pilot randomized controlled trial

  • Published:
Journal of Experimental Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data are presented from a pilot study that tested the initial effectiveness of the Dialectical Psychoeducational Workshop (DPEW) in reducing the potential risk for intimate partner violence (IPV). A randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an experimental intervention (DPEW), and a control condition, the first session of an eight-week anger management program (AMW), was employed. Differences between experimental and control groups were analyzed by chi-square and t tests. Self-report questionnaires were administered pre- and post-test to 55 study participants. The questionnaire was comprised of standardized measures and highly-structured questions. Quantitative analyses provided strong preliminary support for the DPEW’s effectiveness in lowering a participant’s desire to express anger physically, while decreasing the potential risk for physical violence. This pilot study demonstrated promising initial support for the DPEW as an alternative, preventative intervention for males at risk for intimate partner violence. Its strong preliminary results provide evidence for a larger RCT. The study’s results are limited by a reliance on self-report measures, the brevity of the intervention, and a small sample size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Requests pertaining to the complete DPEW measures and full curriculum may be made to: Mary M. Cavanaugh, PhD, at mary.cavanaugh@hunter.cuny.edu

  2. Three respondents’ questionnaires ultimately could not be used as they were either missing a pre- or post-test questionnaire.

  3. If during the course of the study, the researchers were to become aware of a participant’s threat of or use of violence, he would have been given an immediate referral for appropriate services and, where necessary, the proper legal authorities would have been notified.

  4. For copies of the DPEW hand-outs and complete curriculum, please contact: Mary M. Cavanaugh, PhD, at mary.cavanaugh@hunter.cuny.edu

References

  • Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work?: a meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalano, S. Intimate Partner Violence in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, December 2007, available online at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/intimate/ipv.htm

  • Cavanaugh, M. M. (2007). An exploration of the feasibility and utility of the Dialectical Psychoeducational Workshop (DPEW) as a preventative intervention for males at potential risk of intimate partner violence. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 3260886)

  • Cavanaugh, M. M., & Gelles, R. J. (2005). The utility of male domestic violence offender typologies: new directions for research, policy, and practice. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(2), 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanaugh, M. M., Solomon, P., & Gelles, R. J. (2011). The Dialectical Psychoeducational Workshop (DPEW): The conceptual framework and curriculum for a preventative intervention for males at risk for IPV. Violence Against Women, 17(5)

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A Power Primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. CONSORT Statement. (2001). http://www.consort-statement.org/home/

  • Feder, L., & Wilson, D. B. (2005). A meta-analytic review of court-mandated batterer intervention programs: can courts affect abusers’ behaviors? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 239–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). Ways of Coping Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fruzzetti, A. E., & Levensky, E. R. (2000). Dialectical behavior therapy for domestic violence: rationale and procedures. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 7, 435–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavin, D. R., Ross, H. E., & Skinner, H. A. (1989). Diagnostic validity of the drug abuse screening test in the assessment of DSM-III drug disorders. British Journal of Addiction, 84(3), 301–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gondolf, E. W. (2002). Batterer intervention systems: Issues, outcomes, and recommendations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, L. K., & Hastings, J. E. (1991). Personality correlates of men who batter and nonviolent men: some continuities and discontinuities. Journal of Family Violence, 6, 131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2000). A typology of men who are violent toward their female partners: making sense of the heterogeneity in husband violence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 140–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Anglin, K. (1991). The competency of responses given by martially violent versus nonviolent men to problematic marital situations. Violence and Victims, 6, 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Smutzler, N. (1996). Comparing the emotional reactions and behavior intentions of violent and nonviolent husbands to aggressive, distressed, and other wife behaviors. Violence and Victims, 11, 319–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Stuart, G. L. (1994). Typologies of male batterers: three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 476–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, D., & Elliott, D. S. (1986). Reassessing the reliability and validity of self-report delinquency measures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2(4), 293–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A. R. (2009). Practical implications of current domestic violence research: For law enforcement, prosecutors, and judges. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koons, C. R., Robins, C. J., Tweed, J. L., et al. (2001). Efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy in women veterans with borderline personality disorder. Behavior Therapy, 32, 371–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M. (1993). Skills training manual for treating borderline disorder. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M. (1994). Acceptance and change: the central dialectic in psychotherapy. In S. C. Hayes, N. S. Jacobson, V. M. Follettee, & M. J. Doughen (Eds.), Acceptance and change: content and context in psychotherapy (pp. 73–86). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M., & Kehrer, C. A. (1993). Borderline personality disorder. In D. H. Barlow (Ed.), Clinical handbook of psychological disorders: A step by step treatment manual (2nd ed., pp. 396–441). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M., & Schmidt, H. (1995). The dialectics of effective treatment of borderline personality disorder. In W. O. O’Donohue & L. Krasner (Eds.), Theories in behavior therapy: Exploring behavior change. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M., Armstrong, H. E., Suarez, A., Allmon, D., & Heard, H. L. (1991). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of chronically parasuicidal borderline patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 48, 1060–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M., Heard, H. L., & Armstrong, H. E. (1993). Naturalistic follow-up of a behavioral treatment for chronically parasuicidal borderline patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 971–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, T. R., Chapman, A. L., Rosenthal, M. Z., Kuo, J. R., & Linehan, M. M. (2006). Mechanisms for change in dialectical behavior therapy: theoretical and empirical observations. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(4), 459–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1996). Manual for the Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES). Monterey, CA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1997). Relations among personality scales of aggression, violence, and empathy: validation evidence bearing on the risk of eruptive violence scale. Aggressive Behavior, 23, 433–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, C. J., & Chapman, A. L. (2004). Dialectical behavior therapy: current status, recent developments, and future directions. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. G., & Hamill, R. M. (2003). Violence against women: synthesis of research on offender interventions. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheel, K. R. (2000). The empirical basis of dialectical behavior therapy: Summary, critique, and implications. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7, 68–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selzer, M. L., Vinokur, A., & Van Rooijen, L. (1975). A self-administered Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST). Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 36(1), 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedslund, G., Dalsbo, T. K., Steiro, A., Winsvold, A., & Clench-Aas, J. (2009). Cognitive behavioral therapy for men who physically abuse their female partner (Review). The Cochrane Collaboration. New York: Wiley

  • Snow, G. (2006). The blockrand package: Randomization for block random clinical trials. 1.1 ed. Salt Lake City: Intermountain Healthcare

  • Spielberger, C. D., Jacobs, G., Russel, S., & Crane, R. S. (1983). Assessment of anger: The Stait-Trait Anger Scale. In J. N. Butcher & C. Speilberger (Eds.), Advances in Personality Assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 159–187). Hilkdale, N.J: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stith, S. M., Smith, D. B., Penn, C. E., Ward, D. B., & Tritt, D. (2004). Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: a meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 10, 65–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. (1972). Short, homogenous version of marlowe—crowne sociality desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang, H., Barnes, G. C., Braithwaite, J., & Sherman, L. W. (1999). Experiments in restorative policing: A progress report on the Canberra Reintegrative Shaming Experiments (RISE). Retrieved June 5, 2009, from http://www.aic.gov.au/rjustice/rise/progress/1999.html

  • Waltz, J. (2002). Dialectical behavior therapy in the treatment of abusive behavior. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma, 7, 75–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary M. Cavanaugh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cavanaugh, M.M., Solomon, P.L. & Gelles, R.J. The dialectical psychoeducational workshop (DPEW) for males at risk for intimate partner violence: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Exp Criminol 7, 275–291 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-011-9126-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-011-9126-8

Keywords

Navigation