Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography Study of the Effect of Chemotherapy and Hormonal Therapy on the Uptake of 2-Deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-d-glucose in Murine Models of Breast Cancer

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Molecular Imaging and Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We used small animal positron emission tomography (PET) imaging to monitor the time-course of tumor metabolic response to hormone and chemotherapy in a murine model of hormone-sensitive breast cancer.

Procedures

Estrogen receptor positive murine mammary carcinomas were inoculated in Balb/c mice. Small animal PET imaging using 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) was used to assess tumor metabolic activity. Imaging was done before and at days 1, 7, and 14 after the administration of doxorubicin, methotrexate, letrozole, or placebo. The tumor uptake of FDG was calculated from a region-of-interest drawn around the tumor.

Results

All treatments resulted in a decrease in tumor growth rate and end volume compared to untreated control. FDG uptake was also markedly decreased after treatment although a flare reaction was observed on PET at day 7, the intensity of which varied according to the treatment modality.

Conclusion

PET imaging is sensitive to detect early changes associated with therapy in murine breast cancer models. A flare reaction was observed 7 days after the initiation of therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Volk EL, Rohde K, Rhee M, et al. (2000) Methotrexate cross-resistance in a mitoxantrone-selected multidrug-resistant MCF7 breast cancer cell line is attributable to enhanced energy-dependent drug efflux. Cancer Res 60:3514–3521

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dowsett M (2001) Overexpression of HER-2 as a resistance mechanism to hormonal therapy for breast cancer. Endocr-Relat Cancer 8:191–519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Clarke R, Leonessa F, Welch JN, Skaar C (2001) Cellular and molecular pharmacology of antiestrogen action and resistance. Pharmacol Rev 53:25–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Benard F, Turcotte E (2005) Imaging in breast cancer: single-photon computed tomography and positron-emission tomography. Breast Cancer Res 7:153–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aliaga A, Rousseau JA, Ouellette R, et al. (2004) Breast cancer models to study the expression of estrogen receptors with small animal PET imaging. Nucl Med Biol 31:761–770

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamacher K, Coenen HH, Stocklin G (1986) Efficient stereospecific synthesis of no-carrier-added 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose using aminopolyether supported nucleophilic substitution. J Nucl Med 27:235–238

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lanari C, Luthy I., Lamb CA, et al. (2001) Five novel hormone-responsive cell lines derived from murine mammary ductal carcinomas: in vivo and in vitro effects of estrogens and progestins. Cancer Res 61:293–302

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tomayko MM, Reynolds CP (1989) Determination of subcutaneous tumor size in athymic (nude) mice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 24:148–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lecomte R, Cadorette J, Richard P, Rodrigue S, Rouleau D (1994) Design and engineering aspects of a high resolution positron tomograph for small animal imaging. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 41:1446–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lecomte R, Cadorette J, Rodrigue S, et al. (1996) Initial results from the Sherbrooke avalanche photodiode positron tomograph. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 43:1952–1957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Selivanov V, Picard Y, Cadorette J, Rodrigue S, Lecomte R (2000) Detector response models for statistical iterative image reconstruction in high resolution PET. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 47:1168–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Keyes JW Jr (1995) SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value? J Nucl Med 36:1836–1839

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, et al. (2003) [(18)F]FDG PET monitoring of tumour response to chemotherapy: does [(18)F]FDG uptake correlate with the viable tumour cell fraction? Eur J Nucl Med 30:682–688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshioka T, Takahashi H, Oikawa H, et al. (1997) Influence of chemotherapy on FDG uptake by human cancer xenografts in nude mice. J Nucl Med 38:714–717

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mortimer JE, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA, et al. (2001) Metabolic flare: indicator of hormone responsiveness in advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:2797–2803

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Plotkin D, Lechner JJ, Jung WE, Rosen PJ (1978) Tamoxifen flare in advanced breast cancer. JAMA 240:2644–2646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zigrossi P, Brustia M, Bobbio F, Campanini M (2001) Flare and tumor lysis syndrome with atypical features after letrozole therapy in advanced breast cancer. A case report. Ann Ital Med Int 16:112–117

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Greenwald ES (1983) Megestrol acetate flare. Cancer Treat Rep 67:405

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance (CBCRA) grant 015388, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) grant MT-15348 and a “Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec” salary award program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to François Bénard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aliaga, A., Rousseau, J.A., Cadorette, J. et al. A Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography Study of the Effect of Chemotherapy and Hormonal Therapy on the Uptake of 2-Deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-d-glucose in Murine Models of Breast Cancer. Mol Imaging Biol 9, 144–150 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-007-0091-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-007-0091-6

Key words

Navigation