Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Gemcitabine and the Gemcitabine Analog 1-(2′-deoxy-2′-fluoroarabinofuranosyl) Cytosine (FAC) in Human Orthotopic and Genetically Modified Mouse Pancreatic Cancer Models

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Molecular Imaging and Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Although gemcitabine is a mainstay of pancreatic cancer therapy, it is only moderately effective, and it would be desirable to measure drug uptake in patients. 1-(2′-deoxy-2′-fluoroarabinofuranosyl) cytosine (FAC), is an analog of gemcitabine, and when labeled with F-18, it may be a potential surrogate PET tracer for the drug.

Procedures

[18F]FAC was synthesized to a radiochemical purity of >96 %. The human tumor lines AsPC1, BxPC3, Capan-1, Panc1, and MiaPaca2 were grown orthotopically in nude mice. KPC mice that conditionally express oncogenic K-ras and p53 mutations in pancreatic tissue were also used. The intra-tumoral distributions of [14C]gemcitabine and [18F]FAC were mapped with autoradiography. The inter-tumor correlation between [14C]gemcitabine and [18F]FAC was established in the orthotopic tumors. Expression of the equilibrative and concentrative nucleoside transporters (ENT, CNT) in vitro was detected by western blotting. Drug uptake was characterized in vitro using [3H]gemcitabine and the effect of transporter inhibition on gemcitabine and FAC uptake was investigated. The relative affinity of cells for gemcitabine and FAC was tested in competition assays.

The cell lines differed in sensitivity to transport inhibitors and in competition studies. There was a good in vivo correlation between the total uptake of [18F]FAC and [14C]gemcitabine, measured across all orthotopic tumors. Using the KPC and BxPC3 models, we found that [14C]gemcitabine and [18F]FAC were largely co-localized.

Conclusions

In the lines examined here, [18F]FAC uptake correlates well with gemcitabine in vivo, supporting the notion that [18F]FAC can serve as a PET radiotracer surrogate to determine the uptake and distribution of gemcitabine within pancreatic tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang J, Visser F, King KM et al (2007) The role of nucleoside transporters in cancer chemotherapy with nucleoside drugs. Cancer Metastasis Rev 26:85–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Heinemann V, Hertel LW, Grindey GB, Plunkett W (1988) Comparison of the cellular pharmacokinetics and toxicity of 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine and 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine. Cancer Res 48:4024–4031

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Veltkamp SA, Pluim D, van Eijndhoven MA et al (2008) New insights into the pharmacology and cytotoxicity of gemcitabine and 2′,2′-difluorodeoxyuridine. Mol Cancer Ther 7:2415–2425

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rudin D, Li L, Niu N et al (2011) Gemcitabine cytotoxicity: interaction of efflux and deamination. J Drug Metab Toxicol 2:1–10

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Feig C, Gopinathan A, Neesse A et al (2012) The pancreas cancer microenvironment. Clin Cancer Res 18:4266–4276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Paproski RJ, Young JD, Cass CE (2010) Predicting gemcitabine transport and toxicity in human pancreatic cancer cell lines with the positron emission tomography tracer 3′-deoxy-3′-fluorothymidine. Biochem Pharmacol 79:587–595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wei CH, Gorgan TR, Elashoff DA et al (2013) A meta-analysis of gemcitabine biomarkers in patients with pancreaticobiliary cancers. Pancreas 42:1303–1310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Laing RE, Walter MA, Campbell DO et al (2009) Noninvasive prediction of tumor responses to gemcitabine using positron emission tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:2847–2852

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee JT, Campbell DO, Satyamurthy N, Czernin J, Radu CG (2012) Stratification of nucleoside analog chemotherapy using 1-(2′-deoxy-2′-18F-fluoro-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl)cytosine and 1-(2′-deoxy-2′-18F -fluoro-beta-L-arabinofuranosyl)-5-methylcytosine PET. J Nucl Med 53:275–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Schwarzenberg J, Radu CG, Benz M et al (2011) Human biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of novel PET probes targeting the deoxyribonucleoside salvage pathway. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38:711–721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shu CJ, Campbell DO, Lee JT et al (2010) Novel PET probes specific for deoxycytidine kinase. J Nucl Med 51:1092–1098

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Radu CG, Shu CJ, Nair-Gill E et al (2008) Molecular imaging of lymphoid organs and immune activation by positron emission tomography with a new [18F]-labeled 2′-deoxycytidine analog. Nat Med 14:783–788

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu CY, Chan PC, Chang WT et al (2009) Radiosynthesis of F-18 labeled cytidine analog 2′-fluoro-5-iodo-l-beta-d-arabinofuranosylcytosine ([(18)F]FIAC). Appl Radiat Isot 67:1362–1365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hingorani SR, Petricoin EF, Maitra A et al (2003) Preinvasive and invasive ductal pancreatic cancer and its early detection in the mouse. Cancer Cell 4:437–450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jackson EL, Willis N, Mercer K et al (2001) Analysis of lung tumor initiation and progression using conditional expression of oncogenic K-ras. Genes Dev 15:3243–3248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Olive KP, Tuveson DA, Ruhe ZC et al (2004) Mutant p53 gain of function in two mouse models of Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Cell 119:847–860

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hingorani SR, Wang L, Multani AS et al (2005) Trp53R172H and KrasG12D cooperate to promote chromosomal instability and widely metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in mice. Cancer Cell 7:469–483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Garcia-Manteiga J, Molina-Arcas M, Casado FJ, Mazo A, Pastor-Anglada M (2003) Nucleoside transporter profiles in human pancreatic cancer cells: role of hCNT1 in 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine- induced cytotoxicity. Clin Cancer Res 9:5000–5008

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cass CE, Gaudette LA, Paterson AR (1974) Mediated transport of nucleosides in human erythrocytes. Specific binding of the inhibitor nitrobenzylthioinosine to nucleoside transport sites in the erythrocyte membrane. Biochim Biophys Acta 345:1–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gupte A, Buolamwini JK (2009) Synthesis and biological evaluation of phloridzin analogs as human concentrative nucleoside transporter 3 (hCNT3) inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 19:917–921

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mackey JR, Yao SY, Smith KM et al (1999) Gemcitabine transport in xenopus oocytes expressing recombinant plasma membrane mammalian nucleoside transporters. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1876–1881

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reyes G, Nivillac NM, Karim MZ et al (2011) The Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter (ENT1) can be phosphorylated at multiple sites by PKC and PKA. Mol Membr Biol 28:412–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stolk M, Cooper E, Vilk G, Litchfield DW, Hammond JR (2005) Subtype-specific regulation of equilibrative nucleoside transporters by protein kinase CK2. Biochem J 386:281–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kramer RM, Russell J, Humm JL (2015) Distribution of gemcitabine is nearly homogenous in two orthotopic murine models of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 30:299–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Russell.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Support

This work was partially supported by an MSKCC Imaging and Radiation Sciences (IMRAS) seed grant. JR and JLH were supported by NIH grant 1 R01 CA194321-01A1; NP was supported by the Mr. William H. and Mrs. Alice Goodwin and the Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research and the Center for Experimental Therapeutics of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. RMK was supported by Tri-Institutional Training Grant R25-OD010447-02. We thank the members of the Small Animal Imaging Core for their assistance. The SAICF is supported in part by US National Institutes of Health (NIH) P30 CA008748-48, S10 RR020892-01, S10 RR028889-01 and the Geoffrey Beene Cancer Research Center. P.B.R was supported in part by a K12 Paul Calebresi Career Development Award for Clinical Oncology (K12 CA187069).

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 422 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Russell, J., Pillarsetty, N., Kramer, R.M. et al. In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Gemcitabine and the Gemcitabine Analog 1-(2′-deoxy-2′-fluoroarabinofuranosyl) Cytosine (FAC) in Human Orthotopic and Genetically Modified Mouse Pancreatic Cancer Models. Mol Imaging Biol 19, 885–892 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-017-1078-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-017-1078-6

Key words

Navigation