Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A prospective 10-year follow-up polygraphic study of patients treated with a mandibular protruding device

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sleep and Breathing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This 10-year follow-up prospective study aimed to evaluate the effects of treatment with a mandibular protruding device (MPD) on respiratory parameters and subjective symptoms in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or snoring.

Methods

Seventy-seven consecutive patients diagnosed with OSA or snoring were treated with an MPD. At baseline and the 10-year follow-up, a polygraphic examination and questionnaires on sleep quality were administrated and weight, and neck size was measured.

Results

At the 10-year follow-up, we examined 64 of the 77 patients and recorded their current treatment (45 MPD, 9 continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and 10 no treatment). For MPD patients, 89 % reported MPD use every night and 9 % several nights a week. Compared to baseline, MPD users with OSA had a significantly decreased oxygen desaturation index (ODI) (p = 0.006) and increased lowest arterial oxygen saturation, SaO2 nadir (p = 0.007) after 10 years. MPD treatment was successful for 70 % of OSA patients, yet 89 % subjectively considered themselves cured, indicating overestimation of the treatment effect. OSA patients who responded to treatment maintained baseline weight and neck size, while these increased for non-responders. Of the baseline snorers still using an MPD, 93 % maintained an ODI value of <5. All CPAP users had an ODI value of <5. Both OSA and snorers using an MPD had significantly fewer self- and relative reports of snoring, apnea, daytime tiredness, and poor night sleep quality (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

MPD treatment is well tolerated and effective in a long-term, 10-year perspective. Weight gain may jeopardize MPD effects. Both patients and relatives reported significantly less snoring and fewer periods of apnea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peker Y, Hedner J, Norum J, Kraiczi H, Carlson J (2002) Increased incidence of cardiovascular disease in middle-aged men with obstructive sleep apnea: a 7-year follow-up. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166:159–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yaggi HK, Concato J, Kernan WN, Lichtman JH, Brass LM, Mohsenin V (2005) Obstructive sleep apnea as a risk factor for stroke and death. N Engl J Med 353:2034–2041

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marin JM, Carrizo SJ, Vicente E, Agusti AG (2005) Long-term cardiovascular outcomes in men with obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea with or without treatment with continuous positive airway pressure: an observational study. Lancet 365:1046–1053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tregear S, Reston J, Schoelles K, Phillips B (2009) Obstructive sleep apnea and risk of motor vehicle crash: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Sleep Med 5:573–581

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lim J, Lasserson TJ, Fleetham J, Wright J (2006) Oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD004435

  6. Ferguson KA, Cartwright R, Rogers R, Schmidt-Nowara W (2006) Oral appliances for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea: a review. Sleep 29:244–262

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoffstein V (2007) Review of oral appliances for treatment of sleep-disordered breathing. Sleep Breath 11:1–22

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gagnadoux F, Fleury B, Vielle B, Petelle B, Meslier N, N'Guyen XL, Trzepizur W, Racineux JL (2009) Titrated mandibular advancement versus positive airway pressure for sleep apnoea. Eur Respir J 34:914–920

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Aarab G, Lobbezoo F, Hamburger HL, Naeije M (2011) Oral appliance therapy versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Respiration 81:411–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Phillips CL, Grunstein RR, Darendeliler MA, Mihailidou AS, Srinivasan VK, Yee BJ, Marks GB, Cistulli PA (2013) Health outcomes of continuous positive airway pressure versus oral appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 187:879–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fransson AM, Tegelberg A, Leissner L, Wenneberg B, Isacsson G (2003) Effects of a mandibular protruding device on the sleep of patients with obstructive sleep apnea and snoring problems: a 2-year follow-up. Sleep Breath 7:131–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marklund M, Franklin KA, Sahlin C, Lundgren R (1998) The effect of a mandibular advancement device on apneas and sleep in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 113:707–713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aarab G, Lobbezoo F, Heymans MW, Hamburger HL, Naeije M (2011) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea. Respiration 82:162–168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Walker-Engstrom ML, Tegelberg A, Wilhelmsson B, Ringqvist I (2002) 4-year follow-up of treatment with dental appliance or uvulopalatopharyngoplasty in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized study. Chest 121:739–746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghazal A, Sorichter S, Jonas I, Rose EC (2009) A randomized prospective long-term study of two oral appliances for sleep apnoea treatment. J Sleep Res 18:321–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mehta A, Qian J, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA, Cistulli PA (2001) A randomized, controlled study of a mandibular advancement splint for obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163:1457–1461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Randerath WJ, Heise M, Hinz R, Ruehle KH (2002) An individually adjustable oral appliance vs continuous positive airway pressure in mild-to-moderate obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Chest 122:569–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmidt-Nowara WW, Meade TE, Hays MB (1991) Treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea with a dental orthosis. Chest 99:1378–1385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Sullivan RA, Hillman DR, Mateljan R, Pantin C, Finucane KE (1995) Mandibular advancement splint: an appliance to treat snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 151:194–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lam B, Sam K, Lam JC, Lai AY, Lam CL, Ip MS (2011) The efficacy of oral appliances in the treatment of severe obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep and Breathing 15:195–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fransson AM, Isacsson G, Leissner LC, Nasman AB, Alton MK (2001) Treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea with a mandibular protruding device: an open-label study. Sleep Breath 5:23–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fransson AM, Tegelberg A, Johansson A, Wenneberg B (2004) Influence on the masticatory system in treatment of obstructive sleep apnea and snoring with a mandibular protruding device: a 2-year follow-up. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126:687–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marklund M, Stenlund H, Franklin KA (2004) Mandibular advancement devices in 630 men and women with obstructive sleep apnea and snoring: Tolerability and predictors of treatment success. Chest 125:1270–1278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kushida CA, Morgenthaler TI, Littner MR et al (2006) Practice parameters for the treatment of snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea with oral appliances: an update for 2005. Sleep 29:240–243

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Otsuka R, Almeida FR, Lowe AA, Ryan F (2006) A comparison of responders and nonresponders to oral appliance therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129:222–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Eggensperger N, Smolka W, Iizuka T (2005) Long-term changes of hyoid bone position and pharyngeal airway size following mandibular setback by sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 33:111–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu Y, Lowe AA, Fleetham JA, Park YC (2001) Cephalometric and physiologic predictors of the efficacy of an adjustable oral appliance for treating obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 120:639–647

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Walker-Engstrom ML, Ringqvist I, Vestling O, Wilhelmsson B, Tegelberg A (2003) A prospective randomized study comparing two different degrees of mandibular advancement with a dental appliance in treatment of severe obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep and Breathing 7:119–130

  29. Hoekema A, Doff MH, de Bont LG, van der Hoeven JH, Wijkstra PJ, Pasma HR, Stegenga B (2007) Predictors of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea treatment outcome. J Dent Res 86:1181–1186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anette Fransson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wiman Eriksson, E., Leissner, L., Isacsson, G. et al. A prospective 10-year follow-up polygraphic study of patients treated with a mandibular protruding device. Sleep Breath 19, 393–401 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-014-1034-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-014-1034-5

Keywords

Navigation