Abstract
The authors report results from four experiments that describe the influence of incidental affect on preference for the status quo. The first and second experiments, each using different affect induction methods, demonstrated that positive affect increased and negative affect reduced the choice of the status quo alternative. The third experiment replicated the effect of incidental affect on a separate dimension of status quo bias, the preference of omission. The last experiment investigated whether preference for the status quo was affected by four specific emotions that differed along valence and certainty appraisal dimensions. Compared with affective states associated with uncertainty, affective states associated with certainty led to a greater magnitude of status quo bias. The certainty appraisals mediated the effect of specific emotions on preference for the status quo, regardless of the emotion valence. The findings extend our knowledge by showing that incidental affect can influence consumer choice through emotion-related appraisals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adaval, R. (2003). How good gets better and bad gets worse: understanding the impact of affect on evaluations of known brands. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 352–367.
Anderson, C. J. (2003). The psychology of doing nothing: forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychology Bulletin, 129(1), 139–167.
Aspinwall, L. G., & Brunhart, S. M. (1996). Distinguishing optimism from denial: optimistic beliefs predict attention to health threats. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 993–1002.
Averill, J. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression: implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38, 1145–1160.
Bagozzi, R. P., Gopinath, M., & Nyer, P. U. (1999). The role of emotions in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 184–206.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
Baron, J., & Ritov, I. (1994). Reference points and omission bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59, 475–498.
Bless, H. (2001). The relation between mood and the use of general knowledge structures. In L. L. Martin, & G. L. Clore (Eds.) Mood and social cognition: Contrasting theories (pp. 9–29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
Bless, H., Bohner, G., Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1990). Mood and persuasion: a cognitive response analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16(2), 331–345.
Bless, H., Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., Golisano, V., Rabe, C., & Wölk, M. (1996a). Mood and the use of scripts: does happy mood make people really mindless? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 665–679.
Bless, H., Schwarz, N., & Wieland, R. (1996b). Mood and the impact of category membership and individuating information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 935–959.
Bodenhausen, G. V. (1993). Emotions, arousal, and stereotypic judgment: a heuristic model of affect and stereotyping. In D. K. Mackie, & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.) Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 13–38). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Bodenhausen, G. V., Kramer, G. P., & Susser, K. (1994a). Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 621–623.
Bodenhausen, G. V., Sheppard, L. A., & Kramer, G. P. (1994b). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 45–62.
Chernev, A. (2004). Goal orientation and consumer preference for the status quo. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 557–565.
Clore, G. L., Wyer, R. S., Dienes, B., Gasper, K., Gohm, C., & Isbell, L. (2001). Affective feelings as feedback: some cognitive consequences. In L. L. Martin, & G. L. Clore (Eds.) Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 27–62). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
Cohen, J. B., Pham, M. T., & Andrade, E. B. (2007). The nature and role of affect in consumer behavior. Florida, USA: University of Florida.
Côté, S. (2005). Reconciling the feelings-as-information and hedonic contingency models of how mood influences systematic information processing. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(8), 1656–1679.
DeSteno, D., Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Rucker, D. D. (2000). Beyond valence in the perception of likelihood: the role of emotion specificity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 397–416.
Ekman, P. (1993). Facial expression of emotion. American Psychologist, 48, 384–392.
Ellsworth, P. C., & Smith, C. A. (1988). From appraisal to emotion: differences among unpleasant feelings. Motivation and Emotion, 12(3), 271–302.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
Fiedler, K. (1990). Mood-dependent selectivity in social cognition. In W. Stroebe, & M. Hewstone (Eds.) European review of social psychology (vol. 1 (pp. 1–32). NewYork: John Wiley.
Forgas, J. P. (1994). Sad and guilty?: affective influences on the explanation of conflict in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 56–68.
Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: the Affect Infusion Model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 39–66.
Forgas, J. P., & Ciarrochi, J. (2001). On being happy and possessive: the interactive effects of mood and personality on consumer judgments. Psychology and Marketing, 18, 239–260.
Fredrickson, B. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300–319.
Fredrickson, B. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.
Garg, N., Inman, J. J., & Mittal, V. (2005). Incidental and task-related affect: a re-inquiry and extension of the influence of affect on choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 154–159 (June).
Inman, J. J., & Zeelenberg, M. (2002). Regret in repeat purchase versus switching decisions: the attenuating role of decision justifiability. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 116–128.
Isbell, L. M. (2004). Not all happy people are lazy or stupid: evidence of systematic processing in happy mood. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 341–349.
Isen, A. M. (1987). Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 203–253.
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122–1131.
Isen, A. M., & Geva, N. (1987). The influence of positive affect on acceptable level of risk: the person with a large canoe has a large worry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 145–154.
Isen, A. M., & Means, B. (1983). The influence of positive affect on decision-making strategy. Social Cognition, 2(1), 18–31.
Isen, A. M., Niedenthal, P. M., & Cantor, N. (1992). An influence of positive affect on social categorization. Motivation and Emotion, 6, 65–78.
Isen, A. M., Nygren, T. E., & Ashby, F. G. (1988). The influence of positive affect on the subjective utility of gains and losses: it's not worth the risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 710–717.
Isen, A. M., & Simmonds, S. (1978). The effect of feeling good on a helping task that is incompatible with good mood. Social Psychology Quarterly, 41, 345–349.
Kahn, B. E., & Isen, A. M. (1993). The influence of positive-affect on variety seeking among safe, enjoyable products. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 257–270.
Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 267–323.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
Kahnenman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preference. Scientific American, 246, 160–173.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350.
Keltner, D., Ellsworth, P. C., & Edwards, K. (1993). Beyond simple pessimism: effect of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 740–752.
Kuvaas, B., & Kaufmann, G. (2004). Impact of mood, framing, and need for cognition and decision makers’ recall and confidence. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 59–74.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lee, A. Y., & Sternthal, B. (1999). The effects of positive mood on memory. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(2), 115–127.
Lerner, J. S., Goldberg, J. H., & Tetlock, P. E. (1998). Sober second thought: the effects of accountability on attributions of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 563–574.
Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgment and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 473–493.
Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 81(1), 146–159.
Levenson, R. W. (1992). Autonomic nervous-system differences among emotions. Psychological Science, 3, 23–27.
Lin, C.-H., Chuang, S.-C., Kao, D. T., & Kung, C.-Y. (2006). The role of emotions in the endowment effect. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 589–597.
Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. New York: Wiley.
Luce, M. F., Payne, J. W., & Bettman, J. R. (1999). Emotional trade-off difficulty and choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 143–155 (May).
Mackie, D. M., & Worth, L. T. (1989). Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 27–40 (July).
Mackie, D. M., Asuncion, A. G., & Rosselli, F. (1992). The impact of positive affect on persuasive processes. In D. M. Clark (Ed.) Emotion and social behavior (pp. 247–270). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Martin, L. L., Ward, D. W., Achee, J. W., & Wyer, R. S. (1993). Mood as input: people have to interpret the motivational implications of their moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 317–326 (March).
Nowlis, S. M., Kahn, B. E., & Dhar, R. (2002). Coping with ambivalence: the effect of removing a neutral option on consumer attitude and preference judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 319–334 (December).
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). Cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pelham, B. W., & Wachsmuth, J. O. (1995). The waxing and waning of the social self: Assimilation and contrast in social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 825–838.
Raghunathan, R., & Pham, M. T. (1999). All negative moods are not equal: motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 56–77.
Reed, M. B., & Aspinwall, L. G. (1998). Self-affirmation reduces biased processing of healthy behavior: the role of message framing. Motivation and Emotion, 22(2), 99–132.
Riis, J., & Schwarz, N. (2000). Approaching and avoiding Linda: motor signals influence the conjunction fallacy. Social Cognition, 21, 247–262.
Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1990). Reluctance to vaccinate: omission bias and ambiguity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 263–277.
Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1992). Status-quo and omission bias. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 49–61.
Rucker, D. D., & Petty, R. E. (2004). Emotion specificity and consumer behavior: anger, sadness, and preference for activity. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 3–21.
Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7–59.
Schimmack, U., & Diener, E. (1997). Affect intensity: separating intensity and frequency in repeatedly measured affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1313–1329.
Schwarz, N. (1990). What respondents learn from scales: the informative functions of response alternatives. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2, 274–285.
Schwarz, N., Bless, H., & Bohner, G. (1991). Mood and persuasion: affective states influence the processing of persuasive communications. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 24, (pp. 161–201)). San Diego: Academic.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 512–523.
Schweitzer, M. (1994). Disentangling status quo an omission effects: an experimental analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 457–476 (June).
Sedikides, C. (1995). Central and peripheral self-conceptions are differentially influenced by mood: tests of differential sensitivity hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 759–777.
Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813–838.
Spranca, M., Minsk, E., & Baron, J. (1991). Omission and commission in judgment and choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 76–105.
Tansey, R., White, M., Long, R. G., & Smith, M. (1996). A comparison of loglinear modeling and logistic regression in management research. Journal of Management, 22(2), 339–358.
Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39–60 (March).
Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: the effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 973–988.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039–1061.
Weary, G., & Jacobson, J. A. (1997). Causal uncertainty beliefs and diagnostic information seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 839–848.
Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Mood management across affective states: the hedonic contingency hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1034–1048.
Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Positive mood can increase or decrease message scrutiny: the hedonic contingency view of mood and message processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 5–15.
Weiner, B. (1980). A cognitive (attribution)–emotion–action model of motivated behavior: an analysis of judgments of help-giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(2), 186–200.
Weiner, B., Graham, S., & Chandler, C. (1982). Pity, anger, and guilt: an attributional analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8(2), 226–232.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Product category scenarios
Apartment
“Imagine that you have been renting a one-bedroom apartment (Current Apartment). Your current lease is up and you have the chance to stay in your current apartment or move to a different apartment (New Apartment). What will you do?”
Health club
“Imagine that you have been attending a health club (Current Club). Your membership will expire in one week and you have the chance to stay at your current club or go to a different club (New Club). What will you do?”
Vacation hotel
“You are planning a weekend break in the country with some old friends. You have spent many happy, relaxing weekends in a favorite hotel, the Manor, which has always provided you with excellent hospitality and the personal touch. You hear of another hotel in the same area (the Grange) which appears to offer a slightly higher standard of accommodation, meals, and so forth. You wonder which hotel you should book. What will you do?”
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yen, H.R., Chuang, SC. The effect of incidental affect on preference for the status quo. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 36, 522–537 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-008-0084-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-008-0084-2