Skip to main content
Log in

Évolution du concept de qualité de vie en oncologie et de sa mesure à travers le temps

Evolution of the concept of quality of life in oncology and its measurement through time

  • Article Original / Original Article
  • Published:
Psycho-Oncologie

Résumé

Cet article décrit l’évolution historique du concept de la qualité de vie (QV) et de sa mesure en oncologie. Ainsi, il présente les définitions associées au concept de QV suivi d’une section sur l’émergence et l’évolution de ce concept en oncologie et d’une autre qui expose les facteurs qui ont favorisé l’émergence du concept de QV. La dernière section porte sur la mesure de la QVet son évolution. L’article conclut que le concept QV se définit aujourd’hui comme Patients Reported Outcomes (PROs) et que les notions QV, QV liée à la santé et état de santé possèdent une connotation différente. De plus, il fait état que les dimensions retenues pour décrire et évaluer la QV des patients atteints de cancer ne font pas encore l’unanimité auprès des chercheurs. Enfin, l’article identifie trois méthodes d’évaluation de la QV, chacune comportant des avantages et des inconvénients.

Abstract

This article describes the historical development of the concept of quality of life and its measurement in oncology. Thus, it presents the definitions associated with the concept of quality of life, followed by a section on the emergence and evolution of this concept in oncology and another one which outlines the factors that contributed to the emergence of the concept of quality of life. The last section focuses on the measurement of quality of life and its evolution. The article concludes that the concept of quality of life today is defined as Patient-Reported Outcomes and that the notions of quality of life, health-related quality of life and health status have different connotations. In addition, it reports that the dimensions selected to describe and evaluate the quality of life of cancer patients are still not yet approved unanimously among researchers. Finally, the article identifies three methods for assessing quality of life, each with advantages and disadvantages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Références

  1. Aaronson NK (1990) Quality of life assessment in cancer clinical trials. In: Holland JC, Zittoun R (eds) Psychosocial Aspects of Oncology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 97–113

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQC30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(5):365–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson KL, Burckhardt CS (1999) Conceptualization and measurement of quality of life as a outcome variable for health care intervention and research. J Adv Nurs 29(2):298–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bacqué MF (1995) L’évolution du concept de subjectivité: aspects psychologiques. Pratiques Psychologiques 1:5–13

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balducci L (1994) Perspectives on quality of life of older patients with cancer. Drugs Aging 4(4):313–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brady MJ, Peterman AH, Fitchett G, et al (1999) A case for including spirituality in quality of life measurement in oncology. Psychooncology 8:417–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brédart A, Dolbeault S (2005) Évaluation de la qualité de vie en oncologie: I - définitions et objectifs. Rev Francoph Psycho-Oncol 1:7–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brédart A, Dolbeault S (2005) Évaluation de la qualité de vie en oncologie: II - méthodes. Rev Francoph Psycho-Oncol 1:13–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brook RH, Ware JE, Davies-Avery A, et al (1979) Overview of adult health measures fielded in Rand’s health insurance study. Med Care 17(Suppl 7):iii–x:1–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brousse C, Boisaubert B (2007) La qualité de vie et ses mesures. Rev Med Interne 28:458–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Calman KC (1984) Quality of life in cancer patients: An hypothesis. J Med Ethics 10:124–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cantini F, Ells C, Hirtle M, et al (2004) Formation en éthique de la recherche: niveau 1 - module 1. Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux, Québec

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cella D (2001) Quality-of-life measurement in oncology. In: Baum A, Andersen BL (eds) Psychosocial interventions for cancer. American Psychological Association, Washington, pp 57–76

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Cella DF, Cherin EA (1988) Quality of life during and after cancer treatment. Compr Ther 14(5):69–75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen SR (2006) Quality of life assessment in palliative care. In: Bruera E, Higginson IJ, Ripamonti C (eds) Textbook in Palliative Medicine. Hodder Arnold Limited, London, pp 349–355

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dazord A, Gerin P, Brochier C, et al (1993) Un modèle de qualité de vie subjective adapté aux essais thérapeutiques: intérêt chez les patients dépressifs. Sante Ment Que XVIII(2):49–74

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dijkers M (1999) Measuring quality of life: Methodological issues. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 78(3):286–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Estwing-Ferrans C (2005) Quality of life as a outcome of cancer care. In: Yarbro CH, Frogge MH, Goodman M (eds) Cancer Nursing: Principles and practice (6th edition). Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, pp 183–200

    Google Scholar 

  19. Euro QoL Group (1990) EuroQoL: A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16:199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Evans RG, Stoddart GL (1996) Produire de la santé, consommer des soins. In: Evans RG, Barer ML, Marmor TR (eds) Être ou ne pas être en bonne santé: biologie et déterminants sociaux de la maladie (traduit en français par Michèle Giresse). Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, pp 37–73

    Google Scholar 

  21. Feeny D, Furlong W, Boyle M, et al (1995) Multi-attribute health status classification systems: Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoeconomics 7(6):490–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferrell BR, Grant M, Funk R, et al (1998) Quality of life in breast cancer, Part II. Psychological and spiritual well-being. Cancer Nurs 21(1):1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fries JF, Spitz PW (1990) The hierarchy of patient outcomes. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of Life Assessments in Clinical Trials. Raven Press, New York, pp 25–35

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gerin P, Dazord A, Cialdella P, et al (1991) Le questionnaire « Profil de la qualité de vie subjective » (PQVS). Therapie 46(2):131–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gilson BS, Gilson JS, Bergner M, et al (1975) The Sickness Impact Profile. Development of an outcome measure of health care. Am J Public Health 65:1304–1310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Holland JC (2002) History of psycho-oncology: Overcoming attitudinal and conceptual barriers. Psychosom Med 64:206–221

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Holland JC, Sacks A (2006) Principles of psycho-oncology. In: Kufe DW, Bast RC, Hait WN, et al (eds) Cancer medicine (7th edition). BC Decker Inc, Hamilton, pp 901–914

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jambon B, Johnson KI (1997) Individual quality of life and clinical trials. Quality of Life Newsletter 7(March–August), pp 1–2, pp 16–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jenney MEM, Kane RL, Lurie N (1995) Developing a measure of health outcomes in survivors of childhood cancer: A review of the issues. Med Pediatr Oncol 24:145–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CC (1976) Health status: Types of validity and the index of well-being. Health Serv Res 11:478–507

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH (1949) Clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: MacLeod CM (ed) Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 191–205

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kazis LE (1991) Health outcome assessments in medicine: History, applications, and new directions. Adv Intern Med 36:109–130

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lipscomb J, Gotay CC, Snyder C (2005) Introduction to outcomes assessment in cancer. In: Lipscomb J, Gotay CC, Snyder C (eds) Outcomes Assessment in cancer: Measures, methods, and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  34. Marie D, Dany L, Cannone P, et al (2010) Représentations sociales du cancer et de la chimiothérapie: enjeux pour la définition de la situation thérapeutique. Bull Cancer 97(5):577–587

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mytko JJ, Knight SJ (1999) Body, mind and spirit: Towards the integration of religiosity and spirituality in cancer quality of life research. Psychooncology 8:439–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. O’Connor R (2004) Measuring quality of life in health. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  37. Organisation mondiale de la santé (1986) Charte d’Ottawa pour la promotion de la santé. Association canadienne de la santé publique, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  38. Raeburn JM, Rootman I (1996) Quality of life and health promotion. In: Renwick R, Brown I, Nagler M (eds), Quality of life in health promotion and rehabilitation: Conceptual approaches, issues, and applications. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, pp 14–25

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schünemann H, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R (2005) Using quality of life measurements in pharmacoepidemiologic research. In: Strom BL (ed) Pharmacoepidemiology (4th edition). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., West Sussex, pp 653–663

    Google Scholar 

  40. Spitzer WO (1987) State of science 1986: Quality of life and functional status as target variables for research. J Chronic Dis 40(6):465–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Spitzer WO, Dobson AJ, Hall J, et al (1981) Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: A concise QL-index for use by physicians. J Chronic Dis 34(12):585–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sprangers MAG, Schwartz CE (1999) Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Soc Sci Med 48(11):1507–1515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Torrance GW (1987) Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life. J Chronic Dis 40(6):593–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Van der Steeg AFW, De Vries J, Roukema JA (2004) Quality of life and health status in breast carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 30:1051–1057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, et al (2004) Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 22(4):714–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Velikova G, Stark D, Selby P (1999) Quality of life instruments in oncology. Eur J Cancer 15(11):1571–1580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wagner LI, Cella D (2006) Quality of life and psychosocial issues. In: Bonadonna G, Hortobagyi GN, Valagussa P (eds) Texbook of Breast Cancer: A clinical guide to therapy (3rd edition). Taylor & Francis, London, pp 345–362

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wood-Dauphinee S (1999) Assessing quality of life in clinical research: From where have we come and where are we going? J Clin Epidemiol 52(4):355–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. World Health Organization (1947) The constitution of the World Health Organization. WHO Chron 1:29

    Google Scholar 

  51. World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) Group (1994) The development of the World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment instrument (the WHOQOL). In: Orley J, Kuyken W (eds) Quality of Life Assessment: International perspectives. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 41–57

    Google Scholar 

  52. World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) Group (1995) The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment: Position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med 41(10):1403–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. G. Trudel.

About this article

Cite this article

Trudel, J.G., Leduc, N. & Dumont, S. Évolution du concept de qualité de vie en oncologie et de sa mesure à travers le temps. Psycho Oncologie 6, 201–208 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11839-012-0392-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11839-012-0392-4

Mots clés

Keywords

Navigation