Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Information on Wild Berry and Mushroom Markets in European Countries

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The income-generating dimension of berry and mushroom picking is important in many European countries or regions of countries, predominantly for rural livelihoods. Due to the role and economic potential in the utilization of non-wood forest products (NWFPs), there is a need, and also an increasing interest in, monitoring their market volume and values both at national and international levels. There is a wealth of information from different sources at the national level, but at the international level there is a need to harmonize the information. It is a major challenge for international data collection efforts to balance the need for harmonization of statistics without losing interesting information. This paper presents and analyses statistics on the quantity and value of two groups of marketed NWFPs: (1) mushrooms and truffles, and (2) fruits, berries and edible nuts. The statistics came from the State of Europe’s Forests 2007 report and its country reports. Our paper describes the shortcomings of the statistics and identifies potential explanations for the limitations. The results from this study reveal that the usability of data on marketed mushrooms and berries varies a lot between countries. In general, the data are incomplete and not comparable among countries. Another challenge is the consistency of information on production, trade and consumption flows. Based on a Finnish example, balance sheets can be used to control the consistency and derive missing sub-components of trade flows. A regional case study of Nordic and Baltic countries and the Russian Federation illustrates potential from national household and operator surveys for complementary information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For the definition of forest and other wooded land, see MCPFE/UNECE/FAO (2007).

  2. National reports for SoEF2007 were reviewed mostly by experts from UNECE and FAO and, in addition, two experts designated by MCPFE member countries contributed to the process (Michalak, R., personal communication).

  3. Data from countries were collected during spring 2010.

References

  • Bauer J, Kniivilä M, Schmithüsen F (2004) Forest legislation in Europe: how 23 countries approach the obligation to reforest, public access and use of non-wood forest products. Geneva timber and forest discussion paper 37, UNECE/FAO

  • EEA (2006) European forest types. Categories and types for sustainable forest management reporting and policy. EEA Technical report, no 9/2006

  • FAO (2010) Global forest resources assessment 2010. Main report. FAO forestry paper 163. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FFRI (2006) Finnish statistical yearbook of forestry. Finnish Forest Research Institute (FFRI), Vammalan Kirjapaino Oy, Vammala

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatto P, Pettenella D, Secco L (2009) Payments for forest environmental services: organisational models and related experiences in Italy. iForest 2:133–139. doi:10.3832/ifor0504-002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson L, Uddstål R (2002) En beskrivning av den svenska skogsbärbranschen. Department report, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Vindeln Experimental Forests, Vindeln

  • Kangas K (2001) Commercial wild berry picking as a source of income in northern and eastern Finland. J Forest Econ 7(1):53–68. ISSN 1104-6899

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukuev Y (1999) Non-wood forest products in Northwest Russia. In: Niskanen A, Demidova N (eds) Research approaches to support non-wood forest products sector development: Case of Arkhangelsk region, Russia. EFI proceedings no. 29, pp 53–61

  • Lukin I, Gushchin V (1999) Non-wood forest products, their harvested volumes and household consumption in Arkhangelsk region, Russia. In: Niskanen A, Demidova N (eds) Research approaches to support non-wood forest products sector development: Case of Arkhangelsk region, Russia. EFI proceedings no. 29, pp 81–90

  • Maa-ja metsätalousministeriö (2007) Marjojen ja sienten kauppaantulomäärät vuonna 2006. MARSI 2006. Helsinki. http://www.mmm.fi/attachments/mmm/julkaisut/muutjulkaisut/5nIQT3MPv/MARSI_2006_MMM_raportti.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2011

  • Maa-ja metsätalousministeriö (2010) Luonnonmarjojen ja -sienten kauppaantulomäärät vuonna 2009. MARSI 2009. Suomen Gallup Elintarviketieto Oy, Food and Farm Facts Ltd. http://www.mmm.fi/attachments/mmm/julkaisut/muutjulkaisut/5odRpG9tA/MARSI_2009_MMM_raportti_Final.pdf. Accessed 17 November 2010

  • Malin A (1992) Marjojen ja sienten kauppaantulomäärät vuosina 1977–1991. MARSI 91. Pellervoseuran markkinatutkimuslaitos, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Malin A (1999) Marjojen ja sienten kauppaantulomäärät vuonna 1998. MARSI 98. Food and Farm Facts Ltd., Elintarviketieto Oy

    Google Scholar 

  • MCPFE (1998) Follow-up reports on the ministerial conferences on the protection of forests in Europe, Volume II. Liaison Unit in Lisbon (Ed)

  • MCPFE (2003) State of Europe’s forests 2003. The MCPFE report on sustainable forest management in Europe. Jointly prepared by the MCPFE Liaison Unit Vienna and UNECE/FAO

  • MCPFE/UNECE/FAO (2007) State of Europe’s Forests 2007. The MCPFE report on sustainable forest management in Europe. Jointly prepared by the MCPFE Liaison Unit Warsaw, UNECE and FAO. http://www.foresteurope.org/filestore/foresteurope/Publications/pdf/state_of_europes_forests_2007.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2011

  • Paal T (1998) Utilisation and research of non-wood products in the former Soviet Union. In: Lund G, Pajari B, Korhonen M (eds) Sustainable development of non-wood goods and benefits from boreal and cold temperate forests. EFI Proceedings No. 23, pp 119–124

  • Paal T, Saastamoinen O (1998) Non-wood plant products in Estonian forests. In: Lund G, Pajari B, Korhonen M (eds) Sustainable development of non-wood goods and benefits from boreal and cold temperate forests. EFI Proceedings No. 23, pp 109–117

  • Paassilta M, Moisio S, Jaakola L, Häggman H (2009) Voice of the Nordic wild berry industry: a survey among the companies. Oulu University Press, Oulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Plum P (1998) Denmark: non-wood forestry in a densely populated temperate country. In: Lund G, Pajari B, Korhonen M (eds) Sustainable development of non-wood goods and benefits from boreal and cold temperate forests. EFI proceedings no. 23, pp 125–130

  • Polevshchikova N (2005) An overview of the poverty and NWFP situation in the Republic of Karelia, Russia. In: Lacuna-Richman C, Turtiainen M, Barszcz A (eds) Non-wood forest products and poverty mitigation: concepts, overviews and cases. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry, Research notes 166, pp 37–46

  • Pouta E, Sievänen T, Neuvonen M (2006) Recreational wild berry picking in Finland—reflection of a rural life style. Soc Natur Resour 19:285–304. doi:10.1080/08941920500519156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards RT, Saastamoinen O (2010) NTFP policy, access to markets and labour issues in Finland: impacts of regionalization and globalization on the wild berry industry. In: Laird S, McLain R, Wynberg R (eds) Wild product governance—finding policies that work for non-timber forest products. Earthscan, People and Plants International Conservation Series, pp 287–307

  • Saastamoinen O, Kangas K, Aho H (2000) The picking of wild berries in Finland in 1997 and 1998. Scand J For Res 15: 645–650. ISSN 0282-7581

    Google Scholar 

  • Salo K (1995) Non-timber forest products and their utilization. In: Hytönen M (ed) Multiple-use forestry in the Nordic countries. The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki, pp 117–155

  • Seeland K, Staniszewski P (2006) Indicators for an European cross-country assessment of non-timber forest products and services. In: Niskanen A (ed) Issues affecting enterprise development in the forest sector in Europe. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry. Research notes 169, pp 299–320

  • Seeland K, Staniszewski P (2007) Indicators for a European cross-country state-of-the-art assessment of non-timber forest products and services. Small-scale Forestry 6:411–422. doi:10.1007/s11842-007-9029-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SFSS (2003) Lithuanian Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. State Forest Survey Service (SFSS), Kaunas. http://www.lvmi.lt/vmt/leidiniai.php?form_currentid=63. Accessed 3 Nov 2010

  • SFSS (2008) Lithuanian Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. State Forest Survey Service (SFSS), Kaunas. http://www.lvmi.lt/vmt/leidiniai.php?form_currentid=399. Accessed 3 Nov 2010

  • Vantomme P (2003) Compiling statistics on non-wood forest products as policy and decision-making tools at the national level. Int For Rev 5(2):156–160. doi:10.1505/IFOR.5.2.156.17412

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilkriste L (1998) NWFP resources and their future utilization in Latvia. In: Lund G, Pajari B, Korhonen M (eds) Sustainable development of non-wood goods and benefits from boreal and cold temperate forests. EFI proceedings no. 23, pp 103–108

  • Wichmann LG, Grönlund Ö (2007) Bär och svamp—nyttjandets utveckling. Student training paper, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of forest ecology and management, Umeå

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. Roman Michalak (UNECE/FAO Timber Section) who provided valuable information on various issues related to international reporting of NWFPs, especially on issues related to SoEF2007. We also wish to thank the following national correspondents who were officially nominated to supply data for SoEF2007 and who were kind enough to give additional information for this study: Thomas Nord-Larsen (Denmark), Kari T. Korhonen (Finland), Thröstur Eysteinsson (Iceland) and Stein M. Tomter (Norway). Further, we are grateful to a number of other professionals who contributed to the contents of this study: Taimi Paal (Estonia), Ilze Silamikele and Lelda Pamovska (Latvia), Anna Barszcz (Poland) and Eddie Karlsson and Karl Duvemo (Sweden). Finally, we like to thank our colleagues Mr. Sergey Zudin and Mrs. Elena Zudina (EFI) for their support and help in different phases of the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marjut Turtiainen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turtiainen, M., Nuutinen, T. Evaluation of Information on Wild Berry and Mushroom Markets in European Countries. Small-scale Forestry 11, 131–145 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-011-9173-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-011-9173-z

Keywords

Navigation