Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Treatment of varicose veins

  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Varicose veins (VVs) are the most common manifestation of chronic venous insufficiency, affecting 25% of women and 15% of men. Reticular veins and telangiectasias (spider veins) are found in more than 80% of the general population. VVs produce symptoms of pain, swelling, heaviness, fatigue, and pruritus and predispose patients to complications including bleeding, superficial thrombophlebitis, and ulcerations that interfere with activities of daily living and result in lost time from work. Current treatments for VVs include conservative measures, and when these are unsuccessful, more invasive surgical and endovenous interventions primarily aimed at reducing venous hypertension and preventing progression to chronic inflammation and ulcerations. Surgical procedures including saphenous vein stripping, ligation of the saphenofemoral junction, and ambulatory phlebectomy are effective in the treatment of VVs but are associated with a high complication rate and recovery time. Emerging endovenous therapies, including endovenous laser therapy, radiofrequency ablation, and endovenous foam sclerotherapy, have shown similar efficacy in the treatment of VVs compared with more invasive surgical procedures, with lower complication rates and less time lost from work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Callam MJ: Epidemiology of varicose veins. Br J Surg 1994, 81:167–173.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergan JJ, Schmid-Schönbein GW, Smith PD, et al.: Mechanism of disease: chronic venous disease. N Engl J Med 2006, 355:488–498.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartholomew JR, King T, Sahgal A, Vidimos AT: Varicose veins: newer, better treatments available. Cleve Clin J Med 2005, 72:312–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beale RJ, Gough MJ: Treatment options of primary varicose veins: a review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005, 30:83–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rathbun SW, Kirkpatrick AC: Treatment of chronic venous insufficiency. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2007, 9:115–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yao JST: Presidential address: venous disorders—reflections from the past three decades. J Vasc Surg 1997, 26):727–735.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bos RVD, Arends L, Kockaert M, et al.: Endovenous therapies of lower extremity varicosities are at least as effective as surgical stripping or foam sclerotherapy: meta-analysis and meta-regression of case series and randomized clinical trials. J Vasc Surg 2008, In press.

  8. Allegra C, Antignani P, Carlizza A: Recurrent varicose veins following surgical treatment: our experience with five years follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007, 33:751–756.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Miyazaki K, Nishibe T, Sata F, et al.: Long-term results of treatments for varicose veins due to greater saphenous vein insufficiency. Int Angiol 2005, 24:282–286.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Belcaro G, Cesarone MR, Di Renzo A, et al.: Foamsclerotherapy, surgery, sclerotherapy, and combined treatment for varicose veins: a 10-year, prospective, randomized, controlled trial (VEDICO Trial). Angiology 2003, 54:307–315.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hartmann K, Klode J, Pfister R, et al.: Recurrent varicose veins: sonography-based re-examination of 210 patients 14 years after ligation and saphenous vein stripping. Vasa 2006, 35:21–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rigby K, Palfreyman S, Beverley C, Michaels J: Surgery versus sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicose veins. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004, CD004980.

  13. Winterborn RJ, Foy C, Heather BP, Earnshaw JJ: Randomized trial of flush saphenofemoral ligation for primary great saphenous varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008, 36:477–484.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Aremu MA, Mahendran B, Butcher W, et al.: Prospective randomized controlled trial: conventional versus powered phlebectomy. J Vasc Surg 2004, 39:88–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chetter C, Mylankal KJ, Hughes H, Fitridge R. Randomized clinical trial comparing multiple stab incision phlebectomy and transilluminated powered phlebectomy for varicose veins. Br J Surg 2006, 93:169–174.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Scavee V, Lesceu O, Thevs S, et al.: Hook phlebectomy versus transilluminated powered phlebectomy for varicose vein surgery: early results. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003, 25:473–475.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. TenBrook J, Iafrati M, O’Donnell T, et al.: Systematic review of outcomes after surgical management of venous disease incorporating subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery. J Vasc Surg 2004, 39:583–589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sybrandy JEM, van Gent WB, Pierik EGJM, Wittens CHA: Endoscopic versus open subfascial division of incompetent perforating veins in the treatment of venous leg ulceration: long-term follow up. J Vasc Surg 2001, 33:1028–1032.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gloviczki P, Bergan J, Rhodes J, et al.: Mid-term results of endoscopic perforator vein interruption for chronic venous insufficiency: lessons learned from the North American Subfascial Endoscopic Perforator Surgery registry. J Vasc Surg 1999, 29:489–502.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sato DT, Goff CD, Gregory RT, et al.: Subfascial perforator vein ablation: comparison of open versus endoscopic techniques. J Endovasc Surg 1999, 6:147–154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Luebke T, Brunkwall J: Systemic review and meta-analysis of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration, endovenous laser therapy, and foam sclerotherapy for primary varicosities. J Cardiovasc Surg 2008, 49:213–233.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Puggioni A, Kalra M, Carmo M: Endovenous laser treatment and radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein: analysis of early efficacy and complications. J Vasc Surg 2005, 42:488–493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pannier F, Rabe E: Endovenous laser therapy and radiofrequency ablation of saphenous varicose veins. J Cardiovasc Surg 2006, 47:3–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sharif MA, Lau LL, Lee B, et al.: Role of endovenous laser treatment in the management of chronic venous insufficiency. Ann Vasc Surg 2007, 21:551–555.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sadick N: Advances in the treatment of varicose veins: ambulatory phlebectomy, foam sclerotherapy, endovascular laser, and radiofrequency closure. Dermatol Clin 2005, 23:443–455.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Disselhoff BC, Rem AI, Verdaasdonk RM, et al.: Endovenous laser ablation: an experimental study on mechanism of action. Phlebology 2008, 23:69–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Merchant R, Pichot O: Long term outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration of saphenous reflux as a treatment for superficial venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg 2005, 42:502–509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hingorani A, Ascher E, Markevich N, et al.: Deep vein thrombosis after radiofrequency ablation of greater saphenous vein: a word of caution. J Vasc Surg 2004, 40:500–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zan S, Contessa L, Varetto G, et al.: Radiofrequency minimally invasive endovascular treatment of lower limbs varicose veins: clinical experience and literature review. Minerva Cardioangiol 2007, 55:443–458.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Breu F, Guggenbichler S: European Consensus Meeting on Foam Sclerotherapy, April 4–6, 2003, Tegernsee, Germany. Dermatol Surg 2004, 30:709–717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Barrett J, Allen B, Ockelford A, Goldman M: Microfoam ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy of varicose veins in 100 legs. Dermatol Surg 2004, 30:6–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bergan J, Pascarella L, Mekenas L: Venous disorders: treatment with sclerosant foam. J Cardiovasc Surg 2006, 47:9–18.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Coleridge Smith PD: A personal method for foam sclerotherapy: technique and results. In Foam Sclerotherapy A Textbook. Edited by Bergan J, Cheng VL. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press; 2008:71.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Guex J, Allaert F, Gillet J, Chleir F: Immediate and midterm complications of sclerotherapy: report of a prospective multicenter registry of 12,173 sclerotherapy sessions. Dermatol Surg 2005, 31:123–128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Forlee MV, Grouden M, Moore DJ, Shanik G: Stroke after varicose vein foam injection sclerotherapy. J Vasc Surg 2006, 44:225–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bush RG, Derrick M, Manjoney D: Major neurological events following foam sclerotherapy. Phlebology 2008, 23:189–192.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kauvar ANB, Lou WW: Pulsed alexandrite laser for treatment of leg telangiectasias and reticular veins. Arch Dermatol 2000, 136:1371–1375.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sadick NS: A dual wavelength approach for laser/ intense pulsed light source treatment of lower extremity veins. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002, 46:66–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Trelles MA, Allones I, Martin-Vazquez MJ, et al.: Long pulse Nd:YAG laser for treatment of leg veins in 40 patients with assessment at 6 and 12 months. Lasers Surg Med 2004, 35:68–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sadick NS: Laser treatment of leg veins. Skin Therapy Lett 2004, 9:6–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, WP 3010, 920 Stanton L. Young Boulevard, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA

    Suman Rathbun

Authors
  1. Raha Nael
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Suman Rathbun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suman Rathbun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nael, R., Rathbun, S. Treatment of varicose veins. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 11, 91–103 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-009-0010-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-009-0010-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation