Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of conflict of interest on trust in science

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conflicts of interest have an erosive effect on trust in science, damaging first the attitude of the public toward scientists and their research, but also weakening the trusting interdependence of scientists. Disclosure is recognized as the key tool for management of conflicts, but rules with sanctions must be improved, new techniques for avoidance of financial conflicts by alternative funding of evaluative research must be sought, and there must be new thinking about institutional conflicts of interest. Our profession is education, and both the public and research professionals of all ages would benefit from greater understanding of how science should and does work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eichenwald, K.& Kolata, G. (1999) November 30. Hidden interest-a special report; when physicians double as entrepreneurs. NY Times. A1.

  2. Steiner, D. (1996) Competing interests: the need to control conflict of interests in biomedical research. Science & Engineering Ethics 2:457–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shapin, S. (1994) A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-century England. University of Chicago Press.

  4. Lo, B., Wolf, L.E., Berkeley, A. (2000) Conflict-of-interest policies for investigators in clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine 343: 1616–1620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Douglas-Vidas, J., Ferraro, A.& Reichman, M. (2001) Analysis of Guidelines for the Conduct of Research Adopted by Medical Schools or their Components. Office of Research Integrity, Washington, D.C. Contract No. 282-98-0023.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Friedman, P.J. (1992) The troublesome semantics of conflict of interest. Ethics & Behavior 2: 245–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McCrary, S.V., Anderson, C.B., Jakovljevic, J. et al (2000) A national survey of policies on disclosure of conflict of interest in biomedical research. New England Journal of Medicine 343: 1621–1626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Choudhry, N.K., Stelfox, H.T.& Detsky, A.S. (2002) Relationship between authors of clinical practice guidelines and the pharmaceutical industry. JAMA 287: 612–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stelfox, H.T., Chua, G., O'Rourke, K. et al (1998) Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium-channel antagonists. New England Journal of Medicine 338: 101–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yaphe, J., Edman, R., Knishkowy, B. et al (2001) The association between funding by commercial interests and study outcome in randomized controlled drug trials. Family Practice 18: 565–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Korn, D. (2000) Conflicts of interest in biomedical research. JAMA 284: 2234–2237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Greenberg, D.S. (1999) November 30. Turning science into gold. Washington Post. A29.

  13. Emanuel, E.J.& Steiner, D. (1995) Institutional conflict of interest. New England Journal of Medicine 332: 262–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sample, S.B., Smith, L.D., co-chairs, & Task Force on Research Accountability. (2001) Report on Individual and Institutional Financial Conflict of Interest. Association of American Universities, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Friedman, P.J. (1991) Controlling conflict of interest. Issues in Science & Technology 8: 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul J. Friedman MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedman, P.J. The impact of conflict of interest on trust in science. SCI ENG ETHICS 8, 413–420 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0063-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0063-9

Keywords

Navigation