Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Valuation of Forests and Plant Species in Indigenous Territory and National Park Isiboro-Sécure, Bolivia

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Valuation of Forests and Plant Species in Indigenous Territory and National Park Isiboro-Sécure, Bolivia. A quantitative ethnobotanical study was conducted in Indigenous Territory and National Park Isiboro-Sécure (TIPNIS), Bolivia, to assess the usefulness assigned by local Yuracaré and Trinitario ethnic groups to different terra firme and floodplain forests. Furthermore, we investigated which variables are good predictors for the use value attributed to plant species in the research area. Plants were collected during transect, walk-in-the-woods and homegarden sampling. Ethnobotanical and ethnoecological data of the inventoried plants were obtained from 12 Yuracaré and 14 Trinitario participants through semistructured interviews. On average, 84% of species in transects were claimed to be useful to people. The understorey (2.5 cm ≤ dbh < 10 cm) of the sampled forest types contained more useful species than the overstorey (dbh ≥ 10 cm), particularly for species with a medicinal and/or social use function. The local use value of plant species can be predicted, in part, from their botanical family, growth form, density, frequency, mean and maximum dbh, and ecological importance value. Our data confirm the hypothesis that density and frequency of plants in the landscape are both related to perceived plant accessibility. Accessibility of plants partly seems to guide their usefulness in TIPNIS. Indigenous assessment of accessibility and abundance of plants also covaried with their perceived usefulness and therefore has a potential for uncovering patterns in the perceived utility of plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Adu-Tutu, M., Y. Afful, K. Asante-Appiah, D. Lieberman, J. B. Hall, and M. Elvin-Lewis. 1979. Chewing Stick Usage in Southern Ghana. Economic Botany 33:320–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boom, B. 1987. Ethnobotany of the Chacobo Indians. Advances in Economic Botany 4:1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byg, A., J. Vormisto, and H. Balslev. 2006. Using the Useful: Characteristics of Used Palms in South-eastern Ecuador. Environment, Development and Sustainability 8:495–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerón, C. E. and C. Montalvo. 1998. Etnobotanica de los huaorani de Quehueiri-Ono. Napo-Ecuador. Abya-Yala, Quito, Ecuador.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, ———, J. Umenda, and E. U. Chica. 1994. Etnobotanica y notas sobre la diversidad vegetal en la comunidad Cofán de Sinangüe, Sucumbios, Ecuador. EcoCiencia, Quito, Ecuador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, C. R. 1999. 1492 and the Loss of Amazonian Crop Genetic Resources. II. Crop Biogeography at Contact. Economic Botany 53:203–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, F. R. M. 1995. Economic Botany Data Collection Standard. Kew Botanical Gardens, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J. T. and R. P. McIntosh. 1951. An Upland Forest Continuum in the Prairie-Forest Border Region of Wisconsin. Ecology 32:476–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. and J. R. Wagner. 2003. Who Knows? On the Importance of Identifying “Experts” When Researching Local Ecological Knowledge. Human Ecology 31:463–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Walt, S. J., G. Bourdy, L. R. Chávez de Michel, and C. Quenevo. 1999. Ethnobotany of the Tacana: Quantitative Inventories of Two Permanent Plots of Northwestern Bolivia. Economic Botany 53:237–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galeano, G. 2000. Forest Use at the Pacific Coast of Chocó, Colombia: A Quantitative Approach. Economic Botany 54:358–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, A. H. and C. Dodson. 1987. Contribution of Nontrees to Species Richness of a Tropical Rainforest. Biotropica 19:149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S. K. 2000. Human Aspects of Plant Diversity. Economic Botany 54:459–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josse, C., G. Navarro, F. Encarnación, A. Tovar, P. Comer, W. Ferreira, F. Rodríguez, J. Saito, J. Sanjurjo, J. Dyson, E. Rubin de Celis, R. Zárate, J. Chang, M. Ahuite, C. Vargas, F. Paredes, W. Castro, J. Maco, and F. Reátegui. 2007. Ecological Systems of the Amazon Basin of Peru and Bolivia. Classification and Mapping. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, A., O. L. Phillips, A. Reategui Ismodes, M. Lopez, S. Rose, D. Wood, and A. José Farfan. 2005. Local Values for Harvested Forest Plants in Madre de Dios, Peru: Towards a More Contextualised Interpretation of Quantitative Ethnobotanical Data. Biodiversity and Conservation 14:45–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, W., R. P. Miller, S. R. Pollard, and E. V. Wandelli. 1992. Ethnobotany of Waimiri Atroari Indians of Brasil. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerman, D. E., R. W. Pemberton, D. Kiefer, and B. Berlin. 1999. A Comparative Analysis of Five Medicinal Floras. Journal of Ethnobiology 19:49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori, S. A., B. M. Boom, A. M. de Carvalino, and T. S. dos Santos. 1983. Ecological Importance of Myrtaceae in an Eastern Brazilian Wet Forest. Biotropica 15:68–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, G. 2002. Vegetación y unidades biogeográficas. Pages 1–500 in G. Navarro and M. Maldonado, eds., Geografía ecológica de Bolivia: Vegetación y ambientes acuáticos. Centro de Ecología Simón I. Patino, Cochabamba, Bolivia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, O. L. and A. H. Gentry. 1993a. The Useful Plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. Statistical Hypotheses Tests with a New Quantitative Technique. Economic Botany 47:15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— and ———. 1993b. The Useful Plants of Tambopata, Peru: II. Additional Hypotheses Testing in Quantitative Ethnobotany. Economic Botany 47:33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, ———, C. Reynel, P. Wilkin, and B. C. Galvez-Durand. 1994. Quantitative Ethnobotany and Amazonian Conservation. Conservation Biology 8:225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———, M. R. Vásquez, V. P. Núńez, A. Lorenzo Monteagudo, M.-E. Chuspe Zans, W. Galiano Sánchez, A. Peńa Cruz, M. Timana, M. Yli-Halla, and S. Rose 2003. Efficient Plot-Based Floristic Assessment of Tropical Forests. Journal of Tropical Ecology 19:629–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piñedo-Vasquez, M., D. Zarin, P. Jipp, and J. Chota-Inuma. 1990. Use-Values of Tree Species in a Communal Forest Reserve in Northeast Peru. Conservation Biology 4:405–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prance, G. T., W. Balée, B. M. Boom, and R. L. Carneiro. 1987. Quantitative Ethnobotany and the Case for Conservation in Amazonia. Conservation Biology 1:296–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Querejazu, R. L. 2005. La cultura de los Yuracarés, su hábitat y su proceso de cambio. Impresiones Poligraf, Cochabamba, Bolivia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico Pareja, A., T. Beetstra, and F. M. Rocha Torrez. 2005. Atlas del trópico de Cochabamba. Talleres Gráficos “KIPUS”, Cochabamba, Bolivia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepp, J. R. and D. E. Moerman. 2001. The Importance of Weeds in Ethnopharmacology. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 75:19–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, E. 2009 New Light on the Floristic Composition and Diversity of Indigenous Territory and National Park Isiboro-Sécure, Bolivia. Biodiversity and Conservation (in press; doi:10.1007/s10531–008–9561–7).

  • ——— and I. Vandebroek. 2006. Guía de plantas medicinales de los Yuracarés y Trinitarios del Territorio Indígena Parque Nacional Isiboro-Sécure, Bolivia. Imprenta Sirena, Santa Cruz, Bolivia.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, ———, and P. Van Damme. 2007. What Works in the Field? A Comparison of Different Interviewing Methods in Ethnobotany with Special Reference to the Use of Photographs. Economic Botany 61:376–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———, ———, P. Goetghebeur, S. Sanca, S. Arrázola, and P. Van Damme. 2008. The Relationship between Plant Use and Plant Diversity in the Bolivian Andes, with Special Reference to Medicinal Plant Use. Human Ecology 36:861–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———, ———, S. Sanca, and P. Van Damme. 2009a. Cultural Significance of Medicinal Plant Families and Species among Quechua Farmers in Apillapampa, Bolivia. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 122:60–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ———, ———, P. Van Damme, P. Goetghebeur, D. Douterlungne, S. Sanca, and S. Arrazola. 2009b The Relation between Accessibility, Diversity and Indigenous Valuation of Vegetation in the Bolivian Andes. Journal of Arid Environments (in press; doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.03.010).

  • ———, ———, ———, L. Semo and Z. Noza. 2009c. Susto Etiology and Treatment According to Bolivian Trinitario People: a “Masters of the Animal Species” Phenomenon. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 23 (in press; to be published in the 3rd issue).

  • Toledo, M. and J. Salick. 2006. Secondary Succession and Indigenous Management in Semideciduous Forest Fallows of the Amazon Basin. Biotropica 38:161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torre-Cuadros, M. and G. A. Islebe. 2003. Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Use of Vegetation in Southeastern Mexico: A Case Study from Solferino, Quintana Roo. Biodiversity and Conservation 12:2455–2476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, N. J. 1988. “The Importance of a Rose”: Evaluating the Cultural Significance of Plants in Thompson and Lillooet Interior Salish. American Anthropologist 90:272–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Andel, T. 2000. Non-timber Forest Products of the North-West District of Guyana: Part I. Tropenbos-Guyana Series 8B. PrintPartners Ipskamp B.V., The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voeks, R. A. 2004. Disturbance Pharmacopoeias: Medicine and Myth from the Humid Tropics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94:868–888.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present research was financed by a doctoral research grant of the Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds (BOF) of Ghent University to Evert Thomas (Grant Number: B/03801/01 FONDS IV 1). Logistic support in Bolivia was provided by the Centre of Biodiversity and Genetics and the Herbarium Martin Cardenas of the Universidad Mayor de San Simon in Cochabamba. We are grateful to Kim Torfs, Anouk Floren, Bert Wallyn, Jurgen Ceuppens, Reynaldo Berdeja, Roxana Baldelomar, Thiago Agustin, and Noel Altamirano for collaboration during data collection. Special thanks are due to all inhabitants of the indigenous communities San Jose de la Angosta, San Antonio, El Carmen de la Nueva Esperanza, Tres de Mayo, and Sanandita for their kind assistance in this project. We are also indebted to the professional botanists who identified many of the collections. They are P. Acevedo, W. Anderson, G. Aymard, S. Beck, C. Berg, R. Bianchini, A. Brant, T. Croat, D. Daly, S. Dressler, H.-J. Esser, R. Fortunato, A. Fuentes, R. Oritiz Gentry, C. Gustafsson, B. Holst, I. Jiménez, J. Kallunki, Liesner, R., L. Lohmann, J. Lombardi, P. Maas, J. Mitchel, M. Moraes, S. Mori, M. Nee, T. Pennington, G. Prance, J. Pruski, N. Raes, H. Rainer, S. Renner, J. Ricketson, L. Rico, C. Stace, C. Taylor, H. van der Werff, T. Wayt, J. Wen, J. Wood and F. Zenteno.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evert Thomas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, E., Vandebroek, I. & Van Damme, P. Valuation of Forests and Plant Species in Indigenous Territory and National Park Isiboro-Sécure, Bolivia. Econ Bot 63, 229–241 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-009-9084-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-009-9084-5

Key Words

Navigation