Skip to main content
Log in

Shared and Separate Knowledge among Eight Cultural Groups Based on Ethnobotanical Uses of Rhododendron (Ericaceae) in Yunnan Province, China

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shared and Separate Knowledge among Eight Cultural Groups Based on Ethnobotanical Uses of Rhododendron (Ericaceae) in Yunnan Province, China. Yunnan, a province in southwest China, is known for its cultural diversity of 25 ethnic minorities and its vast Himalayan biodiversity, especially of Rhododendron. Previous literature has shown that some cultural groups share ethnobotanical knowledge while other cultural groups keep their knowledge separate. We investigated factors that may lead to the sharing of knowledge based on the uses of rhododendron among seven cultural minorities (the Bai, Dulong, Lisu, Naxi, Nu, Tibetan, and Yi) and the Han majority. Semistructured interviews about rhododendrons were conducted with approximately 30 individuals in each cultural group. Cluster analyses and a new analysis method were conducted to determine the within-group homogeneity of knowledge of rhododendron uses to test hypotheses related to strength of cultural traditions. The Dulong, Lisu, and Nu were compared with each other as these groups share villages and languages. The Naxi, Tibetan, and Yi live predominantly with members of their cultural group, and are often monolingual; thus, these three cultural minorities were compared. The Bai and Han compose the final comparison as the Bai are increasingly interacting with the local Han majority as tourism grows in that area. The Bai, Dulong, Han, Lisu, and Nu had variable answers within each group, while the Naxi, Tibetan, and Yi have homogeneous knowledge of uses of rhododendron within their cultural group. Among the eight cultural groups compared for this study, factors such as sharing of language, overlap of living situation, and sharing of markets leads to non-homogenous knowledge of rhododendron uses among members of the same cultural group.

中国云南省八个民族对杜鹃花属植物认识与利用的共性及差异.

中国南部的云南省位于喜马拉雅区域,拥有25个少数民族,以其丰富的文化多样性和以杜鹃花属植物为代表的生物多样性闻名于世。前人的研究表明一些民族之间在民族植物学的常识方面存在共性,而另一些民族在这些方面却有独立的认识。通过对每个民族中约30人的半结构访谈,我们在七个少数民族(白族、独龙族、傈僳族、纳西族、怒族、藏族、彝族)和人数众多的汉族共八个民族之间进行了杜鹃花利用方式和此类知识在民族之间共享原因的调查。聚类分析和一种新的分析方法被用于评估同种民族内杜鹃花利用方式和相关知识的差异程度,以显示对文化传统的继承强度。独龙族、傈僳族和怒族因具有共同居住的村庄和共通的语言,因此对三者进行比较。纳西族、藏族和彝族各自为居,并且有独立的语言,因此在它们之间进行比较。另外比较的是白族和汉族,随着当地旅游业的发展,白族越来越多的与汉族之间产生相互影响。结果表明,白族、独龙族、汉族、傈僳族和怒族在本民族内部对于杜鹃花属植物有多样化的认识和不同的利用方式;而纳西族、藏族、彝族对杜鹃花属植物的认识和利用具有民族内部的一致性。在本研究涉及的八个民族中,语言共通程度、居住地重叠、共用农贸市场等因素导致了相同民族内部对杜鹃花属植物认识和利用的差异。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Bradley, D. 1997. Tibeto-Burman languages and classification. In: Papers in southeast Asian linguistics. No. 14. Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayas. Pacific Linguistics, Australia.

  • Campas, M. T. and C. Ehringhaus. 2003. Plant virtues are in the eyes of the beholders: A comparison of known palm uses among indigenous and folk communities of southwest Amazonia. Economic Botany 57(3):324–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. and R. N. Gorley. 2006. Primer. V. 6. www.primer-e.com/primer.html.

  • Ellena, R., C. L. Quave, and A. Pieroni. 2012. Comparative medical ethnobotany of the Senegalese community living in Turin (northwestern Italy) and in Adeane (southern Senegal). Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Article ID 604363.

  • Fang, M. Y., R. Z. Fang, M. Y. He, H. B. Yang, and D. F. Chamberlain. 2005. Rhododendron. In: Flora of China. Vol. 14 (Apiaceae through Ericaceae), eds. Z. Y. Wu, P. H. Raven and D. Y. Hong. Beijing: Science Press, and St. Louis, Missouri: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.

  • Fowler, C. S. 2000. “We live by them:” Native knowledge of biodiversity in the Great Basin of Western North America. Pages 99–132 in P. E. Minnis and W. J. Elisens, eds., Biodiversity and Native America. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Baggethun, E., S. Mingorria, V. Reyes-Garcia, L. Clavet, and C. Montes. 2010. Traditional ecological knowledge trends in the transition to a market economy: Empirical study in the Doñana natural areas. Conservation Biology 24(3):721–729.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J. 2008. The exploration of Yunnan. Yunnan People’s Publishing House, Yunnan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, S. 2001. Perspectives on the Yi of southwest China. Introduction. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huai, H. Y., W. Xu, G. J. Wen, and W. R. Bai. 2011. Comparison of the homegardens of eight cultural groups in Jinping County, SW China. Economic Botany 65(4):345–355.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jernigan, K. 2012. Plants with histories: The changing ethnobotany of Iquito speakers of the Peruvian Amazon. Economic Botany 66(1):46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koca, I. and A. F. Koca. 2007. Poisoning by mad honey: A brief review. Food Chemistry Toxicology 45(8):1315–1318.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kunwar, R. M., B. K. Nepal, H. B. Kshhertri, S. K. Rai, and R. W. Bussmann. 2006. Ethnomedicine in Himalaya: A case study from Dolpa, Humla, Jumla and Mustang districts of Nepal. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2(27).

  • Luo, R. F. 1995. The Dulong, face tattooed women in nature. Yunnan Education Press, Yunnan, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillen, H. 2012. Ethnobotanical knowledge transmission and evolution: The case of medicinal markets in Tanga, Tanzania. Economic Botany 66(2):121–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N., R. A. Mittermeier, C. G. Mittermeier, G. A. da Fonesca, and J. Kent. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pei, S. J. 1989. Traditional culture of flower eating on Rhododendron and Bauhinia in Yunnan, China. Proceeding of the International Symposium of Flower-Eating Culture in Asia.

  • Pieroni, M., M. E. Guisti, and C. L. Quave. 2011. Cross-cultural ethnobiology in the western Balkans: Medical ethnobotany and ethnozoology among Albanians and Serbs in the Pester Plateau, Sandzak, southwestern Serbia. Human Ecology 39:333–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Garcia, V. 2001. Indigenous people, ethnobotanical knowledge, and market economy. A case study of the Tsimane’ Amerindians in lowland Bolivia. Ph.D. thesis, University of Florida.

  • ———, V. Vadez, E. Byron, L. Apaza, W. R. Leonard, E. Perez, and D. Wilkie. 2005. Market economy and the loss of folk knowledge of plant uses: Estimates from the Tsimane’ of the Bolivian Amazon. Current Anthropology 46(4):651–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romney, A. K., S. C. Weller, and W. H. Batchelder. 1986. Culture as a consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist New Series 88(2):313–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, S. C., A. Wilkes, J. Qian, L. Yin, J. Ren, and F. D. Zhang. 2010a. Agrobiodiversity and biocultural heritage in the Dulong Valley, China. Mountain Research and Development 30(3):205–211.

  • ———, J. Qian, and J. Ren. 2010b. Ethnoveterinary plant remedies used by Nu People in NW Yunnan of China. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 6(24).

  • Skinner, C. M. 1903. Bloody-heart rhododendrons. American myths and legends. Vol. 1. J. B. Lippincott Co, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weckerle, C. S., R. Ineichen, F. K. Huber, and Y. P. Yang. 2009. Mao’s heritage: Medicinal plant knowledge among Bai in Shaxi, China, at a crossroads between distinct local and common widespread practice. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 123(2):213–228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zarger, R. K. and J. R. Stepp. 2004. Persistence of botanical knowledge among Tzeltal Maya Children. Current Anthropology 45(3):413–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zent, S. 2001. Acculturation and ethnobotanical knowledge loss among the Piaroa of Venezuela: A demonstration of a quantitative method of the empirical study of traditional environmental knowledge change. Pages 190–211 in L. Maffi, ed., On biocultural diversity: Linkage language, knowledge, and the environment. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

E.G. thanks the ethnic groups of Yunnan Province for participation in these interviews, graciously welcoming me into their homes and becoming my dear friends. E.G. thanks the many field assistants involved, here kept anonymous, for their tireless work in often less than ideal conditions. The manuscript was improved by suggestions from members of the Emshwiller lab, colleagues in China and the U.S.A., family members, and two anonymous reviewers. This dissertation research was supported by grants to E.G. from the Botany Department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, a Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Development in Southwest China NSF-IGERT traineeship and individual grant (DGE#0549369), an NSF GRFP fellowship, and a National Geographic Young Explorer Grant (9009-11).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Georgian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Georgian, E., Emshwiller, E. Shared and Separate Knowledge among Eight Cultural Groups Based on Ethnobotanical Uses of Rhododendron (Ericaceae) in Yunnan Province, China. Econ Bot 67, 191–202 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-013-9235-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-013-9235-6

Key Words

Navigation