Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Family matters: examining a multi-family group intervention for women with BRCA mutations in the scope of genetic counselling

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Community Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The availability of family-centred services for women genetically at-risk for breast and ovarian cancer (BRCA) due to deleterious genetic mutations is still scarce, despite the distress that these women and their families may experience. This study describes a multi-family group intervention for women who tested positive for BRCA mutations and their families. Methods include a time-limited psycho-educational programme involving educational and support components and consisting of four semi-structured multi-family sessions. Three families (a total of nine people) attended the programme in genetic counselling for hereditary cancers at a Portuguese public hospital. A focus group interview was performed 1 month after the last session to assess both the practical and the psychosocial impacts and to collect suggestions from participants. The present paper focuses on the practical aspects of the intervention, its development and its evaluation. Participants reported that the programme is well-structured and that responds to the needs of patients and their families by improving coping skills and medical awareness in the adaptation to genetic illness. Results reinforce the need to integrate psychosocial and family-oriented interventions in genetic counselling, addressing the holistic experience of hereditary disease. Recommendations for enhancing the services available are provided. The multi-family discussion group, combining educative and supportive services with a family focus, can be successfully adapted in genetic counselling protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. All participants’ names have been changed for confidentiality purposes.

References

  • Cappelli M, Esplen MJ, Wilson B, Dorval M, Bottorff J, Ly M, Carroll J et al (2009) Identifying mental health services in clinical genetic settings. Clin Genet 76(4):326–331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chiquelho R, Neves S, Mendes Á, Relvas A, Sousa L (2010) Pro-families: a psycho-educational multifamily group intervention for cancer patients and their families. Eur J Cancer Care. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01154.x

  • Douma KFL, Aaronson NK, Vasen HFA, Bleiker EMA (2008) Psychosocial issues in genetic testing for familial adenomatous polyposis: a review of the literature. Psychooncology 17:737–745

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Esplen M, Hunter J, Leszcz M, Warner E, Narod S, Metcalfe K et al (2004) A multicenter study of supportive–expressive group therapy for women with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. Cancer 101:2327–2340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evers-Kiebooms G, Welkenhysen M, Claes E, Decruyenaere M, Denayer L (2000) The psychological complexity of predictive testing for late onset neurogenetic diseases and hereditary cancers. Soc Sci Med 51:831–841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez S, Steinglass P (2002) Application of multifamily groups in chronic medical disorders. In: McFarlane W (ed) Multifamily groups in the treatment of severe psychiatric disorders. Guilford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Health General Directory (2004) Rede de referenciação hospitalar de genética médica. Direcção-Geral da Saúde, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp J, Brown K, Sullivan M, Massie M (1999) The prophylactic mastectomy dilemma: a support group for women at high genetic risk for breast cancer. J Genet Couns 8(3):163–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger R, Casey M (2000) Focus groups. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister M, Payne K, Nicholls S, McLeod R, Donnai D, Davies L (2007) Improving service evaluation in clinical genetics: identifying effects of genetic diseases on individuals and families. J Genet Couns 16(1):71–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel S (2005) The psychotherapy of genetics. Fam Proc 44(1):25–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel S, Campbell T, Hepworth J, Lorenz A (2005) Family-oriented primary care. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel S, Rolland J, Feetham S, Miller S (2006) It runs in the family: family system concepts and genetically linked disorders. In: Miller S, McDaniel S, Rolland J, Feetham S (eds) Individuals, families, and the new era of genetics. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendes Á, Santos TA, Sousa L (2010) Experiencing genetic counselling for hereditary cancers: the client’s perspective. Eur J Cancer Care. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2010.01201.x

  • National Society of Genetic Counselors (2006) Fact sheet for the NSGC. http://www.nsgc.org/news/mediakit/factsheet.cfm

  • Ostroff J, Ross S, Steinglass P, Ronis-Tobin V, Singh B (2004) Interest in and barriers to participation in multiple groups among head and neck cancer survivors and their primary family caregiver. Fam Proc 43(2):195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasacreta J (2003) Psychosocial issues associated with genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk: an integrative review. Cancer Investig 21(4):588–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patenaude A (2005) Genetic testing for cancer: psychological approaches for helping patients and families. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson J, Garwick A (1994) The impact of chronic illness on families: a family systems perspective. Ann Behav Med 16:131–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson S (2005) The role of the family in genetic testing: theoretical perspectives, current knowledge, and future directions. Health Educ Behav 32(5):627–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piercy F, Hertlein K (2005) Focus groups in family therapy research. In: Sprankle D, Piercy F (eds) Research methods in family therapy. Guilford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransom S, Azzarello L, McMillan S (2006) Methodological issues in the recruitment of cancer pain patients and their caregivers. Res Nurs Health 29(3):190–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rolland J, Williams J (2006) Toward a psychosocial model for the new era of genetics. In: Miller S, McDaniel S, Rolland J, Feetham S (eds) Individuals, families, and the new era of genetics. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlich-Bakker K, Ten Kroode H, Ausems M (2006) A literature review of the psychological impact of genetic testing on breast cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns 62(1):13–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sifri R, Gangadharappa S, Acheson L (2004) Identifying and testing for hereditary susceptibility to common cancers. Cancer J Clinic 54(6):309–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel S, Cowan D (2000) The process of family reconstruction after DNA testing for Huntington disease. J Genet Couns 9(3):237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speice J, McDaniel S, Rowley P, Loader S (2002) Family issues in a psychoeducation group for women with a BRCA mutation. Clin Genet 62:121–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trees A, Koenig Kellas J, Roche M (2010) Family narratives. In: Gaff C, Bylund C (eds) Family communication about genetics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner-Lin A (2008) Formal and informal support needs of young women with BRCA mutations. J Psychosoc Oncol 26(4):111–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Foundation for Science and Technology (SFRH/BD/38773/2007). The authors express gratitude to participant families, who made possible this study, and appreciate the valuable support from the Hereditary Tumours Consultation staff, Centre for Medical Genetics and Human Reproduction of the University Hospital of Coimbra, Portugal, in particular to Odete Albuquerque for help in recruiting study participants. Thanks to Milena Paneque for providing data about how genetics services are organized in Portugal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Álvaro Mendes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mendes, Á., Chiquelho, R., Santos, T.A. et al. Family matters: examining a multi-family group intervention for women with BRCA mutations in the scope of genetic counselling. J Community Genet 1, 161–168 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-010-0022-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-010-0022-0

Keywords

Navigation