Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

New slack model based efficiency assessment of public sector hospitals of Uttarakhand: state of India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The total potentials for improvement in the efficiency of a DMU frequently remain unrevealed by calculating radial efficiency measure by basic data envelopment analysis (DEA) models. This paper, therefore, applies a new slack model (NSM) of DEA, which directly deals with input and output slacks, to assess the efficiency of 27 public sector hospitals of State of Uttarakhand (India) for the calendar year 2011. The study is undertaken with three inputs: number of beds, number of doctors and number of paramedical staff (PMS) and four outputs: number of outdoor-patients and number of indoor-patients including two case-mix outputs: number of major surgery and number of minor surgery received. The data for the study have been collected from the Directorate of Medical Health and Family Welfare, Government of Uttarakhand, Dehradun, India. The paper concludes that overall technical efficiency of average hospitals in the State is only 55.90 % which indicates that the hospitals have a high potential for improvement. Region-wise efficiency analysis reveals that the hospitals of Garhwal region are found to achieve relatively better efficiency score than their counterparts of Kumaon region. To examine the robustness of the results, sensitivity analysis is also conducted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal S, Yadav SP, Singh SP (2006) Assessment of relative efficiencies of private sector hospitals in India. J Math Syst Sci 2(1):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal S, Yadav SP, Singh SP (2007) DEA technique based assessment of efficiencies of the government hospitals of Uttaranchal (India). Int J Econ Res 4(1):25–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal S, Yadav SP, Singh SP (2010) DEA based estimation of the technical efficiency of state transport undertakings in India. OPSEARCH 47(3):216–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal S, Yadav SP, Singh SP (2011) A new slack DEA model to estimate the impact of slacks on the efficiencies. Int J Oper Res 12(3):241–256

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal S, Yadav SP, Singh SP (2013) Sensitivity analysis in data envelopment analysis. Int J Oper Res (in press)

  • Andersen P, Petersen NC (1993) A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 39(10):1261–1264

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for the estimation of technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 30(9):1078–1092

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–441

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Wei QL, Huang ZM (1989) Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi objective programming. Int J Syst Sci 20(7):1099–1118

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (1997) Data envelopment analysis a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA solver software. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash U, Vaishnavi SD, Muraleedharan VR (2010) Technical efficiency and scale efficiency of district hospitals: a case study. J Health Manag 12(3):231–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economic survey 2011–2012, Government of India. http://indiabudget.nic.in/index.asp

  • Farell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc Ser A 120(3):253–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosskopf S, Valdmains V (1993) Evaluating hospital performance with case-mix-adjusted outputs. Med Care 31(6):525–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibiki N, Sueyoshi T (1999) DEA sensitivity analysis by changing a reference set: regional contribution to Japanese industrial development. Int J Manag Sci 27(2):139–153

    Google Scholar 

  • India budget. http://indiabudget.nic.in/es2011-12/echap-13.pdf

  • Ismile MA (2010) Technical efficiency of Sudan’s health institutions: a state level analysis. Sudan J Public Health 5(3):122–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahanshahloo GR, Junior HV, Lotfi FH, Akbarian D (2007) A new DEA ranking system based on changing a reference set. Eur J Oper Res 181(1):331–337

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jandaghi G, Matin HZ, Doremami M, Aghaziyarati M (2010) Efficiency evaluation of Qom public and private hospitals using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Econ Finance Adm Sci 7(22):83–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirigia JM, Emrouznejad A, Cassoma B, Asbu EZ, Barry S (2008) A performance assessment method for hospitals: the case of municipal hospitals in Angola. J Med Syst 32(6):509–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmana CM (2010) A study on healthcare infrastructure for children in Karnataka: a district-wise analysis. J Health Manag 12(4):423–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirmirani S (2008) Health care efficiency in transition economics: an application of data envelopment analysis. Int Bus Econ Res J 7(2):47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogha SK, Yadav SP, Singh SP (2012) Performance evaluation of Indian private hospitals using DEA approach with sensitivity analysis. Int J Adv Manag Econ 1(2):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullar J (2008) Efficiency vectors, efficiency and performance measures: new methods for ranking efficient organization units. J Prod Anal 30(2):99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan R (2003) An introduction to data envelopment analysis. Sage Publication India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi T, Ohnishi K, Kinase Y (1999) A benchmark approach for baseball evaluation. Eur J Oper Res 115(3):429–448

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tone K (2001) A slack based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130(3):498–509

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tyagi P, Yadav SP, Singh SP (2009) Relative performance of academic departments using DEA with sensitivity analysis. Eval Program Plan 32(2):168–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyson LDA (2002) For developing countries, health is wealth. Business week. http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2002-01-13/for-developing-countries-health-is-wealth

  • Uttarakhand annual report 2011–2012. http://moef.nic.in/report/1112/AR-11-12-En.pdf

  • Uttarakhand at a glance 2010–2011. http://planningcommission.nic.in/plans/stateplan/present/Uttarakhand.pdf

  • Uttarakhand Health and Family Welfare Society, PIP-2011–2012. http://pipnrhm-mohfw.nic.in/index_files/high_focus_non_ne/Uk/ufpip.pdf

  • Population commotion Government of Uttarakhand. http://populationcommission.nic.in/cont-en-ut.htm

  • Population commotion Government of India. http://www.indiaonlinepages.com/population/literacy-rate-in-india.html

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author is thankful to the University Grant Commission (UGC) New Delhi, India for providing financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandeep Kumar Mogha.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Some definitions

  1. (1)

    Overall Technical Efficiency (OTE): The efficiency score evaluated from CCR model is defined as OTE. It reflects the ability of a hospital to obtain the maximum outputs from the given set of inputs.

  2. (2)

    Pure Technical Efficiency (PTE): The efficiency score evaluated from BCC model is defined as PTE. It refers to the proportion of OTE which is attributed to the efficient conversion of inputs into outputs given the scale size.

  3. (3)

    Scale Efficiency (SE): The SE is defined as the ratio of OTE to PTE. It measures the impact of scale size on the efficiency of a hospital.

  4. (4)

    Efficient Hospital: A hospital is said to be efficient if and only if \(\theta^{*}\,=\,1\) and slacks \(s_{i}^{ - *}\,=\,s_{r}^{ + *}=0\, \forall \,i,\,\,r;\) otherwise it is called inefficient.

  5. (5)

    Peer: A peer is an efficient hospital which acts as a reference point for inefficient hospitals.

  6. (6)

    Peer Count: The frequency of an efficient hospital H occurring in all reference sets except the reference set of H is called the peer count.

  7. (7)

    Peer Weight: The multiplier value (\(\lambda\)-value) of an efficient hospital H which makes a reference set for an inefficient hospital is called the peer weight.

  8. (8)

    Reference Set: A set of efficient hospitals whose combination makes an inefficient hospital efficient is called the reference Set.

  9. (9)

    Slacks: The quantity of excess resources used and deficient outputs produced by an inefficient hospital to become efficient after radial change to reach the efficiency frontier are known as input slacks and output slacks respectively.

Appendix 2

See Table 8

Table 8 List of selected hospitals of Uttarakhand State

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mogha, S.K., Yadav, S.P. & Singh, S.P. New slack model based efficiency assessment of public sector hospitals of Uttarakhand: state of India. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 5, 32–42 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-013-0207-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-013-0207-0

Keywords

Navigation