Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transboundary Socio-Ecological Effects of a Marine Protected Area in the Southwest Atlantic

  • Published:
AMBIO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) have been regarded as an alternative to protect natural resources and to improve fisheries. However, MPAs may also have negative socio-economic consequences on fishing communities. We aimed to check the effectiveness of a socially conflicting MPA in Brazil by assessing target reef fish biomass in islands inside (n = 6) and outside (n = 6) the MPA, fisheries’ productivity (biomass), catch per unit of effort (CPUE), and fishers’ socio-economic status (mainly fishers’ income) in three fishing communities subjected to different degrees of influence (close, average, and long distance) of the MPA. The CPUE was higher in the fishing community that was further away from the MPA, fish biomass was higher in the islands located inside the MPA in the southern region and in the islands located outside the MPA in the northern region, while fishers were making the most money closest to the MPA, where conflicts are the highest, probably from practicing very intensive fisheries. This integrated approach showed that the studied MPA has not delivered ecological benefits, such as higher CPUE or more fish, while higher income closer to the MPA could not be clearly attributed to its effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, A.B., and K.Y. Lee. 1995. Chenderoh Reservoir, Malaysia: A characterization of a small-scale, multigear and multispecies artisanal fishery in the tropics. Fisheries Research 23: 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, E.H., and F. Ellis. 2001. The livelihoods approach and management of small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy 25: 377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begossi, A. 2010. Small-scale fisheries in Latin America: Management models and challenges. MAST 9: 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begossi, A., P.F.M. Lopes, L.E.C. Oliveira, and H. Nakano. 2010. Ecologia de Pescadores da Baia de Ilha Grande. Sao Carlos: Editora Rima.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begossi, A., P. May, P.F.M. Lopes, L.E.C. Oliveira, V. Vinha, and R. Silvano. 2011. Compensation for environmental services from artisanal fisheries in SE Brazil: Policy and technical strategies. Ecological Economics 71: 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begossi, A., S.V. Salivonchyk, T. Barreto, V. Nora, and R.A.M. Silvano. 2012a. Small-scale Fisheries and Conservation of Dusky Grouper Garoupa), Epinephelus marginatus (Lowe, 1834) in the Southeastern Brazilian Coast. Science Journal of Agricultural Research and Management 2012. doi:10.7237/sjarm/174.

  • Begossi, A., S. Salyvonchyk, V. Nora, P.F.M. Lopes, and R.A.M. Silvano. 2012b. The Paraty artisanal fishery (southeastern Brazilian coast): Ethnoecology and management of a social-ecological system (SES). Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 8: 22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., R. Mahon, P. McConney, R. Pollnac, and R. Pomeroy. 2006. Gestão da pesca de pequena escala: Diretrizes e metodos alternativos. Rio Grande: Editora Furg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camargo, C., J.H. Maldonado, E. Alvarado, R. Moreno-Sánchez, S. Mendoza, N. Manrique, A. Mogollón, J.D. Osorio, et al. 2009. Community involvement in management for maintaining coral reef resilience and biodiversity in southern Caribbean marine protected areas. Biodiversity Conservation 18: 935–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castilla, J.C., S. Gelcich, and O. Defeo. 2007. Successes, lessons, and projections from Experience in marine benthic invertebrate artisanal fisheries in Chile. In Fisheries management progess towards sustainability, ed. T.R. McClanahan and J.C. Castilla, 25–42. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Clarke, K.R., and R.M. Warwick. 2001. Change in marine communities: An approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Plymouth: Plymouth Marine Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, C., D. Ovando, R. Hilborn, S.D. Gaines, O. Deschenes, and S.E. Lester. 2012. Status and solutions for the World’s unassessed fisheries. Science 338: 517–520.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, B.R., A. Siahainenia, C. Rotinsulu, and A. Sukmara. 2004. Compliance and enforcement of community-based coastal resource management regulations in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Coastal Management 32: 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, M.J. 2007. The R Book. West Sussex: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crona, B., M. Nystrom, C. Folke, and N. Jiddawi. 2010. Middlemen, a critical social-ecological link in coastal communities of Kenya and Zanzibar. Marine Policy 34: 761–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diegues, A. 1999. Human populations and coastal wetlands: Conservation and management in Brazil. Ocean Coastal Management 42: 187–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diegues, A.C. 2008. Marine protected areas and artisanal fisheries in Brazil. Chennai: Samudra Monograph, International Collective in Support of Fishworkers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P., and M.W. Palmer. 2003. Vegan, a package of R functions for community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 14: 927–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R., and G.R. Russ. 2004. Larger biomass of targeted reef fish in no-take marine reserves on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Aquatic Conservation: Marine Freshwater Ecosystems 14: 505–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 2012. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2012. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francini-Filho, R.B., and R.L. Moura. 2008. Evidence for spillover of reef fishes from a no-take marine reserve: An evaluation using the before-after control-impact (BACI) approach. Fisheries Research 93: 346–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froese, R., and D. Pauly, eds. 2011. Fishbase. World Wide Web electronic publication.

  • Gell, F., and C.M. Roberts. 2003. Benefits beyond boundaries: The fishery effects of marine reserves. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18: 448–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, N.L., R. Hilborn, and O. Defeo. 2011. Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature 2: 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN. 2013. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.1. Downloaded on 02 July 2013.

  • Jagers, S.C., D. Berlin, and S. Jentoft. 2012. Why comply? Attitudes towards harvest regulations among Swedish fishers. Marine Policy 36: 969–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S., and B.J. McCay. 1995. User participation in fisheries management: Lessons drawn from international experiences. Marine Policy 19: 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Fur, J., A. Guilavogui, and A. Teitelbaum. 2011. Contribution of local fishermen to improving knowledge of the marine ecosystem and resources in the Republic of Guinea, West Africa. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 68: 1454–1469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, P.F.M., R.A.M. Silvano, and A. Begossi. 2011. Extractive and Sustainable Development Reserves in Brazil: Resilient alternatives to fisheries? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54: 421–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, P.F.M., E.M. Rosa, S. Salyvonchyk, V. Nora, and A. Begossi. 2013. Suggestions for fixing top-down coastal fisheries management through participatory approaches. Marine Policy 40: 100–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks, L. 2007. Patterns of fisheries institutional failure and success: Experience from the Southern Gulf of St. Lawrence snow crab fishery, in Nova Scotia, Canada. Marine Policy 31: 320–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly, B.F.J. 1997. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCay, B.J. 1978. Systems ecology, people ecology, and the anthropology of fishing communities. Human Ecology 6: 397–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J.R., and C. Mathiesen. 2003. Important factors influencing rule compliance in fisheries lessons from Denmark. Marine Policy 27: 409–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, D. 2006. Major trends in small-scale marine fisheries, with emphasis on developing countries, and some implications for the social sciences. Maritime Studies 4: 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontecorvo, G., and W.E. Schrank. 2001. A small core fishery: A new approach to fisheries management. Marine Policy 25: 43–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org.

  • Rosemberg, A.A. 2003. Managing to the margins: The overexploitation of fisheries. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 102–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadovy, Y. 2001. The threat of fishing to highly fecund fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 59: 90–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas, S., R. Chuenpagdee, J.C. Seijo, and A. Charles. 2007. Challenges in the assessment and management of small-scale fisheries in Latin America and the Caribbean. Fisheries Research 87: 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sale, P.F., R.K. Cowen, B.S. Danilowicz, G.P. Jones, J.P. Kritzer, K.C. Lindeman, S. Planes, N.V.C. Polunin, et al. 2005. Critical science gaps impede use of no-take fishery reserves. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20: 74–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, A., K. Bonzon, R. Fujita, N. Benjamin, N. Woodling, P. Black, and C. Steinback. 2004. Participatory socioeconomic analysis: Drawing on fishermen’s knowledge for marine protected area planning in California. Marine Policy 28: 335–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvano, R.A.M., and A. Begossi. 2012. Fishermen’s local ecological knowledge on Southeastern Brazilian coastal fishes: Contributions to research, conservation, and management. Neotropical Ichthyology 10: 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuya, F.C., M.L. Soboil, and J. Kido. 2000. An assessment of the effectiveness of marine protected areas in the San Juan Islands, Washington, USA. Journal of Marine Sciences 57: 1218–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worm, B., E.B. Barbier, N. Beaumont, J.E. Duffy, C. Folke, B.S. Halpern, J.B. Jackson, H.K. Lotze, et al. 2006. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314: 787–790.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Worm, B., R. Hilborn, J. K. Baum, T.A. Branch, J.S. Collie, C. Costello, M.J. Fogarty, E.A. Fulton, et al. 2009. Rebuilding global fisheries. Science 325: 578–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all the fishers and their families for supporting this study, allowing us to work in their communities, especially Sinésio, a fishmonger who let us use his space and provided valuable information. Special thanks to Robson Posidônio, a fisher from Trindade who sampled fish landings in his community and made our lives much easier by introducing us to fishers from his and other communities. Thanks to IDRC (Canada) and FAPESP (Brazil) for supporting this project (Grants Nos. 104519–004 and 2009/11154-3, respectively), to CNPq for research grants to R.A.M.S. (304377/2010-4) and to A.B., and to the FAPESP for research grant to R.A.M.S (2012/16722-2). P.F.M. Lopes thanks IDRC for an individual research grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Priscila F. M. Lopes.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 103 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lopes, P.F.M., Silvano, R.A.M., Nora, V.A. et al. Transboundary Socio-Ecological Effects of a Marine Protected Area in the Southwest Atlantic. AMBIO 42, 963–974 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0452-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0452-0

Keywords

Navigation