Skip to main content
Log in

The role of ultrasonography in the assessment of peri-prosthetic hip complications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ultrasound Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a widespread option for treating hip osteoarthritis. Peri-prosthetic complications after THA represent a common event influencing patient outcome and costs. The purpose of this paper is to report the use of ultrasonography (US) to detect peri-prosthetic complications in symptomatic patients who underwent THA.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with THA who underwent imaging evaluation between January 2009 and December 2012 at two different institutions. We evaluated the presence/absence of superficial and/or deep peri-prosthetic collections as well as the presence/absence of a cutaneous sinus tract. For patients who underwent both MRI and US, a concordance correlation analysis between US and MR findings was performed.

Results

In the reference period, 532 symptomatic patients (mean age ± standard deviation 74 ± 12 years) underwent X-ray and MRI examinations for suspected peri-prosthetic complications. Among them, 111 (20.9 %) underwent also US. Overall, 108 patients underwent both US and MRI. US findings included 67 superficial collections, 48 subcutaneous fistulas, 74 deep peri-prosthetic collections. Twenty-four patients had solid, mass-like peri-prosthetic collections. In 11 patients, no peri-prosthetic complications were seen. MRI findings included 68 superficial collections, 49 subcutaneous fistulas, 79 deep peri-prosthetic collections. Twenty-four patients had solid, mass-like peri-prosthetic collections. In four patients, no peri-prosthetic complications were seen. Concordance analysis between US and MRI findings showed almost perfect agreement (k ≥ 0.89).

Conclusion

US is an efficient and practical imaging modality to evaluate peri-prosthetic complications in patients with THA, being almost comparable to MRI in detecting and characterizing these complications.

Riassunto

Obiettivo

L’artroprotesi totale di anca (PTA) rappresenta una valida opzione per il trattamento della patologia osteoartrosica. L’incidenza di complicanze post-intervento è una problematica che influenza costi e risultato terapeutico. Scopo del lavoro è stato riportare la nostra esperienza nella valutazione ecografica di complicanze peri-protesiche in pazienti sottoposti a PTA.

Metodi

Abbiamo riesaminato retrospettivamente i referti di pazienti con sospetto di complicanze peri-protesiche che hanno eseguito follow up diagnostico presso due ospedali da Gennaio 2009 e Dicembre 2012. Abbiamo valutato la presenza/assenza di raccolte superficiali e/o profonde e la presenza di eventuali fistole cutanee. Per ogni paziente che ha eseguito risonanza magnetica (RM) ed ecografia abbiamo stimato la concordanza dei dati.

Risultati

In tale periodo, 532 pazienti (età media ± deviazione standard 74 ± 12 anni) hanno eseguito follow-up radiologico e RM presso gli istituti di riferimento. Centoundici pazienti (20.9 %) hanno anche effettuato ecografia. I pazienti che hanno eseguito ecografia e RM sono stati 108. I reperti ecografici includevano: 67 raccolte superficiali e 74 profonde, 48 fistole sottocutanee. Ventiquattro pazienti mostravano raccolte solide. Undici pazienti non mostravano complicanze. I reperti di risonanza magnetica includevano: 68 raccolte superficiali e 79 profonde, 49 fistole cutanee. Ventiquattro pazienti mostravano raccolte solide. Quattro pazienti non mostravano complicanze. L’analisi statistica dei dati ha dimostrato un’alta concordanza tra reperti ecografici e RM (k ≥ 0.89).

Conclusioni

l’ecografia è una modalità di imaging pratica ed efficace nel valutare pazienti sottoposti ad artoprotesi d’anca con sospetto di complicanze peri-protesiche, con alta correlazione con l’esame RM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Joint Registry for England and Wales (2014) 8th annual report 2011—National Joint Registry. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/NjrCentre/Portals/0/Documents/NJR%208th%20Annual%20Report%202011.pdf. Accessed 2 April 2014

  2. Tormenta S, Sconfienza LM, Iannessi F, Bizzi E, Massafra U, Orlandi D, Migliore A (2012) Prevalence study of iliopsoas bursitis in a cohort of 860 patients affected by symptomatic hip osteoarthritis. Ultrasound Med Biol 38:1352–1356. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.04.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Anagnostakos K, Schmid NV, Kelm J, Grün U, Jung J (2009) Classification of hip joint infections. Int J Med Sci 6:227–233

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gibbon WW, Long G, Barron DA, O’Connor PJ (2002) Complications of orthopedic implants: sonographic evaluation. JCU 30:288–299. doi:10.1002/jcu.10065

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Holsbeeck MT, Eyler WR, Sherman LS, Lombardi TJ, Mezger E, Verner JJ, Schurman JR, Jonsson K (1994) Detection of infection in loosened hip prostheses: efficacy of sonography. AJR 163:381–384. doi:10.2214/ajr.163.2.8037036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carbó S, Rosón N, Vizcaya S, Escribano F, Zarcero M, Medrano S (2006) Can ultrasound help to define orthopedic surgical complications? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 35:75–89. doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2006.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sconfienza LM, Perrone N, Lacelli F, Lentino C, Serafini G (2008) Ultrasound-guided injection of botulinum toxin A in the treatment of iliopsoas spasticity. J Ultrasound 11:113–117. doi:10.1016/j.jus.2008.05.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Robotti G, Canepa MG, Bortolotto C, Draghi F (2013) Interventional musculoskeletal US: an update on materials and methods. J Ultrasound 16:45–55. doi:10.1007/s40477-013-0018-9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005–2030. J Bone Jt Surg 89:780–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Antti-Poika I, Joseffsson G, Konttinen Y, Lidgren L, Santavirta S, Sanzén L (1990) Hip arthroplasty infection: current concepts. Acta Orthop Scand 61:163–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pandey R, Drakoulakis E, Athanasou NA (1999) An assessment of the histologic criteria used to diagnose infection in hip revision arthroplasty tissues. J Clin Pathol 52:118–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jutte PI, Lazzeri E, Sconfienza LM, Cassar-Pullicino V, Trampuz A, Petrosillo N, Signore A (2014) Diagnostic flowcharts in osteomyelitis, spondylodiscitis and prosthetic joint infection. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 58:2–19

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aliprandi A, Di Pietto F, Minafra P, Zappia M, Pozza S, Sconfienza LM (2014) Femoro-acetabular impingement: what the general radiologist should know. Radiol Med 119:103–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aliprandi A, Sconfienza LM, Randelli P, Bandirali M, Tritella S, Di Leo G, Sardanelli F (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Eur J Radiol 80:416–421

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aliprandi A, Sconfienza LM, Randelli F, Bandirali M, Di Leo G, Sardanelli F (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging of painful total hip replacement: detection and characterisation of periprosthetic fluid collection and interobserver reproducibility. Radiol Med 117:85–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Klauser AS, Tagliafico A, Allen GM, Boutry N, Campbell R, Court-Payen M, Grainger A, Guerini H, McNally E, O’Connor PJ, Ostlere S, Petroons P, Reijnierse M, Sconfienza LM, Silvestri E, Wilson DJ, Martinoli C (2012) Clinical indications for musculoskeletal ultrasound: a Delphi-based consensus paper of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology. Eur Radiol 22:1140–1148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Petchprapa CN, Rosenberg ZS, Sconfienza LM, Cavalcanti CF, Vieira RL, Zember JS (2010) MR imaging of entrapment neuropathies of the lower extremity. Part 1. The pelvis and hip. Radiographics 30:983–1000. doi:10.1148/rg.304095135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sofka CM, Adler RS (2003) Sonographic evaluation of shoulder arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1117–1120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller TT (2006) Sonography of joint replacements. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 10:79–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Long SS, Surrey D, Nazarian LN (2012) Common sonographic findings in the painful hip after hip arthroplasty. J Ultrasound Med 31:301–312

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Douis H, Dunlop DJ, Pearson AM, O’Hara JN, James SL (2012) The role of ultrasound in the assessment of post-operative complications following hip arthroplasty. Skelet Radiol 41:1035–1046. doi:10.1007/s00256-012-1390-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Silvana Sdao, Davide Orlandi, Alberto Aliprandi, Francesca Lacelli, Luca Maria Sconfienza, Filippo Randelli, Francesco Sardanelli, Giovanni Serafini declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Patients’ informed consent was waived for the present study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Maria Sconfienza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sdao, S., Orlandi, D., Aliprandi, A. et al. The role of ultrasonography in the assessment of peri-prosthetic hip complications. J Ultrasound 18, 245–250 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-014-0107-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-014-0107-4

Keywords

Navigation