Skip to main content
Log in

Psychometric testing on two weight stigma instruments in Iran: Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire and Weight Bias Internalized Scale

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to comprehensively and thoroughly examine the psychometric properties of two commonly used weight-related self-stigma instruments on Iranian adolescents with overweight or obesity: Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire [WSSQ] and Weight Bias Internalization Scale [WBIS].

Methods

After ensuring the linguistic validity of both the WSSQ and WBIS in their Persian versions, 737 Iranian adolescents with overweight or obesity (male = 354; mean age = 15.8 ± 1.3 years; body mass index = 30.0 ± 4.8 kg/m2) completed both questionnaires and other relevant measures regarding their depression, anxiety, stress, dietary self-efficacy, weight efficacy lifestyle, quality of life, body fat, self-esteem, body shape preoccupation, and sleepiness.

Results

In the scale level, the confirmatory factory analysis verified the two-factor structure for the WSSQ and the single-factor structure for the WBIS. The factorial structures were further found to be invariant across gender (male vs. female) and across weight status (overweight vs. obesity). Additionally, both the WSSQ and WBIS had promising properties in internal consistency, test–retest reliability, separation reliability, and separation index. In the item level, all items but WBIS item 1 (infit mean square = 1.68; outfit mean square = 1.60) had satisfactory properties in factor loadings, corrected item-total correlation, test–retest reliability, and infit and outfit mean square. Moreover, all the items did not display substantial differential item functioning (DIF) across gender and across weight status.

Conclusion

Both the WSSQ and WBIS were valid instruments to assess the internalization of weight bias for Iranian adolescents with overweight or obesity.

Level of evidence

Level V, cross-sectional descriptive study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harriger JA, Thompson JK (2012) Psychological consequences of obesity: weight bias and body image in overweight and obese youth. Int Rev Psychiatry 24(3):247–253. https://doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2012.678817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee CT, Lin CY, Strong C, Lin YF, Chou YY, Tsai MC (2018) Metabolic correlates of health-related quality of life among overweight and obese adolescents. BMC Pediatr 18(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1044-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ratcliffe D, Ellison N (2015) Obesity and internalized weight stigma: a formulation model for an emerging psychological problem. Behav Cogn Psychother 43(2):239–252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465813000763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng MY, Wang SM, Lam YY, Luk HT, Man YC, Lin CY (2018) The relationships between weight bias, perceived weight stigma, eating behavior and psychological distress among undergraduate students in Hong Kong. J Nerv Ment Dis 206(9):705–710. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong PC, Hsieh YP, Ng HH, Kong SF, Chan KL, Au TYA, Lin CY, Fung XCC (2018) Investigating the self-stigma and quality of life for overweight/obese children in Hong Kong: a preliminary study. Child Ind Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-018-9573-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hilbert A, Braehler E, Haeuser W, Zenger M (2014) Weight bias internalization, core self-evaluation, and health in overweight and obese persons. Obesity 22(1):79–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng OY, Yam CLY, Cheung NS, Lee PLP, Ngai MC, Lin CY (2019) Extended Theory of Planned Behavior on eating and physical activity. Am J Health Behav 43(3):569–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin CY (2019) Ethical issues of monitoring children’s weight status in school settings. Soc Health Behav 2(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/SHB.SHB_45_18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin YC, Latner JD, Fung XCC, Lin CY (2018) Poor health and experiences of being bullied in adolescents: self-perceived overweight and frustration with appearance matter. Obesity 26(2):397–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pakpour AH, Lin CY, Alimoradi Z (2018) Social health and behavior needs more opportunity to be discussed. Soc Health Behav 1(1):1. https://doi.org/10.4103/SHB.SHB_20_18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rashidvash V (2013) Iranian people: Iranian Ethnic Groups. Int J Hum Soc Sci 3(15):216–226

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mottaghi A, Mirmiran P, Pourvali K, Tahmasbpour Z, Azizi F (2017) Incidence and prevalence of childhood obesity in Tehran, Iran in 2011. Iran J Public Health 46(10):1395–1403

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lillis J, Luoma JB, Levin ME, Hayes SC (2010) Measuring weight self-stigma: the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire. Obesity 18(5):971–976. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2009.353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Durso LE, Latner JD (2008) Understanding self-directed stigma: development of the Weight Bias Internalization Scale. Obesity 16(Suppl. 2):S80–S86. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2008.448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maïano C, Aimé A, Lepage G, Team ASPQ, Morin AJS (2017) Psychometric properties of the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ) among a sample of overweight/obese French-speaking adolescents. Eat Weight Disord. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-017-0382-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hain B, Langer L, Hünnemeyer K, Rudofsky G, Zech U, Wild B (2015) Translation and validation of the German version of the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ). Obes Surg 25(4):750–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1598-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hübner C, Schmidt R, Selle J, Köhler H, Müller A, de Zwaan M, Hilbert A (2016) Comparing self-report measures of internalized weight stigma: the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire versus the Weight Bias Internalization Scale. PLoS One 11(10):e0165566. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165566

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Palmeira L, Cunha M, Pinto-Gouveia J (2018) The weight of weight self-stigma in unhealthy eating behaviours: the mediator role of weight-related experiential avoidance. Eat Weight Disord 23(6):785–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-018-0540-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sevincer GM, Kaya A, Bozkurt S, Akin E, Kose S (2017) Reliability, validity, and factorial structure of the Turkish version of the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (Turkish WSSQ). Psychiat Clin Psych 27(4):386–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750573.2017.1379717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee MS, Dedrick RF (2016) Weight Bias Internalization Scale: psychometric properties using alternative weight status classification approaches. Body Image 17:25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.01.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Roberto CA, Sysko R, Bush J, Pearl R, Puhl RM, Schvey NA, Dovidio JF (2012) Clinical correlates of the Weight Bias Internalization Scale in a sample of obese adolescents seeking bariatric surgery. Obesity 20(3):533–539. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2011.123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hilbert A, Baldofski S, Zenger M, Löwe B, Kersting A, Braehler E (2014) Weight Bias Internalization Scale: psychometric properties and population norms. PLoS One 9(1):e86303. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zuba A, Warschburger P (2018) Weight bias internalization across weight categories among school-aged children. Validation of the Weight Bias Internalization Scale for Children. Body Image 25:56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.02.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Apay SE, Yilmaz E, Aksoy M, Akalın H (2017) Validity and reliability study of Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale in Turkish. Int J Caring Sci 10(3):1341–1347

    Google Scholar 

  25. Erdogan Z, Kurcer MK, Kurtuncu M, Catalcam S (2018) Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the weight Self-stigma questionnaire. J Pak Med Assoc 68(12):1798–1803

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Innamorati M, Imperatori C, Lamis DA, Contardi A, Castelnuovo G, Tamburello S, Manzoni GM, Fabbricatore M (2017) Weight bias internalization scale discriminates obese and overweight patients with different severity levels of depression: the Italian Version of the WBIS. Curr Psychol 36(2):242–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9406-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pakpour AH, Tsai M-C, Lin Y-C, Strong C, Latner JD, Fung XCC, Lin C-Y, Tsang HWH (2019) Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire and Weight Bias Internalization Scale in Hongkongese children and adolescents. Int J Clin Health Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2019.03.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Boone WJ (2016) Rasch analysis for instrument development: why, when, and hHow? CBE Life Sci Educ 15(4):rm4. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-04-0148

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Chang CC, Su JA, Tsai CS, Yen CF, Liu JH, Lin CY (2015) Rasch analysis suggested three unidimensional domains for Affiliate Stigma Scale: additional psychometric evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol 68(6):674–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.01.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tractenberg RE (2010) Classical and modern measurement theories, patient reports, and clinical outcomes. Contemp Clin Trials 31(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1551-7144(09)00212-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheung GW, Rensvold RB (2002) Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Eq Mod 9(2):233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chang CC, Su JA, Chang KC, Lin CY, Koschorke M, Thornicroft G (2018) Perceived stigma of caregivers: psychometric evaluation for Devaluation of Consumer Families Scale. Int J Clin Health Psychol 18(2):170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.12.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Lin CY, Strong C, Latner JD, Lin YC, Tsai MC, Cheung P (2019) Mediated effects of eating disturbances in the association of perceived weight stigma and emotional distress. Eat Weight Disord. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-019-00641-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pearl RL, Hopkins CH, Berkowitz RI, Wadden TA (2018) Group cognitive-behavioral treatment for internalized weight stigma: a pilot study. Eat Weight Disord 23(3):357–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-016-0336-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. The Statistical Report of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2017) The Iranian Authority for General Department of Public Statistics and Statistical Center of Iran. https://www.amar.org.ir/. Accessed 26 Mar 2018

  36. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (2018) About Child & Teen BMI. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/childrens_bmi/about_childrens_bmi.html. Accessed 26 Mar 2018

  37. Bahreynian M, Qorbani M, Khaniabadi BM, Motlagh ME, Safari O, Asayesh H, Kelishadi R (2017) Association between Obesity and Parental Weight Status in Children and Adolescents. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 9(2):111–117. https://doi.org/10.4274/jcrpe.3790

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Pakpour AH, Zeidi IM, Yekaninejad MS, Burri A (2014) Validation of a translated and culturally adapted Iranian version of the International Index of Erectile Function. J Sex Marital Ther 40(6):541–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2013.788110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang Y, Chen HJ (2012) Use of percentiles and z -scores in anthropometry. In: Preedy VR (ed) Handbook of anthropometry: physical measures of human form in health and disease. Springer, London, pp 29–48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH (1995) The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther 33(3):335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Asghari A, Saed F, Dibajnia P (2008) Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) in a non-clinical Iranian sample. Int J Psychol 2(2):82–102

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lin CY, Broström A, Nilsen P, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH (2017) Psychometric validation of the Persian Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale using classic test theory and Rasch models. J Behav Addict 6(4):620–629. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.071

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Szabó M (2010) The short version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): factor structure in a young adolescent sample. J Adolesc 33(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.05.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Parcel GS, Edmundson E, Perry CL, Feldman HA, O’Hara-Tompkins N, Nader PR, Johnson CC, Stone EJ (1995) Measurement of self-efficacy for diet-related behaviors among elementary school children. J Sch Health 65(1):23–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pakpour AH, Gellert P, Dombrowski SU, Fridlund B (2015) Motivational interviewing with parents for obesity: an RCT. Pediatrics 135(3):e644–e652. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Clark MM, King TK (2000) Eating self-efficacy and weight cycling: a prospective clinical study. Eat Behav 1(1):47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1471-0153(00)00009-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mirkarimi K, Kabir MJ, Honarvar MR, Ozouni-Davaji RB, Eri M (2017) Effect of motivational interviewing on weight efficacy lifestyle among women with overweight and obesity: a randomized controlled trial. Iran J Med Sci 42(2):187–193

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Walpole B, Dettmer E, Morrongiello BA, McCrindle BW, Hamilton J (2013) Motivational interviewing to enhance self-efficacy and promote weight loss in overweight and obese adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Psychol 38(9):944–953. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lin CY (2018) Comparing quality of life instruments: Sizing Them Up versus PedsQL and Kid-KINDL. Soc Health Behav 1:42–47. https://doi.org/10.4103/SHB.SHB_25_18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS (2001) PedsQL™ 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ Version 4.0 Generic Core Scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care 39(8):800–812

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Pakpour AH (2013) Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ Short Form 15 Generic Core Scales. Singap Med J 54(6):309–314. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2013123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Shapurian R, Hojat M, Nayerahmadi H (1987) Psychometric characteristics and dimensionality of a Persian version of Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale. Percept Mot Skills 65(1):27–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Pakpour AH, Chen CY, Lin CY, Strong C, Tsai MC, Lin YC (2018) The relationship between children’s overweight and quality of life: a comparison of sizing me up, PedsQL and Kid-KINDL. Int J Clin Health Psychol 19(1):49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2018.06.002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Welch E, Lagerström M, Ghaderi A (2012) Body Shape Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the short version (BSQ-8C) and norms from the general Swedish population. Body Image 9(4):547–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.04.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Veisy F, Ahmadi SM, Sadeghi K, Rezaee M (2018) The psychometric properties of Body Shape Questionnaire C8 in women with eating disorders. Iran J Psychiatry Clin Psychol 23(4):480–493. https://doi.org/10.29252/nirp.ijpcp.23.4.480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Akdemir A, Inandi T, Akbas D, Karaoglan Kahilogullari A, Eren M, Canpolat BI (2012) Validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the body shape questionnaire among female high school students: preliminary examination. Eur Eat Disord Rev 20(1):e114–e115. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Johns MW (2015) The assessment of sleepiness in children and adolescents. Sleep Biol Rhythm 13(Suppl 1):97

    Google Scholar 

  58. Imani V, Lin CY, Jalilolghadr S, Pakpour AH (2018) Factor structure and psychometric properties of a Persian translation of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale for Children and Adolescents. Health Promot Perspect 8(3):200–207. https://doi.org/10.15171/hpp.2018.27

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Maskey R, Fei J, Nguyen HO (2018) Use of exploratory factor analysis in maritime research. Asian J Shipp Logist 34(2):91–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2018.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci 16:74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Linacre JM (2002) What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean? https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt162f.htm. Accessed 26 Mar 2018

  62. Shih CL, Wang WC (2009) Differential item functioning detection using the multiple indicators, multiple causes method with a pure short anchor. Appl Psychol Meas 33(3):184–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621608321758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Enders C, Bandalos D (2001) The relative performance of Full Information Maximum Likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Struct Eq Mod 8(3):430–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Lin KP, Lee ML (2017) Validating a Chinese version of the weight self-stigma questionnaire for use with obese adults. Int J Nurs Pract 23(4):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Lin CY, Strong C, Tsai MC, Lee CT (2017) Raters interpret positively and negatively worded items similarly in a quality of life instrument for children: Kid-KINDL. Inquiry 54:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958017696724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Essayli JH, Murakami JM, Wilson RE, Latner JD (2017) The impact of weight labels on body Image, internalized weight stigma, affect, perceived health, and intended weight loss behaviors in normal-weight and overweight college women. Am J Health Promot 31(6):484–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117116661982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Chan KL, Lee CSC, Cheng CM, Hui LY, So WT, Yu TS, Lin CY (2019) Investigating the relationship between weight-related self-stigma and mental health for overweight/obese children in Hong Kong. J Nerv Ment Dis. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000001021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Souza AC, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB (2017) Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiol Serv Saude 26(3):649–659. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir H. Pakpour.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, CY., Imani, V., Cheung, P. et al. Psychometric testing on two weight stigma instruments in Iran: Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire and Weight Bias Internalized Scale. Eat Weight Disord 25, 889–901 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-019-00699-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-019-00699-4

Keywords

Navigation