Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Between-day test–retest reliability of gait variability in older individuals improves with a familiarization trial

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gait variability is an important measure in clinical settings to diagnose older individuals with fall risk. This study examines whether a familiarization trial improves test–retest reliability of gait variability. Twenty-two older participants walked twice at 1 day and twice 7 days later. The standard deviations of stride length, swing time, stance time, stride time and minimum foot clearance were calculated. The test–retest reliability of (1) between-day comparison of the first trials and (2) between-day comparison of the second trials of all gait variability measures was quantified with the intraclass-correlation coefficient (ICC), the smallest detectable differences (SDD) and the bias and the limits of agreement (LoA). The between-day comparison of the second trials per day showed higher ICC values, lower LoA values and lower SDD values in all analyzed parameters. Our data suggest that the reliability of gait variability in an older population can be considerably improved just with the aid of one familiarization trial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hamacher D, Singh NB, Van Dieën JH et al (2011) Kinematic measures for assessing gait stability in elderly individuals: a systematic review. J R Soc Interface 8:1682–1698. doi:10.1098/rsif.2011.0416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamacher D, Hamacher D, Schega L (2014) A cognitive dual task affects gait variability in patients suffering from chronic low back pain. Exp Brain Res 232:3509–3513. doi:10.1007/s00221-014-4039-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamacher D, Hamacher D, Rehfeld K et al (2015) The effect of a six months dancing program on motor-cognitive dual task performance in older adults. J Aging Phys Act. doi:10.1123/japa.2014-0067

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lord S, Howe T, Greenland J et al (2011) Gait variability in older adults: a structured review of testing protocol and clinimetric properties. Gait Posture 34:443–450. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.07.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. König N, Singh NB, von Beckerath J et al (2014) Is gait variability reliable? An assessment of spatio-temporal parameters of gait variability during continuous overground walking. Gait Posture 39:615–617. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.06.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamacher D, Hamacher D, Taylor WR et al (2014) Towards clinical application: repetitive sensor position re-calibration for improved reliability of gait parameters. Gait Posture 39:1146–1148. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.01.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Urquhart DM, Morris ME, Iansek R (1999) Gait consistency over a 7-day interval in people with Parkinson’s disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80:696–701. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90175-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6:284–290. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hartmann A, Murer K, de Bie RA et al (2009) Reproducibility of spatio-temporal gait parameters under different conditions in older adults using a trunk tri-axial accelerometer system. Gait Posture 30:351–355. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.06.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamacher D, Herold F, Wiegel P et al (2015) Brain activity during walking: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.08.002

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hars M, Herrmann FR, Trombetti A (2013) Reliability and minimal detectable change of gait variables in community-dwelling and hospitalized older fallers. Gait Posture 38:1010–1014. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.05.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sport Science, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Zschokkestr. 32, 39104, Magdeburg, Germany

    Dennis Hamacher, Martin Krowicki & Lutz Schega

  2. Department of Exercise Physiology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Seidelstr. 20, 07749, Jena, Germany

    Daniel Hamacher

Authors
  1. Dennis Hamacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Hamacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martin Krowicki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lutz Schega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis Hamacher.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the local ethics committee of the Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamacher, D., Hamacher, D., Krowicki, M. et al. Between-day test–retest reliability of gait variability in older individuals improves with a familiarization trial. Aging Clin Exp Res 29, 327–329 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0536-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0536-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation