Abstract
Background
Hip fracture is the most clinically devastating and economically important complication of osteoporosis. Pain, suffering, loss of mobility and independence are some of the devastating consequences of hip fractures. The present study aimed to determine the main characteristics and outcomes of patients with osteoporotic hip fracture and treatment gaps at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Methods
This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study analyzing charts of patients > 45 years who were admitted for hip fracture secondary to low-grade trauma from 2008 to 2012.
Results
A total of 264 patients (50.4% males and 49.6% females) were included. The most common fracture types were trochanter (49%) and femoral neck (46%). History of falls was documented in 115 (43.6%) patients. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed in only 41 (15.5%) patients. Majority underwent surgery (92%). Surgical complications occurred in 15 (5.7%) patients and medical complications in 21 (7.9%) patients. Vitamin D and calcium were the most common medications, but given only to 45 (17%) patients. Bone mineral density (BMD) assessment was significantly more frequent post-surgery than pre-surgery (p = 0.03). Very few patients received osteoporosis-specific therapy. F ollow-up revealed that 62 (23.5%) patients died 1 year after surgery.
Conclusion
These present findings warrant urgent reassessment of clinical care and treatments provided to patients with osteoporotic hip fractures to prevent recurrent fractures. The introduction of Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) in institutions caring for patients with hip fractures as internationally recommended will definitely change the current status of care.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) (1999) Hip fracture in seniors: A call for health system reform. Position Statement 1144. Rosemont, IL
Ardawi M, Maimany A, Bahksh T et al (2005) Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in healthy Saudis. Osteoporosis Int 16:43–55
Gillespie W (2001) Extracts from “clinical evidence”: hip fracture. BMJ 322:986–1075
Sambrook P, Cooper C (2006) Osteoporosis. Lancet 367:2010–2018
Juby A, Geus-Wenceslau C (2002) Evaluation of osteoporosis treatment in seniors after hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 13:205–210
Kanis JA, Cooper C, Rizzoli R et al (2019) Executive summary of European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Aging Clin Exp Res 31:15–17
Kanis JA, Cooper C, Rizzoli R et al (2019) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 1:3–44
Compston J, Cooper A, Cooper C, National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) et al (2009) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men from the age of 50 years in the UK. Maturitas 62:105–8
Rabenda V, Vanoverloop J, Fabri V et al (2008) Low incidence of anti-osteoporosis treatment after hip fracture. Bone Jt Surg Am 90:2142–2148
Jennings L, Auerbach A, Maselli J et al (2010) Missed opportunities for osteoporosis treatment in patients hospitalized for hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 58:650–657
Bubshait D, Sadat-Ali M (2007) Economic implications of osteoporosis-related femoral fractures in Saudi Arabian society. Calcif Tissue Int 81:455–458
Wei J, Zeng L, Li S et al (2019) Relationship between comorbidities and treatment decision-making in elderly hip fracture patients. Aging Clin Exp Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01134-5
Abtahi S, Driessen JHM, Vestergaard P et al (2019) Secular trends in major osteoporotic fractures among 50+ adults in Denmark between 1995 and 2010. Osteoporos Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-019-05109-0
Sadat-Ali M, Alfaraidy M, AlHawas A et al (2017) Morbidity and mortality after fragility hip fracture in a Saudi Arabian population: report from a single center. J Int Med Res 45:1175–1180
Cauley J (2006) Osteoporosis in men: prevalence and investigation. Clin Cornerstone 8:S20–S25
Saeedi M, Al-Amri F, Mohamed A, Ibrahim A (2014) Knowledge, attitude and practice towards osteoporosis among primary health care physicians in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Sci J Public Health 2:624–630
Nutz A, Bastide S, Flaisler F et al (2018) AB0986 Management of osteoporosis after major fracture in a cohort of women aged over 50 in a real life setting. Ann Rheum Dis 77:1615
Liu R, Chao A, Wang K et al (2018) Incidence and risk factors of medical complications and direct medical costs after osteoporotic fracture among patients in China. Arch Osteoporos 13:12
Gonnelli S, Caffarelli C, Iolascon G et al (2017) Prescription of anti-osteoporosis medications after hospitalization for hip fracture: a multi-centre Italian survey. Aging Clin Exp Res 29:1031–1037
Wang P, Li Y, Zhuang H et al (2018) Influence of bone densitometry on the anti-osteoporosis treatment after fragility hip fracture. Aging Clin Exp Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-018-1094-7
Al-Saleh Y, Sulimani R, Sabico S et al (2015) 2015 Guidelines for osteoporosis in Saudi Arabia: recommendations from the Saudi Osteoporosis Society. Ann Saudi Med 35:1–12
Nurmi-Luthje I, Luthje P, Kaukonen J (2009) Post-fracture prescribed calcium and vitamin D supplements alone or, in females, with concomitant anti-osteoporotic drugs is associated with lower mortality in elderly hip fracture patients: a prospective analysis. Drug Aging 26:409–421
Alsuwadia AO, Farag YM, Al Sayyari AA et al (2013) Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in Saudi adults. Saudi Med J 34:814–818
Sadat-Ali M, Al Elq AH, Al-Turki HA et al (2011) Influence of vitamin D levels on bone mineral density and osteoporosis. Ann Saudi Med 31:602–608
Frisch N, Wessell N, Charters M et al (2018) Hip fracture mortality: differences between intertrochanteric and femoral neck fractures. J Surg Orthop Adv 27:64–71
Boylan M, Riesgo A, Paulino C et al (2018) Mortality following periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures versus native hip fractures. J Bone Jt Surg Am 100:578–585
Riska B, Forsén L, Omsland T et al (2018) Does the association of comorbidity with 1-Year mortality after hip fracture differ according to gender? The Norwegian Epidemiologic Osteoporosis Studies (NOREPOS). J Am Geriatr Soc 66:553–558
Yee D, Fang C, Lau T et al (2017) Seasonal variation in hip fracture mortality. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 8:49–53
Kiadaliri A, Rosengren B, Englund M (2018) Fracture-related mortality in Southern Sweden: a multiple cause of death analysis, 1998–2014. Injury 49:236–242
Haleem S, Lutchman L, Mayahi R et al (2008) Mortality following hip fracture: trends and geographical variations over the last 40 years. Injury 39:1157–1163
Jantzen C, Madsen C, Lauritzen J et al (2018) Temporal trends in hip fracture incidence, mortality, and morbidity in Denmark from 1999 to 2012. Acta Orthop 89:170–176
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful for the Researchers Supporting Group (RSP-2019/21) in King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia for their assistance.
Funding
The study received no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (IRB Ref # SP14/055).
Statement of human and animal rights
The authors confirm that procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation.
Informed consent
Not applicable in the present study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Al Saleh, Y., El Seid, M.E., Ruhaiyem, M.E. et al. Characteristics and outcomes of osteoporotic hip fractures: treatment gaps in a tertiary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Aging Clin Exp Res 32, 1689–1695 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01377-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01377-2