Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Empirical Functions for Conversion of Femur Areal and Volumetric Bone Mineral Density

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is areal and in the unit of g/cm2, while BMD measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is volumetric and in the unit of g/cm3. There is often a need to convert them to each other, but a simple conversion method is not available. The objective of this study was to establish empirical functions for the conversion. QCT of left femur from 67 subjects were acquired from a local clinical centre. For each subject, volumetric BMD was extracted from QCT using QCT Pro; the corresponding areal BMD was measured by CTXA-Hip. Both QCT Pro and CTXA-Hip are commercial software. The paired volumetric and areal BMD datasets were randomly split into two groups, and used respectively in construction and validation of empirical functions. Correlation between volumetric and areal BMD was 0.9073 (p < 0.0001) without considering femoral neck width (FNW), and 0.9970 (p < 0.0001) with the consideration of FNW. In the validations, the best agreement between predicted and measured volumetric BMD was R2 = 0.9796, SSE = 0.0074, CV = 2.7%; the best agreement between predicted and measured areal BMD was R2 = 0.9713, SSE = 0.0072, CV = 2.8%. Femur size represented by FNW had substantial effect on correlation between areal and volumetric BMD. With the consideration of FNW, areal and volumetric BMD can be converted to each other using the empirical functions constructed in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bauer, J. S., & Link, T. M. (2009). Advances in osteoporosis imaging. European Journal of Radiology, 71, 440–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blake, G. M., & Fogelman, I. (2007). The role of DXA bone density scans in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 83, 509–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Engelke, K., Lang, T., Khosla, S., Qin, L., Zysset, P., Leslie, W. D., et al. (2015). Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the hip in the management of osteoporosis in adults: The 2015 iscd official positions-part I. Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 18, 338–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Linet, M. S., Slovis, T. L., Miller, D. L., Kleinerman, R., Lee, C., Rajaraman, P., et al. (2012). Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 62, 75–100.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shuryak, I., Sachs, R. K., & Brenner, D. J. (2010). Cancer risks after radiation exposure in middle age. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 102, 1628–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Martin, R. B., & Burr, D. B. (1984). Non-invasive measurement of long bone cross-sectional moment of inertia by photon absorptiometry. Journal of Biomechanics, 17, 195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Beck, T. J., Ruff, C. B., Warden, K. E., & Jr, W. W. (1990). Scott, and G.U. Rao. Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data: A structural approach. Investigative Radiology, 25, 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoshikawa, T., Turner, C. H., Peacock, M., Slemenda, C. W., Weaver, C. M., Teegarden, D., et al. (1994). Geometric structure of the femoral neck measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 9, 1053–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Luo, Y., Ferdous, Z., & Leslie, W. D. (2013). Precision study of DXA-based patient-specific finite element modeling for assessing hip fracture risk. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 29, 615–629.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang, L., Peel, N., Clowes, J. A., McCloskey, E. V., & Eastell, R. (2009). Use of DXA-based structural engineering models of the proximal femur to discriminate hip fracture. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 24, 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Luo, Y., Ferdous, Z., & Leslie, W. D. (2011). A preliminary dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based finite element model for assessing osteoporotic hipfracture risk. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 225, 1188–1195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Naylor, K. E., McCloskey, E. V., Eastell, R., & Yang, L. (2013). Use of DXA-based finite element analysis of the proximal femur in a longitudinal study of hip fracture. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 28, 1014–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Helgason, B., Perilli, E., et al. (2008). Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: A literature review. Clinical Biomechanics, 23, 135–146.

  14. Lotz, J. C., Gerhart, T. N., & Hayes, W. C. (1990). Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur: A quantitative CT study. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 14, 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Keller, T. S. (1994). Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. Journal of Biomechanics, 27, 1159–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Morgan, E. F., Bayraktar, H. H., & Keaveny, T. M. (2003). Trabecular bone modulus–density relationships depend on anatomic site. Journal of Biomechanics, 36, 897–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Den Buijs, J. O., & Dragomir-Daescu, D. (2010). Validated finite element models of the proximal femur using two-dimensional projected geometry and bone density. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 104, 168–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Targownik, L., Luo, Y., Goertzen, A., Slotboom, A., Leslie, W. D. (2015). Comparing bone structure and bone metabolism between long-term proton pump inhibitor users and non-users. Gastroenterology, 148, S–153.

  19. Pickhardt, P. J., Bodeen, G., Brown, J. K., & Binkley, N. (2015). Comparison of femoral Neck BMD evaluation obtained using lunar DXA and QCT with asynchronous calibration from ct colonography. Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 18, 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheng, X., Wang, L., Wang, Q., Ma, Y., Su, Y., & Li, K. (2014). Validation of quantitative computed tomography-derived areal bone mineral density with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in an elderly Chinese population. Chinese Medical Journal, 127, 1445–1449.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Khoo, B. C., Brown, K., Cann, C., et al. (2009). Comparison of QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and t scores. Osteoporosis International, 20, 1539–1545.

  22. Cann, C. E., Adams, J. E., Brown, J. K., & Brett, A. D. (2014). CTXA hip—An extension of classical DXA measurements using quantitative CT. PLoS ONE, 9(3), e91904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leslie, W. D., Kovacs, C. S., Olszynski, W. P., et al. (2011). Spine-hip T-score difference predicts major osteoporotic fracture risk independent of FRAX((R)): A population-based report from CAMOS. Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 14, 286–293.

  24. Szulc, P., Duboeuf, F., & Chapurlat, R. (2017). Age-related changes in fat mass and distribution in men-the cross-sectional STRAMBO study. J Clin Densitom, 20, 472–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The reported research has been supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) and Research Manitoba in Canada, which are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada

    Yunhua Luo

  2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada

    Yunhua Luo

Authors
  1. Yunhua Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunhua Luo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, Y. Empirical Functions for Conversion of Femur Areal and Volumetric Bone Mineral Density. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 39, 287–293 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-018-0394-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-018-0394-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation