Skip to main content
Log in

Hip fracture management in the emergency department and its impact on hospital outcomes: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
European Geriatric Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Key summary points

AbstractSection Aim

This study aims to report on the time taken to deliver crucial treatment for patients with hip fracture in the Emergency Department (ED) of a tertiary centre and identify any association between time spent in ED and hospital health outcomes.

AbstractSection Findings

Hospital hip fracture care in this ED was delivered in a timely manner. Spending ≥ 5 h in ED before transfer to the orthopaedic ward was associated with cardiac events and prolonged (≥ 14 days) hospital stay, but not mean length of stay, discharge to care home, or in-hospital death.

AbstractSection Message

Hospital hip fracture care starts upon arrival to the ED and there are points for improvement according to international guidelines on analgetic methods and the use of specified care protocols.

Abstract

Purpose

The emergency department (ED) plays an important role in initiating early treatment for hip fractures and ensuring prompt transfer to orthopaedic wards. This study reported on the care delivered in a tertiary centre ED in Malaysia and the association between time spent in ED with hospital outcomes.

Methods

Patients aged ≥ 65 years with fragility hip fractures and seen by the geriatric team were recruited. Data were collected on patient characteristics, key time points for treatment and hospital outcomes. Median time in ED was used to dichotomise long and short waiting time.

Results

447 patients were recruited. The mean (SD) age was 80.5 (7.0) years and 69.8% were women. 74.9% were prescribed analgesia within 30 min. Median (Q1,Q3) time to diagnostic imaging was 27.0 (24.0–43.0) minutes, clinician confirmation of fracture was 83.0 (49.0–129.0) minutes, and time in ED was 4.8 (3.5–6.9) h. A weekday, weekend, in-hour or out-of-hour admission did not demonstrate a difference in the time important care was delivered. Patients who spent ≥ 5 h in ED had more cardiac events (4.6 vs 10.1%, p = 0.023) and more spent ≥ 14 days in hospital (17.5 vs 29.0%, p = 0.004) compared to those < 5 h. No significant increase in inpatient complications (43.5 vs 34.6%, p = 0.054), length of stay (median, 8 vs 7 days, p = 0.119), care home discharge (5.3 vs 4.6%, p = 0.772), or in-hospital death (6.3 vs 4.2%, p = 0.313) were observed.

Conclusion

Time to early hip fracture pain relief and diagnosis was adequate in this ED. Time ≥ 5 h in ED was associated with cardiac events and 2 weeks or more inpatient stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Veronese N, Maggi S (2018) Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture. Injury 49(8):1458–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheung CL, Ang SB, Chadha M, Chow ESL, Chung YS, Hew FL et al (2018) An updated hip fracture projection in Asia: The Asian Federation of Osteoporosis Societies study. Osteoporos Sarcopenia 4(1):16–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afos.2018.03.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ong T, Khor HM, Kumar CS, Singh S, Chong EGM, Ganthel K, Lee JK (2020) The current and future challenges of hip fracture management in Malaysia. Malays Orthop J 14(3):16–21. https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2011.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Klestil T, Roder C, Stotter C, Winkler B, Nehrer S, Lutz M et al (2018) Impact of timing of surgery in elderly hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 8:13933. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32098-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Simunovic N, Devereaux PJ, Sprague S, Guyatt GH, Schemitsch E, Debeer J et al (2010) Effect of early surgery after hip fracture review on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 182(15):1609–1616. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.092220

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Falls and Fragility Fracture Audit Programme. The National Hip Fracture Database. Royal College of Physicians. Available from: https://www.nhfd.co.uk/. Accessed 19 Nov 2020

  7. National Office of Clinical Audit. Irish Hip Fracture Database. NOCA. Available from: https://www.noca.ie/audits/irish-hip-fracture-database. Accessed 19 Nov 2020

  8. Hwang U, Richardson LD, Sonuyi TO, Morrison RS (2006) The effect of emergency department crowding on the management of pain in older adults with hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 54(2):270–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00587.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zin CS, Nazar NI, Rahman NS, Alias NE, Ahmad WR, Rani NS et al (2018) (2018) Trends and patterns of analgesic prescribing in Malaysian public hospitals from 2010 to 2016: tramadol predominately used. J Pain Res 11:1959–1966. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S164774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Hip fracture: management. Clinical guideline (CG124). NICE. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg124/chapter/Recommendations#analgesia. Accessed 23 Nov 2020

  11. Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry steering group. Australian and New Zealand guideline for hip fracture care. Improving outcomes in hip fracture management of adults. 2014. ANZHFR. Available from: https://anzhfr.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/ANZ-Guideline-for-Hip-Fracture-Care.pdf. Accessed 23 Nov 2020

  12. Guay J, Parker MJ, Griffiths R, Kopp S (2017) Peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001159.pub3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Haugan K, Johnsen LG, Basso T, Foss OA (2017) Mortality and readmission following hip fracture surgery: a retrospective study comparing conventional and fast-track care. BMJ Open 7:e015574. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015574

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Pollmann CT, Rotterud JH, Gjertsen JE, Dahl FA, Lenvik O, Aroen A (2019) Fast track hip fracture care and mortality – an observational study of 2230 patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20(1):248. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2637-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ollivere B, Rollins K, Brankin R, Wood M, Brammar TJ, Wimhurst J (2012) Optimising fast track care for proximal femoral fracture patients using modified early warning score. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 94(4):267–271. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588412X13171221501744

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sheehan KJ, Goubar A, Almilaji O, Martin FC, Potter C, Jones GD et al (2021) Discharge after hip fracture surgery by mobilisation timing: secondary analysis of the UK National Hip Fracture Database. Age Ageing 50(2):415–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Paling S, Lambert J, Clouting J, Gonzalez-Esquerre J, Auterson T (2020) Waiting times in emergency departments: exploring the factors associated with longer patient waits for emergency care in England using routinely collected daily data. Emerg Med J 37:781–786

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel PB, Combs MA, Vinson DR (2014) Reduction of admit wait times: The effect of a leadership-based program. Acad Emerg Med 21(3):266–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Larsson G, Holgers KM (2011) Fast-track care for patients with suspected hip fracture. Injury 42(11):1257–1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.01.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful for the administrative support provided by the health records department and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery. This study was supported by a University of Malaya Bantuan Kecil Penyelidikan (BK022-2016) research grant.

Funding

This project was funded by the University of Malaya Bantuan Kecil Penyelidikan (BKP) research grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TO, HMK, CSKC, SS and MIZ contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by CNT, GHMP and WCL. The first draft of the manuscript was written by CNT, GHMP and TO. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terence Ong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors (CNT, HMK, GHMP, WCL, TS, CSKC, SS, MIZ, TO) declare that they have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose related to this study.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Malaya Research Ethics Committee (reference number 20163-2260).

Consent to participate

No individual participant consent was required. Ethical approval was granted to analyse routinely held hospital electronic records.

Consent for publication

We consent for this manuscript to be published by this journal upon acceptance after the peer review and editing process.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thiam, C.N., Khor, H.M., Pang, G.H.M. et al. Hip fracture management in the emergency department and its impact on hospital outcomes: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis. Eur Geriatr Med 13, 1081–1088 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-022-00654-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-022-00654-0

Keywords

Navigation