Skip to content
Publicly Available Published by De Gruyter October 1, 2017

Predictors of chronic neuropathic pain after scoliosis surgery in children

  • Florence Julien-Marsollier , Raphaelle David , Julie Hilly , Christopher Brasher , Daphné Michelet and Souhayl Dahmani EMAIL logo

Abstract

Background

Numerous publications describe chronic pain following surgery in both adults and children. However, data in the paediatric population are still sparse and both prevalence of chronic pain after surgery and risk factors of this complication still undetermined.

Methods

We prospectively evaluated the prevalence of chronic pain and its neuropathic pain component at 1 year following correction of idiopathic scoliosis in children less than 18 years of age. Pain was defined as the presence of pain (numerical rating scale – NRS ≥4), the presence of signs of neurologic damage within the area of surgery and the presence of the neuropathic symptoms as a DN4 (Douleur Neuropathique 4) questionnaire ≥4. Factors investigated as potentially associated with the presence of a persistent neuropathic pain were: age, weight, the presence of continuous preoperative pain over the 3 months before surgery, surgical characteristics, pain scores during the first five postoperative days, and DN4 at day 3. Statistical analysis employed univariate analysis and a multivariate logistic regression model.

Results

Thirty six patients were included in the study. Nineteen (52.8%) had pain at one year after surgery. Among them 17 (48.2%) had neuropathic pain. Logistic regression found continuous pain over the 3 months preceding surgery and day 1 morphine consumption ≥0.5 mg kg-1 as independent predictors of persistent chronic pain with a neuropathic component. The overall model accuracy was 80.6 and the area under the curve of the model was 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.78–0.99).

Conclusions

The present study found a high proportion of paediatric patients developing chronic persistent pain after surgical correction of scoliosis diformity. It allows identifying two factors associated with the occurrence of persistent chronic pain with a neuropathic component: the presence of persistent preoperative pain during the 3 months preceeding surgery and postoperative opioid consumption at day 1 –;0.5 mg kg-1

Implication

Patients scheduled for spine surgery and presenting with preoperative pain should be considered at risk of chronic pain after surgery and managed accordingly by the chronic and/or acute pain team. Postoperative opioid consumption should be lowered as possible by using multimodal analgesia and regional analgesia such as postoperative epidural analgesia.

1 Introduction

Postoperative pain is a concern for both clinicians and patients [1], and is one of patients’ greatest concerns in the perioperative period, both in adults and children [1].

Good postoperative pain management can be considered an indicator of perioperative management quality and is an ethical responsibility for caregivers. Recent studies have found acute postoperative pain to be a major risk factor for sensitization and/or hyperalgesia that impact upon future pain experiences, especially in children and infants [2,3]. Furthermore, acute postoperative pain is associated with chronic postoperative pain [3].

A growing body of evidence strongly suggests persistent chronic pain after surgery is a public health problem. Ten to 20% of all adult surgical patients are estimated to suffer from chronic pain [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. High risk surgeries (amputation, thoracotomy, breast cancer surgery, and craniotomy) and predictive factors (early postoperative pain, psychological factors) are being defined in adult populations [8]. Chronic pain is technically difficult and more costly to treat than acute pain, largely due to the requirement of multidisciplinary teamwork [12,13,14]. In addition, it is associated with important impairment in quality of life [10,15]. This is especially well documented in neuropathic pain, the most frequent form of chronic pain after surgery [8,16]. As a result, identifying patients at risk of chronic pain is important.

Although many risk factors have indeed been identified for chronic pain in children (extensive surgery, preoperative anxiety and persistent pain 15 days after surgery), data are still lacking for both incidence and risk factors [8,9,10,17,18]. In addition, chronic pain in children and adolescents is even more challenging to treat given limited evidence in this population [10] and carry important long-lasting psychological consequences [10,15]. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of chronic pain after surgery, and more specifically the presence of a neuropathic component, one year after scoliosis surgery in children and to identify its risk factors.

2 Material and methods

We designed the prospective collection of data in patients undergoing surgical correction of idiopathic scoliosis fromJanuary 2014 to May 2014. This study was approved by our institutional IRB (Comité d’Evaluation de l’Ethique des projets de Recherche Biomédicale (CEERB) Robert Debré; # 2013/007). Informed written consent was obtained for all patients and parents.

2.1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria were: age <18 years, single stage posterior fixation spinal surgery, idiopathic scoliosis, absence of contraindication to the use of analgesics used by protocol in our institution for scoliosis surgery: paracetamol, NSAIDs, nefopam, opioids, gabapentin. Exclusion criteria were: secondary surgical intervention for infection or other surgical complications, thoracoplasty, anterior release or fixation, sacral fusion, inability to understand French or English languages and absence of consent to participate to the study.

Inclusion was performed during the preoperative consultation (a preoperative consultation is performed systematically in the 5 week preceding the scheduled date of surgery) and consent of patients and parents were obtained at this time.

2.2 Perioperative anaesthesia

Anaesthesia was standardized and follows our protocol for the management of scoliosis surgery, the anaesthesia protocol published in a previous article [19]. Preoperative anaesthesia and surgical preparation included standardized recombinant Erythropoietin administration and iron supplementation, intraoperative antifibrinolytic agent administration (tranexamic acid) and intraoperative red blood cell salvage. In addition, all patients were given oral Gabapentin 1200 mg before surgery that was continued at a daily dose of 600 mg until day 5. Anaesthesia protocol was as follows: preoxygenation for 3 min, then induction using sevoflurane (6% in a 50% mixture of O2/N2O) or intravenous propofol (5–7 mg kg-1). Maintenance involved sevoflurane at 0.8 minimal alveolar concentration. Intraoperative analgesia was in the form of sufentanil boluses (0.2 μgkg-1 when heart rate or mean arterial pressure increased by more than 20% of preoperative values) and intrathecal morphine (0.5 μgkg-1 after incision performed under visual control by the surgeon). All patients were intubated with a non-depolarizing muscle relaxant. Muscle relaxation was systematically reversed at the end of surgery. Patients were operated upon in the prone position on a Jackson frame. A minimum of two venous cannula were inserted and Ringer’s Lactate solution (RL) administered at 2 ml kg-1 h-1. Further vascular filling was administered according to oesophageal Doppler measured stroke volume and intravenous fluid load response. Filling solutions were initially RL, then hydroxyethylstarch (130/0.4, Voluven®, FRESENIUS KABI FRANCE, Sevres, France) following consecutive failure of two 10 ml kg-1 crystalloid boluses. Arterial pressure and heart rate were maintained within 20% ranges of preoperative values using vasopressor agents for low values (phenylephrine 50 μg boluses), and vascular filling or sufentanil boluses for high values. All patients received intrathecal morphine (5 μgkg-1) following surgical dissection.

Postoperative analgesia was standardized (protocol established in 2014), and included morphine, paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and nefopam. Morphine was administered intrathecally as above, then intravenously by titration in the PACU. Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) was initiated before leaving PACU and continued on the ward (Protocol 1). Pain assessment employed the numerical rating scale – NRS. Pain assessments were performed every 5 min during morphine titration and every 60min during PCA (patient-controlled analgesia) or NCA (nurse-controlled analgesia) morphine administration. The pain team, a pain specialist and a nurse, were responsible for analgesia following discharge from PACU. All patients were assessed at least daily with respect to the continuation and/or modification of morphine therapy. Intravenous opioids were prescribed for a maximum of three days and then either discontinued or replaced by oral morphine. Non-opioid analgesic therapy was also standardized and given systematically 30 min before the end of surgery or in the PACU. It consisted of intravenous or oral paracetamol 15 mg kg-1 6 hourly, and intravenous ketoprofen, 1 mg kg-1 8 hourly or oral ibuprofen 10 mg kg-1 6 hourly where there was no contra-indication. Nefopam was also administered to patients 16 years or older at a dose of 0.25 mg kg-1 6 hourly. Postoperative fluid management consisted a crystalloid solution with 4% glucose and 4g of NaCl per litre (B26®, APHP, Paris, France), at 2 ml kg-1 h-1. Oral analgesics were administered from postoperative day 2: paracetamol (15 mg kg-1 6 hourly), ibuprofen (10 mg kg-1 6 hourly) and oral morphine. Oral morphine was administered in both long acting (skenan LP® 0.5 mg kg-1 -12 h-1) and short acting (actiskenan® 0.1 mg kg-1 every 4h as needed with a maximum daily dose of I mg kg-1) preparations. All patients undergone rapid postoperative rehabilitation: sitting position (or at least a 45° head-up) 6 h after surgery, rapid recovery of oral intakes at day 1 and mobilization at day1.

Protocol 1

Protocol for postoperative morphine administration after scoliosis surgery. NRS: numerical rating scale.

Postoperative intravenous morphine prescription
S: sedation scale with S0: awaken, S1: intermittently asleep but easily woken; S2: asleep but awoken by verbal stimulation; S3: asleep and awoken by tactile stimulation.
1 - Intravenous morphine titration in the postoperative acute care unit: Initial bolus: 100 ¼gkg-1
Subsequent doses: 25 ¼gkg-1 every 5-7 min to effect (NRS ≤ 3)
S2 sedation = stop titration
Usual total dose: 100-200 ¼gkg-1.
2 - PCA protocols
 Bolus only
 Bolus: 15-25 ¼gkg-1
 Refractory period: 5-10 min
 Maximum dose per 4 h: 400 ¼g kg-1
4 - Monitoring sedation scale dependent
S0 = every 4 h
S1 = hourly
5 - Additional prescriptions
Laxatives prescribed immediately upon re-feeding
Pruritus: nalbuphine 0.12mgkg-1 day-1 (10% analgesic dose), +/- hydroxyzine PRN
PONV prevention and treatment as per protocols
6 - Multimodal analgesia unless contra-indicated
Paracetamol, NSAIDs, nefopam

2.3 Data collected

Data collection was performed during hospital stay (for all outcomes of the pre, intra and early postoperative periods) and at one year at surgical follow-up (performed by the surgeons: between II and 14 months depending on patient’s availability). Data collected included: age, weight, type of surgery, ASA status, the NRS score at admission for surgery, the presence or absence of continuous pain in the 3 months before surgery (defined as a pain in the spine region limiting daily activities such as movement, sport and schooling), preoperative opioid administration in the previous 3 months, surgical duration and the number of levels fused. Further data included non-opioid and opioid analgesic administration intraoperatively and over the first five postoperative days, maximal pain at movement around the wound scar during the first five postoperative days and at 1 year post surgery, the presence of neurological damage (hypoesthesia and/or anaesthesia) in the area of wound scar during the first five postoperative days and at 1 year post surgery and DN4 (Douleur Neuropathique 4 score) [20] score (around the wound scar) at 3 days and 1 year post surgery (the complete DN4 form obtained during the surgical follow-up). Data at one year were obtained during the systematic surgical follow- up: the NRS (maximal pain at movement) and DN4 scores (around the wound scar) were considered as positive when ≥4 [1,20] and when interesting the operative area.

2.4 Statistical analysis

The primary objective of our study was to determine factors associated with the presence of a neuropathic pain at 1 year after surgery. Neuropathic pain was defined as the presence of a pain (NRS ≥ 4), the presence of signs of neurological damage within the operated area and a DN4 score ≥4 in the area around the wound scar.

Univariate analyses were performed using ANOVA (continuous variables with sample size ≥30), Mann and Whitney tests (continuous variables with sample size <30) and the X2 or Fisher’s exact test (discrete variables). Significant associated factors in univariate analysis were transformed to discrete variables by receiving- operator characteristics analysis with the cut-off defined as the value maximizing the value of J score (sensitivity + specificity). Given the main outcome, the presence of a neuropathic pain, was discrete in nature, univariate model variables with significance results of less than 0.2 were entered into a stepwise multivariate logistic model. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 20.0 software (IBM Company, Chicago, Illinois, USA).

According to previous publications [10], chronic pain after surgery was ranging from 9.5% to 60% (with a mean of 25%). Accordingly, we planned to recruit at least 40 patients in order to have 10 patients with persistent pain.

3 Results

During the study period, 75 patients had scoliosis surgery, of which 60 were idiopathic. Ten patients were excluded as they had thoracoplasty and/or anterior release. Among the 50 eligible patients, 39 agreed to participate to the study; three were excluded following secondary surgery for surgical site infection. As a result, 36 patients were included in the study. All these patients could respond French or English languages.

Detailed patient characteristics are displayed in Table 1. Nineteen patients suffered significant pain at 1 one year after the surgery (52.8% [95% confidence interval: 36.8%–68.8%]) and all presented with signs of neurological damage. Among those patients, 17 had neuropathic pain according to the DN4 scoring system (47.2% [95% confidence interval: 31.2%–63.2%]).

Table 1

Descriptive statistics. PACU: postoperative acute care unit; NRS: numerical rating scale; DN4: douleur neuropathique 4 scale.

Factors Mean±sd (and median [range]) or N (%) [95% confidence interval]
Age 15 ±2
Weight (kg) 50 ±9
Female 31 (86.1%)
ASA I & II 100%
Preoperative NRS 3±3;3 [0,9]
Continuous pain over the 3 months preceding surgery 16 (44.4% [28.4%-60.4%])
Opioid administration over the 3 months preceding surgery 0 (0%)
Duration of anaesthesia (min) 267 ± 67
Duration of surgery (min) 188 ±53
Intraoperative sufentanil administration (¼g kg-1) 1.4 ±0.5
Numberoflevel fused 10± 3
Duration of PACU stay (h) 18± 4
Total morphine in PACU (mg kg-1) 0.5 ± 0.2
Total cumulative morphine at day 1 (mgkg-1) 0.6 ± 0.2
Total morphine at day 3 (mg kg-1) 1.4 ±0.8
Total morphine at day 5 1.1 ±0.7 (mg kg-1)
Maximal NRS score in PACU 4±3; 4 [0,9]
Pain in PACU (NRS ≥ 4) 22 (61.1% [45.1%-77.1%])
Maximal NRS day 1 5 ±2; 5 [0,8]
Maximal NRS ≥ 4 during postoperative day 1 29 (80.6% [67.6%-93.6%])
Maximal NRS at day 3 5 ±2; 5 [2, 9]
Maximal NRS ≥ 4 during postoperative day 3 32 (88.9% [78.9%-98.9%])
DN4 at day 3 2.78 ±2; 3 [0,7]
DN4 ≥ 4 during postoperative day 3 12 (33.3% [18.3%-48.3%])
Neuropathic pain at day 3 12 (33.3% [18.3%-48.3%])
Maximal NRS day 5 4±2; 4 [0,8]
Maximal NRS ≥ 4 during postoperative day 5 22 (61.1% [45.1%-77.1%])
NRS at 1 year 3 ±2; 4 [0,7]
NRS ≥ 4 at 1 year 19 (52.8% [36.8%-68.8%])
DN4 at 1 year 3 ±2; 3 [0,9]
DN4 ≥ 4 at 1 year 17 (47.2% [31.2%-63.2%])
Neuropathic pain at 1 year 17 (47.2% [31.2%-63.2%])

Univariate analysis revealed the following factors to be associated with the presence of pain with a neuropathic component 1 year post surgery: NRS ≥4 (in the back area) at admission for surgery, the presence of pain in the 3 months before surgery (in the back area), maximal NRS ≥4 on postoperative day 1 (in the area around the wound scar), morphine consumption on postoperative day 1 and the presence or absence of neuropathic pain on day 3 (in the area around the scar). After transformation of day 1 morphine consumption to a discrete variable, morphine consumption at day 1 ≥0.5 mg kg-1 was associated with the presence of neuropathic pain at 1 year post surgery. Given that intensity of pain at admission for surgery (NRS ≥4) and the presence of pain in the 3 months before surgery were dependant factors only the presence of pain in the 3 months before surgery was entered in multivariate analysis.

Logistic multivariate analysis (Table 3) found the following factors independently associated with the occurrence of neuropathic pain at 1 year after surgery: preoperative pain in the 3 months before surgery and morphine consumption at day 1 ≥0.5 mg kg-1. The overall correctness predictive model was 80.6% (89.5% for patients without neuropathic pain and 70.6% for those suffering from neuropathic pain). The area under the curve of the model was 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.78–0.99).

Table 2

Univariate analysis. PACU: postoperative acute care unit; NRS: numerical rating scale; DN4: douleur neuropathique 4 scale.

Factors Neuropathic pain at 1 year(N =17) No neuropathic pain at 1 year(N =19) p
Age 14 [11,17] 15 [12,17] 0.4
Weight (kg) 50 [30, 67] 49 [30,65] 0.6
Female 15 (88.2%) 16 (84.2%) 0.5
Continuous pain over the 3 months preceding surgery 11 (64.7%) 5 (26.3%) 0.023
Duration of anaesthesia (min) 250 [180,360] 270 [120, 510] 0.3
Duration of surgery (min) 180 [120, 240] 190 [80,360] 0.4
Intraoperative sufentanil administration (¼g kg-1) 1.3 [0.5,2] 1.3 [0.7,3] 0.9
Numberoflevels fused 11 [4, 13] 10 [4,15] 0.8
Total morphine in PACU (mg kg-1) 0.5 [0.2, 1.2] 0.5 [0.1, 0.9] 0.4
Total morphine at day 1 (mg kg-1) 0.8 [0.2, 1.13] 0.4 [0.1, 0.8] 0.001
Total morphine at day 1 ≥0.5 mg kg-1 12 (70.6%) 2 (10.5%) < 0.0001
Total morphine at day 3 (mg kg-1) 1.1 [0, 3.4] 1.4 [0, 3.1] 0.8
Total morphine at day 5 (mg kg-1) 1.3 [0,1.2] 1.2 (0, 2.7] 0.5
Pain in PACU 12 (70.6%) 10 (52.6%) 0.22
Maximal NRS ≥ 4 postoperative day 1 17 (100%) 12 (63.2%) 0.006
Maximal NRS ≥ 4 postoperative day 3 16 (94.1%) 16 (84.2%) 0.34
Neuropathic pain at day 3 9 (52.9%) 3 (15.8%) 0.02
Maximal NRS ≥ 4 postoperative day 5 12 (70.6%) 10 (52.6%) 0.22
  1. Significant factors in the univariate analysis are displayed as bold

Table 3

Multivariate analysis. B: standardized regression coefficient.

Factor B Sd of B p Odd ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval of OR
Preoperative pain during the 3 months preceding surgery 2.5 1.2 0.03 13 [1.3,129]
Total morphine at day 1 ≥0.5 mg kg-1 3.7 1.2 0.002 43 [3.7, 481]

4 Discussion

The main findings of the current study can be summarized as following: after single stage posterior fixation surgery for correction of idiopathic scoliosis in children, the prevalence of chronic pain with a neuropathic component at 1 year in our sample was 47% ([95% confidence interval: 31.2%–63.2%]). Independent factors statistically associated with chronic persistent postoperative pain were the presence of preoperative pain in the 3 months before surgery and morphine consumption ≥0.5 mgkg-1 on day 1 postoperatively.

4.1 Prevalence and risk factors of chronic persistent pain

Our study found a high proportion of patients developed chronic pain despite the use of extensive preventive and curative analgesia technics during the perioperative period (gabapentin, regional and systemic opioids, and non-opioid analgesics). Previous studies in children have found the prevalence of moderate to severe chronic pain ranging from 2 (inguinal herniorraphy) to 48.5% (amputation) [10,21,22,23,24]. In adults, there are more data and the overall prevalence is estimated to be around 30% with higher percentages observed for amputation (50–85%) and thoracic surgery (50%) [8]. The high prevalence of chronic postoperative pain observed in our study may to some extent be explained by cumulating risk factors for persistent pain in the study population. Firstly, female gender has been previously identified as a major risk factor of chronic pain in adult populations [8,9,10,16] and 86.1% of our study population was female. Psychological factors such as depression and anxiety have also been implicated in the development of chronic post-surgical pain [8,9,16]. Anxiety, depression and catastrophization were previously found to be frequently present in adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis, especially during the perioperative period [22,25,26,27,28]. Finally, the extent of surgery is another identified risk factor of chronic post-surgical pain, particularly neuropathic pain, probably as a result of increased nerve injury [5,8,9,16].

Concerning the prevalence of persistent pain, our results are similar to previous studies on the same topic. Landman and collaborators [23] reported that 80% of their patient cohort suffered preoperative pain before surgery and only 40% reported reduced pain intensity 2 years after surgery. Moreover, Chidambaran and collaborators [29] reported an incidence of persistent postoperative pain of 42% in a cohort of patients undergone spinal surgery. However, our results are quite different to those published by Bastrom [24] and Sieberg [30] that described a prevalence of persistent postoperative pain of 16% and 11% at 1 and 2 years post-surgery, respectively. The discrepancies in these three studies may be due to heterogeneity in pain assessment methodology [31], differences in available psychological support [22,25] or the fluctuation of postoperative pain over time. Pain fluctuation was present in our population: 3 patients exhibiting immediate neuropathic pain were without neuropathic pain at 1 year (Table 2). Similarly, pain trajectories described in Sieberg’s study that found some patients with an improvement of pain at 1 year having worse pain at 5 years and vice versa [30].

The most important independent factor given its statistical weight was morphine consumption at day 1. Opioid-related hyperalgesia with neuropathic sensitization and progress to chronic neuropathic pain was previously described [32,33]. In contrast with our results, previous studies in adults and children have identified postoperative pain as a major predictive factor for postoperative chronic pain [8,10]. This was considered a marker of pain sensitivity and predisposition to nervous system pain sensitization. Given that postoperative pain was statistically linked to opioid consumption, both factors are probably involved as risk factors of chronic pain. Continuous preoperative pain in the three months preceding surgery was also an independent factor associated with the development of postoperative neuropathic pain in our cohort. This factor has been previously identified in paediatric patients, particularly in scoliosis surgery [23,24,29] and in adults [8,11,16,18]. Preoperative pain is thought to sensitize central and peripheral pain pathways, favouring the development of chronic neuropathic pain post-surgery [16]. Finally, day 3 neuropathic pain was not found to be independently associated with postoperative neuropathic pain at one year. Immediate neuropathic pain has been identified as a risk factor of persistent postoperative pain during abdominal surgery in adults [34,35]. Hyperalgesia at day 3 was probably not found to be an independent predictor of chronic postoperative pain in our study due to its strong association with other predictors identified in the multivariate analysis (preoperative pain, postoperative pain and opioid consumption).

Two patients described persistent non-neuropathic post-surgical pain, as described elsewhere in adult populations [8]. Early studies in the field of persistent post-surgical pain only described neuropathic pain. More recent studies describe both chronic neuropathic and less frequently non-neuropathic pain [8,10,18], as described in our population. This suggests that the development of chronic post-surgical pain is a complex and multifactorial process.

It appears that adults and children share the same mechanisms and risk factors for neuropathic post-surgical pain [8]. Preoperative pain, the extent of surgery and therefore of nerve damage, and central and peripheral nervous system sensitization by either pain or opioid agents are described as contributing factors [8,9,16].

4.2 Implication for prevention of chronic persistent pain

Given that many risk factors of chronic persistent pain (the extend of surgery and neurological damage and the female patients) are not preventable, our results strongly suggests the management of patients scheduled for scoliosis surgery repair with preoperative pain by either a chronic or acute pain team in order to decrease the preoperative sensitization. In addition, every effort should be made in order to decrease the postoperative opioid consumption. This could be achieved using a multimodal analgesia and by applying regional analgesia techniques such as epidural catheter (placed by surgeon) [36]. Finally, a better control of postoperative pain and a psychological support might also provide a substantial help in preventing the occurrence of chronic pain after surgery.

4.3 Study limitations

Our study suffers some limitations. First, the sample size was limited and some predictive factors might have not been identified as a result. However, a recent study performed on a similar type of surgically corrected idiopathic scoliosis patients identified the preoperative pain and the opioid consumption as predictors of chronic pain [29]. This strongly suggests a good external validation of our study. Another limitation of our study is the lack of reporting of the nature of preoperative pain (nociceptive versus neuropathic). Moreover, preoperative pain was evaluated before surgery and might not reflect the overall period before surgery. Further data may have further refined the predictive value of persistent postoperative pain as a function of its nature. Finally, we used the DN4 questionnaire in our study while it was not yet validated in the paediatric population. However given the age of patients included in this study, they were expected to respond as young adults. In addition, the psychological consequences of this pain and its influence on daily activities were not assessed using the DN4 questionnaire.

4.4 Conclusions and implications

Our findings indicate that despite an adequate management of postoperative pain, chronic neuropathic persistent pain occurred in 48.2% of patients. The current study identified preoperative pain and postoperative opioid consumption as independent predictors of chronic neuropathic pain after posterior fixation surgery for correction of idiopathic scoliosis in children. Patients scheduled for scoliosis surgery correction and exhibiting persistent preoperative pain should be systematically assigned to dedicated pain teams; postoperative opioid administration should be reduced as possible. We hope our results may assist those implementing preventive strategies to reduce the incidence of chronic neuropathic pain in this population.

Highlights

  • Our study aimed to characterize chronic pain after paediatric scoliosis surgery.

  • Incidence of chronic pain was 52.8%, incidence of neuropathic pain was 48.2%.

  • Risk factors were: morphine consumption at day 1 and persistent preoperative pain.

  • Patients with preoperative pain should be referred to specialized pain teams.


Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Robert Debré Hospital, 48 Bd Sérurier, 75019 Paris, France

  1. Ethical issues: This study was approved by our ethical committee and all patients gave their written consent. This study was not registered.

  2. Funding: This study was funded by institutional resources.

  3. Financial disclosure statement: No for all authors.

  4. Conflict of interest: No for all authors.

  5. Authors’ participation and involvement in the study

    Florence Julien-Marsollier: conceptualized and designed the study, collected data, corrected the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

    Raphael David: conceptualized and designed the study, collected data, verified statistics, corrected the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

    Christopher Brasher: conceptualized and designed the study, corrected the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

    D. Michelet: collected data, corrected the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

    S. Dahmani: conceptualized and designed the study, designed the data collection instruments, carried out the initial analyses and verified statistics, drafted the initial manuscript, corrected the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

References

[1] Brasher C, Gafsous B, Dugue S, Thiollier A, Kinderf J, Nivoche Y, Grace R, Dahmani S. Postoperative pain management in children and infants: an update. Paediatr Drugs 2014;16:129–40.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Walker SM, Meredith-Middleton J, Cooke-Yarborough C, Fitzgerald M. Neonatal inflammation and primary afferent terminal plasticity in the rat dorsal horn. Pain 2003;105:185–95.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Hohmeister J, Demirakça S, Zohsel K, Flor H, Hermann C. Responses to pain in school-aged children with experience in a neonatal intensive care unit: cognitive aspects and maternal influences. Eur J Pain (London, England) 2009;13:94–101.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Kristensen AD, Ahlburg P, Lauridsen MC, Jensen TS, Nikolajsen L. Chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair in children. Br J Anaesth 2012;109: 603-8.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Duale C, Ouchchane L, Schoeffler P, Group EI, Dubray C. Neuropathic aspects of persistent postsurgical pain: a French multicenter survey with 6-month prospective follow-up. J Pain 2014;15:24.e1-20.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Kurmann A, Fischer H, Dell-Kuster S, Rosenthal R, Audige L, Schupfer G, Metzger J, Honigmann P. Effect of intraoperative infiltration with local anesthesia on the development of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair: a randomized, triple-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Surgery 2015;157:144–54.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Lauridsen MH, Kristensen AD, Hjortdal VE, Jensen TS, Nikolajsen L. Chronic pain in children after cardiac surgery via sternotomy. Cardiol Young 2014;24: 893-9.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Lavand’homme P. The progression from acute to chronic pain. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2011;24:545–50.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Neil MJ, Macrae WA. Post surgical pain - the transition from acute to chronic pain. Rev Pain 2009;3:6–9.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Nikolajsen L, Brix LD. Chronic pain after surgery in children. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2014;27:507–12.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Reuben SS. Chronic pain after surgery: what can we do to prevent it. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2007;11:5–13.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Szabova A, Goldschneider K, Rose J. Special considerations and recommendations for interventions for pediatric chronic pain. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2012;50:120–9.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Walco GA, Dworkin RH, Krane EJ, LeBel AA, Treede R-D. Neuropathic pain in children: special considerations.Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85:S33–41.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Mathew E, Kim E, Goldschneider KR. Pharmacological treatment of chronic non-cancer pain in pediatric patients. Paediatr Drugs 2014;16:457–71.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Molton IR, Graham C, Stoelb BL, Jensen MP. Current psychological approaches to the management of chronic pain. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2007;20:485–9.Search in Google Scholar

[16] McGreevy K, Bottros MM, Raja SN. Preventing chronic pain following acute pain: risk factors, preventive strategies, and their efficacy. Eur J Pain Suppl 2011;5:365–72.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Page MG, Stinson J, Campbell F, Isaac L, Katz J. Identification of pain-related psychological risk factors for the development and maintenance of pediatric chronic postsurgical pain. J Pain Res 2013;6:167–80.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Shipton EA. The transition from acute to chronic post surgical pain. Anaesth Intens Care 2011;39:824–36.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Dupuis C, Michelet D, Hilly J, Diallo T, Vidal C, Delivet H, Nivoche Y, Mazda K, Dahmani S. Predictive factors for homologous transfusion during paediatric scoliosis surgery. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2015;34: 327-32.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Bouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H, Boureau F, Brochet B, Bruxelle J, Cunin G, Fermanian J, Ginies P, Grun-Overdyking A, Jafari-Schluep H, Lantéri-Minet M, Laurent B, Mick G, Serrie A, Valade D, Vicaut E. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). Pain 2005;114:29–36.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Fortier MA, Chou J, Maurer EL, Kain ZN. Acute to chronic postoperative pain in children: preliminary findings. J PediatrSurg 2011;46:1700–5.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Kahanovitz N, Weiser S. The psychological impact of idiopathic scoliosis on the adolescent female. A preliminary multi-centerstudy.Spine 1989;14:483–5.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Landman Z, Oswald T, Sanders J, Diab M, Spinal Deformity Study Group. Prevalence and predictors of pain in surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2011;36:825–9.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Bastrom TP, Marks MC, Yaszay B, Newton PO, Harms Study G. Prevalence of postoperative pain in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and the association with preoperative pain. Spine 2013;38:1848–52.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Lindeman M, Behm K. Cognitive strategies and self-esteem as predictors of brace-wear noncompliance in patients with idiopathic scoliosis and kyphosis. J PediatrOrthoped 1999;19:493–9.Search in Google Scholar

[26] MacLean WE, Green NE, Pierre CB, Ray DC. Stress and coping with scoliosis: psychological effects on adolescents and their families. J Pediatr Orthoped 1989;9:257–61.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Noonan KJ, Dolan LA, Jacobson WC, Weinstein SL. Long-term psychosocial characteristics of patients treated for idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthoped 1997;17:712–7.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Sinclair CM, Meredith P, Strong J, Feeney R. Personal and contextual factors affecting the functional ability of children and adolescents with chronic pain: a systematic review. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2016;37:327–42.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Chidambaran V, Ding L, Moore DL, Spruance K, Cudilo EM, Pilipenko V, Hossain M, Sturm P, Kashikar-Zuck S, Martin LJ, Sadhasivam S. Predicting the pain continuum after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a prospective cohort study. EurJ Pain (London, England) 2017;21:1252–65.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Sieberg CB, Simons LE, Edelstein MR, DeAngelis MR, Pielech M, Sethna N, Hresko MT. Pain prevalence and trajectories following pediatric spinal fusion surgery. J Pain 2013;14:1694–702.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Monticone M, Nava C, Leggero V, Rocca B, Salvaderi S, Ferrante S, Ambrosini E. Measurement properties of translated versions of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire, SRS-22: a systematic review. Qual Life Res: Int J Qual Life Asp Treatment Care Rehabil 2015;24:1981–98.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Fletcher D, Martinez V. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia in patients after surgery: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. BrJ Anaesth 2014;112:991–1004.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Roeckel L-A, Le Coz G-M, Gavériaux-Ruff C, Simonin F. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia: cellular and molecular mechanisms. Neuroscience 2016;338:160–82.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Wilder-Smith OH, Schreyer T, Scheffer GJ, Arendt-Nielsen L. Patients with chronic pain after abdominal surgeryshow less preoperative endogenous pain inhibition and more postoperative hyperalgesia: a pilot study. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 2010;24:119–28.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Wilder-Smith OHG. Chronic pain and surgery: a review of new insights from sensory testing. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 2011;25:146–59.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Taenzer AH, Clark C. Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia in adolescent scoliosis surgery: a meta-analysis. Paediatr Anaesth 2010;20:135–43.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-08-27
Revised: 2017-09-01
Accepted: 2017-09-02
Published Online: 2017-10-01
Published in Print: 2017-10-01

© 2017 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain

Downloaded on 31.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.09.002/html
Scroll to top button