Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Differentiating Peer Contexts and Risk for Adolescent Substance Use

  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The peer context is perhaps the most salient, robust predictor of an adolescent's substance use. However, in previous studies, the peer context is often poorly defined. The current study examined 3 models to understand how substance use within best friendships, peer cliques, and social crowds predicts adolescents' substance involvement. A sample of 377 high school juniors and seniors completed surveys assessing substance use and peer relationships. Results suggest that each of these 3 dimensions of the peer context uniquely predict adolescent substance use. Moreover, these peer contexts interacted in the prediction of adolescents' substance use such that adolescents who were more highly embedded in substance-using peer contexts showed greater risk for substance use whereas adolescents with substance-using best friends showed a reduced risk for substance use if they had other close friends who were less involved with substances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aiken, L. S., and West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage, Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, R. (1992). Short form of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Psychol. Rep. 71: 1155–1160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank, L., and Patterson, G. R. (1992). The use of structural equation modeling in combining data from different types of assessment. In Rosen, J., and Reynolds, P. (eds.), Recent Advances in Psychological Assessment (Vol. 8). Plenum, New York, pp. 41–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, K. E., and Ennett, S. T. (1994). Peer influence on adolescent drug use. Am. Psychol. 49: 820–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borden, L. M., Donnermeyer, J. F., and Scheer, S. D. (2001). The influence of extra-curricular activities and peer influence on substance use. Adolesc. Fam. Health 2: 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B. (1990). Peer groups and peer culture. In Feldman, S. S., and Elliott, G. R. (eds.), At the Threshold: The Developing Adolescent. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 171–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B., Dolcini, M. M., and Leventhal, A. (1997). Transformations in peer relationships at adolescence: Implications for healthrelated behavior. In Schulenberg, J., Maggs, J. L., and Hurrelmann, K. (eds.), Health Risks and Developmental Transitions During Adolescence. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 161–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B., Eicher, S. A., and Petrie, S. (1986). The importance of peer group (“crowd”) affiliation in adolescence. J. Adolesc. 9: 73–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B., Lohr, M. J., and Trujillo, C. (1990). Multiple crowds and multiple life styles: Adolescents’ perceptions of peer group stereotypes. In Muuss, R. E. (ed.), Adolescent Behavior and Society (4th edn.). McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, R. B., and Cairns, B. D. (1994). Lifelines and Risks: Pathways of Youth in our Time. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chassin, L. A. (1984). Adolescent substance use and abuse. In Karoly, P., and Steffen, J. J. (eds.), Adolescent Behavior Disorders: Foundations and Contemporary Concerns. Lexington, Lexington, MA, pp. 99–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chassin, L., Rogosch, F., and Barrera, M. (1991). Substance use and symptomatology among adolescent children of alcoholics. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 100: 449–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clasen, D. R., and Brown, B. B. (1985). The multidimensionality of peer pressure in adolescence. J. Youth Adolesc. 14: 451–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crockett, L., Losoff, M., and Petersen, A. C. (1984). Perceptions of the peer group and friendship in early adolescence. J. Early Adolesc. 4: 155–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., and Marlowe, D. (1960).Anewscale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J. Counsel. Psychol. 24: 349–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, P. J., Stice, E., and Chassin, L. A. (1997). The relation between adolescent alcohol use and peer alcohol use: A longitudinal random coefficients model. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 65: 130–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, W. R., and Rose, S. R. (1991). The relationship of adolescent peer groups to the incidence of psychosocial problems. Adolescence 26: 473–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennett, S. T., and Bauman, K. E. (1993). Peer group structure and adolescent cigarette smoking: A social network analysis. J. Health Soc. Behav. 34: 226–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennett, S. T., and Bauman, K. E. (1994). The contribution of influence and selection to adolescent peer group homogeneity: The case of adolescent cigarette smoking. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67: 653–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, K. G., Crosnoe, R., and Dornbusch, S. M. (2000). A social process model of adolescent deviance: Combining social control and differential association perspectives. J. Youth Adolesc. 29: 395–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, L. A., and Bauman, K. E. (1988). Influence and selection in the friend-adolescent relationship: Findings from studies of adolescent smoking and drinking. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 18: 289–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W., Marks, G., and Hansen, W. B. (1991). Social influence processes affecting adolescent substance use. J. Appl. Psychol. 76: 291–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartup, W. W. (1996). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental significance. Child Dev. 67: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D. J., Catalano, R. F., and Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychol. Bull. 112: 64–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussong, A. M. (2000). Perceived peer context and adolescent adjustment. J. Res. Adolesc. 4: 391–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ianotti, R. J., Bush, P. J., and Weinfurt, K. P. (1996). Perception of friends’ use of alcohol, cigarettes, and marijuana among urban schoolchildren: A longitudinal analysis. Addict. Behav. 21: 615–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., and Bachman, J. G. (1995). National Survey Results on Drug Use From the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975-1994. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection and socialization in adolescent friendships. Am. J. Sociol. 84: 427–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, G., Kaufman, A.V., Dressler,W.W., and LeCroy, C.W. (1999). Psychosocial moderators of substance use among middle schoolaged adolescents. J. Drug Educ. 29: 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mounts, N. S., and Steinberg, L. (1995). An ecological analysis of peer influence on adolescent grade point average and drug use. Dev. Psychol. 31: 915–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oetting, E. R., and Beauvais, F. (1986). Peer cluster theory: Drugs and the adolescent. J. Consult. Dev. 65: 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. G., and Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Dev. Psychol. 29: 611–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockhill, C. M. (1995, March). Depressed children's friendships. Poster session presented at The Biennial Conference for the Society for Research in Child Development, Indianapolis, IN.

  • Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 57: 316–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolson, J. M., and Urberg, K. A. (1993). Similarity between adolescent best friends. J. Adolesc. Res. 8: 274–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urberg, K. A. (1992). Locus of peer influence: Social crowd and best friend. J. Youth Adolesc. 21: 439–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urberg, K. A., Degirmencioglu, S. M., and Pilgrim, C. (1997). Close friend and group influence on adolescent cigarette smoking and alcohol use. Dev. Psychol. 33: 834–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urberg, K. A., Degirmencioglu, S. M., Tolson, J. M. (1998). Adolescent friendship selection and termination: The role of similarity. J. Soc. Pers. Relation. 15: 703–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urberg, K. A., Degirmencioglu, S. M., Tolson, J. M., and Halliday-Scher, K. (1995). The structure of the peer network. Dev. Psychol. 31: 540–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urberg, K. A., Degirmencioglu, S. M., Tolson, J. M., and Halliday-Scher, K. (2000). Adolescent social crowds: Measurement and relationship to friendships. J. Adolesc. Res. 15: 427–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, T. A. (1986). Stress and coping in early adolescence: Relationships to substance use in urban school samples. Health Psychol. 5: 503–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, T. A., and Cleary, S. D. (1999). Peer and adolescent substance use among 6th-9th graders: Latent growth analyses of influence versus selection mechanisms. Health Psychol. 18: 453–463.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA

    Andrea M. Hussong (Assistant Professor)

Authors
  1. Andrea M. Hussong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hussong, A.M. Differentiating Peer Contexts and Risk for Adolescent Substance Use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 31, 207–220 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015085203097

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015085203097

Search

Navigation