Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of Technical and Functional Quality on Patient Perceptions of Pharmaceutical Service Quality

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. To evaluate the relative importance of functional quality (how services were provided) and technical quality (what was received for those services) on patient perceptions of pharmaceutical service quality.

Methods. A scenario-based experimental design was chosen to manipulate functional (FQ) and technical quality (TQ). Subjects were asked to read one of four scenarios describing a pharmacy service experience and imagine that he or she were in the situation described. High and low TQ were manipulated by describing the presence or absence of a prescription medication dispensing error made by the pharmacist in the scenario. Each subject completed a survey about their evaluations of the service provided in the scenario. An ANOVA using a 2 × 2 completely randomized factorial design was conducted to compare the effects of TQ, FQ, and their interaction on perceptions of service quality and behavioral intention. Effect sizes were measured with the calculation of omega-square.

Results. FQ had the greatest impact on patient perceptions of service quality and behavioral intentions. FQ explained 44% of the variance in service quality and 39% in intention to return. TQ and the interaction accounted for a significant but much lesser effect. The interaction showed that the effect of FQ was greatest under conditions of high TQ. There were no significant associations between any demographic characteristics and responses to service quality.

Conclusions. The results suggest that FQ has the greatest impact on consumer perceptions of pharmaceutical service quality even under conditions of an obvious example of low TQ which respondents perceive as serious and possibly harmful. This study underscores the limitations of relying on patient perceptions in evaluating pharmaceutical services. Although patient evaluations are important, they can be inadequate for assessing the professional quality of services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. V. Meade. Patients satisfied with pharmacy service, survey shows. Amer. Pharm. 34:26-28 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Biesacher and R. Corey. Patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical services at independent and chain pharmacies. Amer. J. Health-Systems Pharm. 54:531-6 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Parasuraman, V. Zeithaml, and L. Berry. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J. Marketing 49:41-50 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. J. Bitner. Evaluating service encounters: the effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. J. Marketing 54:69-82 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. N. Bolton and J. H. Drew. A multistage model of customers' assessments of service quality and value. J. Consumer Res. 17:375-84 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. D. Buzzell and B. T. Gale. The PIMS Principles. New York: The Free Press; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. D. Phillips, D. R. Chang, and R. D. Buzzell. Product quality, cost position and business performance: a test of some key hypotheses. J. Marketing 47:26-43 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. G. Woodside, L. L. Frey, and R. T. Daly. Linking service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intention. J. Health Care Market. 9:5-17 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. E. Headley and S. J. Miller. Measuring service quality and its relationship to future consumer behavior. J. Health Care Market. 13:32-41 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. T. Koska. High-quality care and hospital profits: is there a link? Hospitals 64:62-63 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Gronroos. Toward a third phase in service quality research: challenges and future directions. Ad. Services Market. Management 2:49-64 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. W. Brown and T. Schwartz. A gap analysis of professional service quality. J. Marketing 53:92-98 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Nelson. Information and consumer behavior. J. Polit. Econ. 78: 311-329 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. R. Darby and E. Karni. Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. J. Law Econ. 16:67-86 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. B. Murray. Health care service decision influences: an exploratory investigation of search and nonsearch criteria for professionals and patients. J. Health Care Market. 12:24-38 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. P. Gagnon. Factors affecting pharmacy patronage motives-a literature review. J. Amer. Pharm. Assoc. ns17:556-59, 566 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. B. Wiederholt. Development of an instrument to measure evaluative criteria that patients use in selecting a pharmacy for obtaining prescription drugs. J. Pharm. Market. Management 1:35-59 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. S. Lytle and M. P. Mokwa. Evaluating health care quality: the moderating role of outcomes. J. Health Care Market. 12:4-14 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Powpaka. The role of outcome quality as a determinant of overall service quality in different categories of services industries: an empirical investigation. J. Services Market. 10:5-25 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  20. V. S. Folkes. Consumer reactions to product failure: an attributional approach. J. Consumer Res. 10:398-409 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Dolinsky. A consumer complaint framework with resulting strategies: An application to higher education. J. Services Marketing 8:27-39 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. F. Surprenant and M. R. Solomon. Predictability and personalization in the service encounter. J. Marketing 51:86-96 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Cohen. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Second Edition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. M. Carman. Consumer perceptions of service quality: an assessment of SERVQUAL dimensions. J. Retailing 66:33-55 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. J. Cronin and S. A. Taylor. Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. J. Marketing 56:55-68 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. J. Cronin and S. A. Taylor. SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL: Reconciling performance-based and perceptions-minus-expectations measurement of service quality. J. Marketing 58:125-131 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. K. Teas. Expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality. J. Marketing 58:132-139 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. K. Teas. Expectations, performance, evaluation, and consumers' perceptions of quality. J. Marketing 57:18-34 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Introduction to Analysis-of-Variance Procedures. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, Fourth Edition, Volume 1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1989.

  30. Engel, R. D. Blackwell, and P. W. Miniard. Consumer Behavior. The Dryden Press: Orlando, Florida, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. Rosenthal and R. L. Rosnow. Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis. McGraw Hill Co: New York, NY, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. L. Oliver. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J. Marketing Res. 17:460-69 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  33. C. Webster. Influences upon consumer expectations of services. J. Services Market. 5:5-17 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pharmacy Administration, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University (MCV Campus), Richmond, Virginia. To whom correspondence should be addressed

    David Holdford (Assistant Professor of)

  2. School of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina

    Richard Schulz (Professor of Pharmacy Administration)

Authors
  1. David Holdford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard Schulz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Holdford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holdford, D., Schulz, R. Effect of Technical and Functional Quality on Patient Perceptions of Pharmaceutical Service Quality. Pharm Res 16, 1344–1351 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018934621859

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018934621859

Search

Navigation