Abstract
There are continuing debates on methodological issues of policy science. On the one hand, the unprecedented advancement in research methods and technology has made it possible to formulate more precise, empirically driven models of scientific inquiries and thus has added credibility on positivist approach of policy science. On the other hand, social systems and subjective values have increasingly been emphasized in policy analyses and have served as impetus to postpositivist approach of policy science. In this essay, I discuss the role of democratization and citizen participation in policy science. While citizen participation is important to ensure democratization of the process of policymaking and to improve the quality of information provided to make appropriate policy decisions, how such citizen participation can be acquired has become another pressing issue. I explore community participation in light of assessing its effectiveness in policymaking and its coherence with the role of policy experts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albaek, E. (1995). ‘Between knowledge and power: Utilization of social science in public policy-making,’ Policy Sciences 28: 79-00.
Barlow, J. (1995): Public Participation in Urban Development: The European Experience. London, NW: Policy Studies Institute.
Berry, J. M., K. E. Portney and K. Thompson (1993). The Rebirth of Urban Democracy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Bobrow, D. B. and J. S. Dryzek (1987). Policy Analysis by Design. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Boff, L. (1995). Ecology and Liberation: A New Paradigm. Translated by John Cumming from Italian. New York, NY: Orbis Books.
Bond, G. C. and A. Gillian (1994). ‘Introduction,’ in G. Bond and A. Gilliam, eds., Social Construction of the Past: Representation as Power. New York, NY: Roudledge, pp. 1-22.
Burnham, W. D. (1982). The Current Crisis in American Politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Chambers, E. (1986). ‘The cultures of science and policy,’ in W. Dunn, ed., Policy Analysis: Perspectives, Concepts and Methods. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 93-110.
DeLeon, P. (1997). Democracy and the Policy Sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
DeLeon, P. (1995). ‘Democratic values and the policy sciences,’ American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 886-905.
DeLeon, P. (1994). ‘Reinventing the policy sciences: Three steps back to the future,’ Policy Sciences 27: 77-95.
DeLeon, P. (1988). Advice and Consent. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Donovan, M. C. (1993). ‘Social constructions of people with aids: Target populations and United States policy, 1980-1990,’ Policy Studies Review 12 (3): 3-29.
Doron, G. (1992a). ‘Policy sciences: The state of the discipline,’ Policy Studies Review 11 (3): 303-309.
Doron, G. (1992b). ‘Rational choice and policy sciences,’ Policy Studies Review 11 (3): 359-369.
Dryzek, J. (1990). Discursive Democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Dryzek, J. S. and D. Torgerson (1993). ‘Democracy and policy sciences: A progress report,’ Policy Sciences 26: 127-137.
Dunn, W. (1993). ‘Policy reforms as arguments,’ in F. Fischer and J. Forester, eds., The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Chapel Hil, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 254-290
Durning, D. (1993). ‘Participatory policy analysis in a social service agancy: A case study,’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 12 (2): 231-257.
Fischer, F. (1998). ‘Beyond empiricism: Policy inquiry in postpositivist perspective,’ Policy Studies Journal 26 (1), 129-146.
Fischer, F. (1995). Evaluating Public Policy. Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall Publishers.
Fischer, F. (1993). ‘Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical case,’ Policy Sciences 26: 165-187.
Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Garson, D. G. (1986). ‘From policy science to policy analysis: A quarter century of progress,’ in W. Dunn, ed., Policy Analysis: Perspectives, Concepts, and Methods, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 3-22.
Green, A. J. (1997). ‘Public participation and environmental policy outcomes,’ Canadian Public Policy XXIII (4): 435-458.
Hendrich, R. and D. Nachmias (1992). ‘The policy sciences: The challenge of complexity,’ Policy Studies Review 11 (3): 310-328.
Hilgard, E. R. and D. Lerner (1951). ‘The person: Subject and object of science and policy,’ in D. Lerner and H. Lasswell, eds., The Policy Sciences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Ingram, H. and A. Schneider (1993a). ‘Constructing citizenship: The subtle messages of policy design,’ in H. Ingram and S. Smith, eds., Public Policy for Democracy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, pp. 68-94.
Jacobs, L. R. and R.Y. Shapiro (1994). ‘Public opinion, institutions, and policy making,’ Political Science and Politics 27 (1): 9-38.
Judge, A. J. (1994). NGOs and Civil Society: Some Realities and Distortions. A paper presented in a seminar on ‘state and Society’ at the Russian Public Policy Center, Moscow in December. Brussels: Union of International Associations.
Lasswell, H. D. (1948). Power and Personality. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Lasswell, H. D. (1951). ‘The policy orientation,’ in D. Lerner and H. Lasswell, eds., The Policy Sciences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 3-15.
Lichterman, P. (1996). The Search for Political Community: American Activists Reinventing Commitment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
MacRae, D. Jr. and D. Whittington (1997). Expert Advice for Policy Choice: Analysis and Discourse. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
MacRae, D. Jr. (1986). ‘Democratic information systems: Policy indicators and public statistics,’ in W. Dunn, ed., Policy Analysis: Perspectives, Concepts and Methods. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 131-168.
Marinoff, J. (1997). ‘There is enough time: Rethinking the process of policy development,’ Social Justice 24 (4): 234-246.
Meier, K. J. (1982). ‘Political economy and cost-benefit analysis: Problems of bias,’ in A. Stone and E. Harpham, eds., The Political Economy of Public Policy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 143-162.
Mill, J. S. (1995). On Liberty. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
O'Connor, K. and L. Epstein (1984). ‘The role of interest groups in supreme court policy formation,’ in R. Keystone, ed., Public Policy Formation. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 63-81.
Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Democracy in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Quirk P. J. and J. Hinchliffe (1998). ‘The rising hegemony of mass opinion,’ Journal of Policy History 10 (1): 19-33.
Redburn, F. S. and T. F. Buss (1984). ‘Religious leaders as policy advocates: The Youngstown Steel Mill closing,’ in R. Keystone, ed., Public Policy Formation. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 83-94.
Rein, M. (1976). Social Science and Public Policy. New York, NY: Penguin.
Renn, O., T. Webber, H. Rakel, P. Daniel and B. Johnson (1993). ‘Public participation in decision making: A tree-step procedure,’ Policy Sciences 26 (3): 189-214.
Rixecker, S. (1994). ‘Expanding the discursive context of policy design: A matter of feminist standpoint episteology,’ Policy Sciences 27: 119-142.
Rotberg, R. I. (1999). ‘Social capital and political culture in Africa, America, Australia, and Europe,’ Journal of Interdisciplinary History XXIX (3): 339-356.
Schneider, A. and H. Ingram (1997). Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Schneider, A. and H. Ingram (1993b). ‘Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy,’ American Political Science Review 87 (2): 334-347.
Schearer, S. B., M. D. Olivera and R. Tandon (1997). ‘A strategic guide to resource enhancement,’ in L. Fox and S. Schearer, eds., Sustaining Civil Society: Strategies for Resource Mobilization. Washington, DC: CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation, pp. 13-20.
Smith, S. R. and H. Ingram (1993). ‘Public policy and democracy,’ in S. Smith and H. Ingram, eds., Public Policy for Democracy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, pp. 1-14.
Stone, D. (1997). Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
Thomas, J. C. (1995). Public Participation in Public Decisions: New Skills and Strategies for Public Managers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Thornton, J. (1991). ‘Risking democracy,’ Greenpeace (March/April): 14-17.
Tribe, L. J. (1972). ‘Policy science: Analysis or ideology,’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 2: 66-110.
Tulloss, J. K. (1995). ‘Citizen participation in Boston development policy: The political economy of participation,’ Urban Affairs Review 30 (4): 514-537.
Verba, S., K. L. Schlozman and H. E. Brady (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wagchal, U. (1997). ‘Direct democracy and public policymaking,’ Journal of Public Policy 17 (3): 223-245.
Weaver, J. H., M. T. Rock and K. Kusterer (1997). Achieving Broad-Based Sustainable Development: Governance, Environment, and Economic Growth with Equity. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
Weimer, D. L. (1998). ‘Policy analysis and evidence: A craft perspective,’ Policy Studies Journal 26 (1): 114-128.
Weiss, C. H. (1997). ‘Research for policy's shake: The enlightenment function of social research,’ Policy Analysis 3: 553-565.
Wildavsky, A. (1979). Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
Winner, L. (1986). The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wagle, U. The policy science of democracy: The issues of methodology and citizen participation. Policy Sciences 33, 207–223 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026500906034
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026500906034