Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction to the Special Issue: Defining Gender, Relationships, and Power

  • Introduction
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Limitations in our knowledge of women's lives are most strikingly revealed by social scientists' attempts to respond to the HIV/AIDS crisis. Most psychological research studies Anglo middle- and upper-middle-class college students, to the detriment of our current need for knowledge of the populations of women most at risk for HIV/AIDS, who are non-Anglo, poor, and less educated. This special issue was initiated by the Task Force on Women and HIV of the Society for the Psychology of Women, Division 35 of the American Psychological Association. Our immediate objective was to present in a single issue a full range of current research practices and needs along with any exemplary innovations, and to identify the dilemmas facing investigators that might be blocking theory development. We hope to inspire, inform, and energize those whose contributions are most needed to advance theory and research that will be helpful to researchers and practitioners of HIV prevention and services. The long-range goal of this special issue is to stimulate innovative and useful theory development by gathering empirical work that challenges current theory and shows the role of culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Amaro, H.(1995). Love, sex, and power: Considering women's realities in HIV prevention. American Psychologist, 50, 437–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaro, H., & Raj, A. (2000). On the margin: Power and women'sHIV risk reduction strategies. Sex Roles, this issue.

  • Auerbach, J. D., Wypijewska, C., & Brodie, H. K. H. (1994). AIDS and behavior: An integrated approach. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, J., Myers, H. F., Durvasula, R. S., Wyatt, G. E., & Cheng, M. (1999). The impact of relationship violence, HIV and ethnicity on adjustment in women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 5, 263–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beadnell, B., Baker, S. A., Morrison, D. M., & Knox, K. (2000). HIV/STD risk factors for women with violent male partners. Sex Roles, this issue.

  • Bedimo, A. L., Kissinger, P., Dumestre, J., & Clark, R. (1998). Psychosocial and behavioral factors associated with physical and sexual abuse among HIV-infected women. Presented at the XIIth World AIDS Conference, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Berkman, L. F. (1984). Assessing the physical health effects of social networks and social support. Annual Review of Public Health, 5, 413–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowleg, L., Belgrave, F. Z., & Reisen, C. A. (2000). Gender roles, power strategies, and precautionary sexual self-efficacy: Implications for Black and Latina women's HIV/AIDS protective behaviors. Sex Roles, this issue.

  • Britton, B. M. (1998). Gender, power and HIV: The impact of partner violence in the context of poverty on women's risk of infection in the USA. Presented at the XIIth World AIDS Conference, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Carli, L. L. (1999). Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, D. (2000). The close relationship context and HIV/AIDS risk reduction among Mexican Americans. Sex Roles, this issue.

  • Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S., & Grote, N. K. (1998). Why aren't indices of relationship costs always negatively related to indices of relationship quality? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 2–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. A., & Fonow, M.M. (1986). Knowledge and women's interests: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research. Sociological Inquiry, 56, 2–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M., & Kimmel, E. (1999). Promoting methodological diversity in feminist research.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M., & Marecek, J. (1989). Psychology reconstructs the female. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 147–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K. (1999). An overview of research on gender: Four themes from 3 decades. In W. B. Swann, Jr., & J. H. Langlois (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 11–33). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVault, M. L. (1996). Talking back to sociology: Distinctive contributions of feminist methodology.Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic perspectives on gender and the cultural context of love and intimacy. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G., & Strachan, C. E. (1987). Motivational needs for power and spouse-specific assertiveness in assaultive and nonassaultive men. Violence and Victims, 2, 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falbo, T., & Peplau, L. A. (1980). Power strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 618–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieze, I. H., & McHugh, M. C. (1992). Power and influence strategies in violent and nonviolent marriages. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 449–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines, S. O., Jr. (1997). Culture, ethnicity, and personal relationship processes. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavey, N., & McPhillips, K. (1999). Subject to romance: Heterosexual passivity as an obstacle to women initiating condom use. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 349–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genero, N. P., Miller, J. B., Surrey, J., & Baldwin, L. M. (1992). Measuring perceived mutuality in close relationships: Validation of the Mutual Psychological Development Questionnaire.Journal of Family Psychology, 6, 36–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griscom, J. L. (1992). Women and power: Definition, dualism, and difference. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 389–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, F. K., Gilbert, L. A., Genero, N. P., Hawes, S. E., Hyde, J. S., & Marecek, J. (1997). Feminist research: Practice and problems. In J. Worell & N. G. Johnson (Eds.), Shaping the future of feminist psychology: Education, research, and practice (pp. 73–92).Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, L. M. (1990). Working with women of color: An empowerment perspective. Social Work, 35, 149–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, L., Oh, H. J., & Gillmore, M. R. (2000). Toward an understanding of (Em)power( Ment) for HIV/AIDS prevention with adolescent women. Sex Roles, this issue.

  • Hall, R. M., & Sandler, B. R. (1982). The classroom climate:A chilly one for women? Project on the Status and Education of Women. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, B. G. (1995). General systems theory beginning with wholes. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartling, L. M., & Luchetta, T. (1999). Humiliation: Assessing the impact of derision, degradation, and debasement. Journal of Primary Prevention, 19, 259–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebling, E. M., & Otávio, R. L. (1998). Women and AIDS:Gender relations and risk behaviors.Presented at the XII World AIDS Conference, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Henley, N. M. (1977). Body politics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, J. S., Landis, K. R., & Umberson, D. (1988). Social relationships and health. Science, 241, 540–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, J. S., Umberson, D., & Landis, K. R. (1988). Structures and processes of social support.Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 293–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jemmott, L. S., Catan, V., Nyamathi, A., & Anastasia, J. (1995). African American women and HIV-risk-reduction issues. In A. O'Leary & L. S. Jemmott (Eds.), Women at risk: Issues in the primary prevention of AIDS. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S. R. (1994a). Need for power and women's careers over 14 years: Structural power, job satisfaction, and motive change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 155–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S. R. (1994b). Structural power and experienced job satisfaction: The empowerment paradox for women. Sex Roles, 30, 347–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S. R., & Coons, H. L. (1996). Psychosocial stress and adaptation processes for women coping with HIV/AIDS. In A. O'Leary & L. S. Sweet-Jemmott (Eds.). Women and AIDS: Coping and care. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. V. (Ed.). (1997). Women's growth in diversity. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. V., Kaplan, A. G., Miller, J. G., Stiver, I. P., & Surrey, J. L. (Eds.). (1991). Women's growth in connection: Writings from the Stone Center. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalbfleisch, P. J., & Cody, M. J. (Eds.) (1995). Gender, power, and communication in human relationships. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. F. (1978). Gender and science. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought: A Quarterly of Integrative and Interdisciplinary Studies, 1, 409–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M. L., & Schooler, C. (1983). Work and personality. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landrine, H. (1995). Introduction: Cultural diversity, contextualism, and feminist psychology.In H. Landrine (Ed.), Bringing cultural diversity to feminist psychology: Theory, research, and practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landrine, H., Klonoff, E. A., & Brown-Collins, A. (1995). Cultural diversity and methodology in feminist psychology: Critique, proposal, empirical example. In H. Landrine (Ed.), Bringing cultural diversity to feminist psychology: Theory, research, and practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, M., & Wild, C. L. (1991). The impact of the feminist critique on tests, assessment, and methodology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 581–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, B., Tracy, A., Taylor, C., Williams, L. M., Jordan, J., & Miller, J. B. (2000). The relational health indices: A study of women's relationships. Unpublished manuscript, Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liem, J. H., O'Toole, J. G., & James, J. B. (1996). Themes of power and betrayal in sexual abuse survivors' characterizations of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9, 745–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman-Blumen, J. (1994). The existential bases of power relationships: The gender role case.In H. L. Radtke & H. J. Stam (Eds.), Power/gender: Social relations in theory and practice (pp. 108–135). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lips, H. M. (1991). Women, men and power. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lips, H. M. (1994). Female powerlessness: A case of “cultural preparedness”? In H. L. Radtke & H. J. Stam (Eds.), Power/gender: Social relations in theory and practice (pp. 89–107). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lown, E. A., Winkler, K., Fullilove, R. E., & Fullilove, M. T. (1993). Tossin' and tweakin': Women's consciousness in the crack culture. In C. Squire (Ed.), Women and AIDS: Psychological perspectives (Chapter 4, pp. 90–105). Newbury Park CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lykes, M. B. (1985). Gender and individualistic vs. collectivist bases for notions about the self. Journal of Personality, 53, 356–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marecek, J. (1989). Introduction to special issue: Theory and method in feminist psychology.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 367–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, A., & Blankenship, V. (1987). Power and affiliation motivation, stress, and abuse in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, C., & Boyle, M. (1995). Risky heterosexual practices amongst women over 30: Gender, power and long term relationships. AIDS Care, 7, 277–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1975). Power: The inner experience. New York: Irvington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C., Colman, C., Finn, K., & Winter, D. (1979). Motivation and maturity patterns in marital success. Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. L., & Cummins, A. G. (1992). An examination of women's perspectives on power.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 415–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. R., & Swanson, G. E. (1958). The changing American parent: A study in the Detroit area. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. B. (1991). Women and power. In J. V. Jordan, A. G. Kaplan, J. B. Miller, I. P. Stiver, & J. L. Surrey (Eds.), Women's growth in connection: Writings from the Stone Center. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G. (1978). Living systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J., Schoenbaum, E., Warren, D., Schuman, P., Rompalo, A., Fiore, T., & Kennedy, M. (1998). Barriers to condom use identified by HIV infected and at-risk women. Presented at the XII World AIDS Conference, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Morawski, J. G. (1985). Themeasurement of masculinity and femininity: Engendering categorical realities. Journal of Personality, 53, 196–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawski, J. (1997). The science behind feminist research methods. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 667–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrow, D. G., & Kessler, R. C. (Eds.). (1993). Methodological issues in AIDS behavioral research. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, K. A., Long, B. C., & Linn, R. (1994). Relationships and the meaning of power for disadvantaged women. Feminism and Psychology, 4, 229–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H., Sonenstein, F. L., & Ku, L. C. (1993). Masculinity ideology: Its impact on adolescent males' heterosexual relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulerwitz, J., Gortmaker, S. L., & DeJong, W. (2000). Measuring sexual relationship power in HIV/STD research. Sex Roles, this issue.

  • Quina, K., Harlow, L. L., Morokoff, P. J., Burkholder, G., & Dieter, P. J. (2000). Sexual communication in relationships: When words speak louder than actions. Sex Roles, this issue.

  • Radtke, H. L., & Stam, H. J. (Eds.). (1994). Power/gender: Social relations in theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragins, B. R., & Sundstrom, E. (1989). Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 51–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, P. T. (1993). Poor women in psychological research: Shut up and shut out. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 133–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, P. T. (2000). Women, ethnicity, and AIDS: What's love got to do with it? Sex Roles, this issue.

  • Reid, P. T., & Kelly, E. (1994). Research on women of color: From ignorance to awareness.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 477–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riger, S. (1992). Epistemological debates, feminist voices: Science, social values, and the study of women. American Psychologist, 47, 730–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, D., & Eckenrode, J. (1986). Social ties: Subgroup differences in costs and benefits.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 770–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruesch, J., & Bateson, G. (1951). Communication: The social matrix of psychiatry. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagrestano, L. M., Heavey, C. L., & Christensen, A. (1999). Perceived power and physical violence in marital conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanches, K. R. B. (1998). Love, romance and other barriers to safer sex among adolescent female university students. Presented at the XII World AIDS Conference, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Shields, S. A. (1975). Functionalism, Darwinism, and the psychology of women: A study in social myth. American Psychologists, 30, 739–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha, D. M., Thompson, W. B., & Weeden, L. (1998). ''good character.” Presented at the XII World AIDS Conference, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Shumaker, S. A., & Hill, D. R. (1991). Gender differences in social support and physical health. Health Psychology, 10(2), 102–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simoni, J. M., Walters, K. L., & Nero, D. K. (2000). Safer sex among HIV+ women: The role of relationships. Sex Roles, this issue.

  • Soet, J. E., Dudley, W. N., & DiIorio, C. (1999). The effects of ethnicity and perceived power on women's sexual behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 707–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S. (1985). Sex differences in bases of power in dating relationships. Sex Roles, 12, 449–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A. J. (1994). Toward a feminist strategy for studying women's lives. In C. E. Franz & A. J. Stewart (Eds.), Women creating lives: Identities, Resilience, and Resistance. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A. J., & Chester, N. L. (1982). Sex differences in human social motives: Achievement, affiliation, and power. In A. J. Stewart (Ed.), Motivation and society. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A. J., & Lykes, M. B. (1985). Conceptualizing gender in personality theory and research. Journal of Personality, 53, 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A. J., & Rubin, Z. (1976). Power motivation in the dating couple. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 305–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swezey, T., Harris, C. K., Nantale, J., & Nakyanjo, N. (1998). Power echoes: The impact of gendered power relations on HIV/AIDS risk and risk reduction as echoed in survey responses. Presented at the XII World AIDS Conference, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Tallis, V. (1998). The psychosocial impact of HIV and pregnancy. Presented at the XII World AIDS Conference, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Tolman, D. L., & Szalacha, L. A. (1999). Dimensions of desire: Bridging qualitative and quantitative methods in a study of female adolescent sexuality. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 7–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, H. A. (1994). Gender and social support: Taking the bad with the good? Sex Roles, 30, 521–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M. (1999). Mapping gender: The multifactorial approach and the organization of gender-related attributes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 485–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umberson, D., Chen, M. D., House, J. S., Hopkins, K., & Slaten, E. (1996). The effect of social relationships on psychological well-being: Are men and women really so different? American Sociological Review, 61, 837–857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, R. K. (1996). Using the master's tools: Epistemology and empiricism. In S. Wilkinson (Ed.), Feminist social psychologies: International perspectives (pp. 165–181). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, R. K., & Sanchez-Hucles, J. (1993). Integrating culture: Implications for the psychology of women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 365–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ussher, J. M. (1993). Paradoxical practices: Psychologists as scientists in the field of AIDS. In C. Squire (Ed.), Women and AIDS: Psychological perspectives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, E., & Nastasi, B. (1998). Reducing gender-related barriers in HIV prevention efforts: Findings from ICRW's women and AIDS research program. Presented at the XII World AIDS Conference, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Westkott, M. (1979). Feminist criticism of the social sciences. Harvard Educational Review, 49, 422–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winstead, B. A., & Derlega, V. J. (1993). Gender and close relationships: An introduction.Journal of Social Issues, 49, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. G. (1992). Power motivation revisited. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 301–310). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. G., & Stewart, A. J. (1978). The power motive. In H. London & J. E. Exner, Jr. (Eds.), Dimensions of personality (pp. 391–447). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worell, J., & Etaugh, C. (1994). Transforming theory and research with women: Themes and variations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 443–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, G. E. (1994). The sociocultural relevance of sex research: Challenges for the 90s and beyond. American Psychologist, 49, 748–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, G. E., Carmona, J. V., Loeb, T. B., Guthrie, D., Chin, D., & Gordon, G. (2000).Factors affecting HIV contraceptive decision-making among women. Sex Roles, this issue.

  • Yoder, J. D., & Kahn, A. S. (1992). Toward a feminist understanding of women and power.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 381–388.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of North Texas, USA

    Sharon Rae Jenkins

Authors
  1. Sharon Rae Jenkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jenkins, S.R. Introduction to the Special Issue: Defining Gender, Relationships, and Power. Sex Roles 42, 467–493 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007010604246

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007010604246

Search

Navigation