Abstract
A significant number of respondents to contingent valuation surveys tend to either state a zero bid, or refuse to state a bid at all, for reasons associated with the process of valuation. These protest responses are routinely removed from contingent valuation samples because it is assumed that they are not indicative of respondents’ ‘true’ values. The censoring of protest responses has led to the emergence of a definitional controversy. One view is that the definition of protest responses and the rules for censoring them are dependent on whether the practitioner conceives of the contingent valuation survey as a market or as a referendum. However, what is not acknowledged is the possibility that protest responses and their meaning may vary according to the type of good being valued, the elicitation format, and the interaction between these elements and external factors. This potential renders the development of unambiguous rules for censoring protest responses difficult. Moreover, when willingness to pay is viewed as a behavioural intention, it becomes important to determine what the responses actually mean. This approach does not assume an interpretative position a priori against which the responses should be judged, but seeks to inform an existing understanding which is inadequate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aish, A. M. and K. G. Joreskog (1990), ‘A Panel Model for Political Efficacy and Responsiveness: An Application of LISREL 7 with Weighted Least Squares’, Quality and Quantity 24, 405–426.
Aitken, C. K. (1995), ‘Results of an International Benchmarking Study of Stormwater Pollution Control’, The Second International Symposium on Urban Stormwater Management 1995: Integrated Management of Urban Environments (Vol. 1). The National Committee on Water Engineering of the Institution of Engineers Australia, NCP No. 95/03.
Browne, M. W. and R. Cudeck (1993), ‘Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit’, in K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long, eds., Testing Structural Equation Models. London: Sage.
Cameron, T. A. (1988), ‘A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-market Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression’, J. Environ. Econom. Management 15, 355–379.
Cameron, T. A. and M. D. James (1987), ‘Efficient Estimation Methods for Use With “Close-ended” Contingent Valuation Survey Data’, Rev. Econom. Statistics 69, 269–276.
Castles, I. (1990), 1988–1989 Household Expenditure Survey Australia: Detailed Expenditure Items. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Catalogue No. 6535.0.
Desvousges, W. H., F. R. Johnson, R. W. Dunford, S. P. Hudson and K. N. Wilson (1993), ‘Measuring Natural Resource Damages With Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability’, in J. A. Hausman, ed., Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Edwards, S. F. and G. D. Anderson (1987), ‘Overlooked Biases in Contingent Valuation Surveys: Some Considerations’, Land Econom. 63, 168–178.
Fischoff, B. and L. Furby (1988), ‘Measuring Values: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Transactions With Special Reference to Contingent Valuation of Visibility’, J. Risk Uncertainty 1, 147–184.
Green, C. H. and S. M. Tunstall (1991), ‘Is the Economic Evaluation of Environmental Resources Possible?’, J. Environ. Management 33, 123–141.
Halstead, J. M., A. E. Luloff and T. H. Stevens (1992), ‘Protest Bidders in Contingent Valuation’, Northeastern J. of Agr. Resource Econom. 21, 160–169.
Hanemann, W. M. (1984), ‘Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments With Discrete Responses’, Amer. J. Agr. Econom. 66, 332–341.
Hanemann, W. M. (1989), ‘Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments With Discrete Response Data: Reply’, Amer. J. Agr. Econom. 71, 1057–1061.
Hoevenagel, R. and J.W. van der Linden (1993), ‘Effects of Different Descriptions of the Ecological Good on Willingness to Pay Values’, Ecol. Econom. 7, 223–238.
Joreskog, K. G. (1993), ‘Testing Structural Equation Models’, in K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long, eds., Testing Structural Equation Models. London: Sage.
Joreskog, K. G. and D. Sorbom (1993), LISREL-8 User’s Reference Guide. IL: SSI.
Jorgensen, B. S. and G. J. Syme (1995), ‘Market Models, Protest Bids, and Outliers in Contingent Valuation’, J. Water Resour. Plng. Management 121, 400–401.
Kealy, M. J. and R. W. Turner (1993), ‘A Test of the Equality of Closed-Ended and Open-Ended Contingent Valuations’, Amer. J. Agr. Econom. 75, 321–331.
Lindsey, G. (1992), ‘An Experiment in Contingent Valuation: Willingness to Pay for Stormwater Management (Doctoral dissertation, John Hopkins University, Maryland)’, University Microfilms International, No. 9216594.
Lindsey, G. (1994), ‘Market Models, Protest Bids, and Outliers in Contingent Valuation’, J. Water Resour. Plng. Management 120, 121–129.
Lindsey, G. (1995), ‘Closure’, J. Water Resour. Plng. Management 121, 401–402.
Milon, W. J. (1989), ‘Contingent Valuation Experiments for Strategic Behaviour’, J. Environ. Econom. Management 17, 293–308.
Mitchell, R. C. and R. T. Carson (1989), Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.
Nancarrow, B. E., B. S. Jorgensen and G. J. Syme (1995), Stormwater Management in Australia: Community Perceptions, Attitudes, and Knowledge. Urban Water Research Association of Australia, No. 95.
Sagoff, M. (1988), The Economy of the Earth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sellar, C., J. R. Stoll and J-P. Chavas (1985), ‘Validation of Empirical Measures of Welfare Change: A Comparison of Nonmarket Techniques’, Land Econom. 61, 156–175.
Sutherland, R. J. and R. G. Walsh (1985), ‘Effect of Distance on the Preservation of Water Quality’, Land Econom. 61, 281–291.
Syme, G. J. and B. S. Jorgensen (1994), Assessing Community Values of Capital Works in the Water Industry: Contingent Valuation and Other Techniques. Division of Water Resources Consultancy Report No. 94/24.
Tanaka, J. S. (1993). ‘Multifaceted Conceptions of Fit in Structural Equation Models’, in K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long, eds., Testing Structural Equation Models. London: Sage.
Whittington, D., V. K. Smith, A. Okorafor, A. Okore, J. Long Liu and A. McPhail (1992), ‘Giving Respondents Time to Think in Contingent Valuation Studies: A Developing Countries Application’, J. Environ. Econom. Management 22, 205–225.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jorgensen, B.S., Syme, G.J., Bishop, B.J. et al. Protest Responses in Contingent Valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics 14, 131–150 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008372522243
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008372522243