Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Group Development (I): A Review and Synthesis of Development Models

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is the first of two parts that examine the issue of group development and its impact on the study design of group support systems (GSS). We review the various models of group development, analyze the sources of differences among these models, and synthesize common themes across various models. The paper concludes with a meta-framework for understanding group development; this framework highlights the two areas of focus that have dominated group development research in the past: group processes and outcomes. The second paper will build on the ideas developed here and discuss the implications of group development for GSS research.

Previous research on group behavior suggests that groups change over time; patterns of change, referred to as group development models, have been an important area of study for the past four decades. For the first three of these decades, unitary models of group development were very popular; that is, the notion that all groups go through a certain series of predefined stages. In the last decade, however, researchers have cast doubt on such unitary models of group development. Nonsequential models that recognize the uniqueness of each group (and consequently reject the idea of a single, predetermined series of stages) have become increasingly popular. This paper examines the implications of these issues for researchers and managers of groups. It also attempts to serve as the foundation for the propositions developed in the next paper, in which the relevance of group development for GSS research and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anson, R. G. (1990). "Effects of Computer Support and Facilitation Support on Group Processes." Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.

  • Anthony, E. J. (1967). "The Generic Elements in Dyadic and in Group Psychotherapy," International Journal of Psychotherapy 17, 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction Process Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F. (1953). "The Equilibrium Problem in Small Groups," in T. Parsons, R. F. Bales, and E. A. Shils (eds.), Working Papers in the Theory of Action. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F. (1970). Personality and Interpersonal Behavior. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F., and F. L. Strodbeck. (1951). "Phases in Group Problem Solving," Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 46, 485–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. G., and H. A. Shepard, (1956). "A Theory of Group Development," Human Relations 9, 415–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in Groups, 2nd ed. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bormann, E. G. (1970). "The Paradox and Promise of Small Group Research," Speech Monographs 37, 211–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braaten, L. J. (1974). "Developmental Phases of Encounter Groups: A Critical Review of Models and a New Proposal," Interpersonal Development 75, 112–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K., and L. Chidambaram, (1994). "Developmental Differences between Distributed and Face-to-Face Groups in Electronically Supported Meeting Environments: An Exploratory Investigation," Group Decision and Negotiation.

  • Campbell, D. J. (1988). "Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis," Academy of Management Review 13(1), 40–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chidambaram, L. (1989). "An Empirical Investigation of the Impact of Computer Support on Group Development and Decision Making Performance." Unpublished doctoral disseration, Indiana University.

  • Chidambaram, L., and R. P. Bostrom. (1993). "Evolution of Group Performance over Time: A Repeated Measures Study of GDSS Effects," Journal of Organizational Computing 3(4), 443–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, R. H. (1978). Mastering Medicine: Professional Socialization in Medical School. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A. R., and B. R. Gallupe, (1993). "A History of Group Support Systems Empirical Research: Lessons Learned and Future Directions." In L. M. Jessup and J. S. Valacich (eds.), Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, pp. 59-77. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, G., and B. R. Gallupe. (1985). "Group Decision Support Systems: A New Frontier," Database 16(2), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, G., and M. S. Poole. (1991). "The Hidden Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory." University of Minnesota working paper.

  • Dunphy, D. C. (1964). "Social Changes in Self-analytic Groups." Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.

  • Dunphy, D. C. (1974). "The Function of Fantasy in Groups," in G. S. Gibbard, J. J. Hartman, and R. D. Mann (eds.), Analysis of Groups. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. R., and K. L. Dion. (1991). "Group Cohesion and Performance: A Meta-Analysis," Small Group Research 22, 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. P. (1976). "Patterns in the Development of Self-Analytic Groups," Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 12, 523–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallupe, R. B. (1985). "The Impact of Task Difficulty on the Use of a Group Decision Support System." Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

  • Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). "Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development," Academy of Management Journal 31(1), 9–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C. J. G. (1989). "Marking Time: Predictable Transitions in Task Groups," Academy of Management Journal 32(2), 274–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C. J. G. (1991). "Revolutionary Change Theories: A Multi-Level Exploration of the Punctuated Equilibrium Paradigm," Academy of Management Review 16(1), 10–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, G. S., J. J. Hartman, and R. D. Mann. (1974). Analysis of Groups. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginnet, R. C. (1990). "The Airline Cockpit Crew," in J. R. Hackman (ed.), Groups That Work (and Those That Don't): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork. Jossey-Bass. San Francisco: CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, A. (1991). "The Effects of Technology Level and Task Type on Group Outcomes in a Group Decision Support System Environment." Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia.

  • Gopal, A., R. P. Bostrom, and W. W. Chin. (1992–93). "Applying Adaptive Structuration Theory to Investigate the Process of Group Support System Use," Journal of Management Information Systems 9(3), 45–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, R. J., and N. Vidmar. (1970). "Effects of Size and Task Type on Group Performance and Member Reactions," Sociometry 33(1), 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., and R. A. D'aveni. (1992). "Top Team Deterioration as Part of the Downward Spiral of Large Corporate Bankruptcies," Management Science 38(10), 1445–1466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, A. P. (1973). "Theories of Group Development and Categories for Interaction Analysis," Small Group Behavior 4(3), 259–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinen, J. S. (1971). "The Development of Work Teams in a Complex Organization," Unpublished dissertation, Michigan State University.

  • Heinicke, C. M., and R. F. Bales. (1953). "Developmental Trends in the Structure of Small Groups," Sociometry 16, 7–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, W. F., and L. Gruner. (1973). "A Study of Development in Open and Closed Groups," Small Group Behavior 4, 355–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. R. (1959). "Personality Growth in Psychiatric Residence," AMA Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 81, 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, E. (1956). "The Growth of Groups in a Voluntary Organization," Journal of Social Issues 12(2), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. (1982). Victims of Groupthink 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S., and M. Roman. (1963). "Phases of Development in an Adult Therapy Group," International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 13, 10–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. (1982). "The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance," Administrative Science Quarterly 27, 81–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayser, T. A. (1990). Mining Group Gold: How to Cash in on the Collaborative Brain Power of a Group. El Segundo, CA: Serif Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. R., and J. E. McGrath. (1988). On Time and Method. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kormanski, C., and A. Mozenter. (1987). "A New Model of Team Building: A Technology for Today and Tomorrow," Developing Human Resources.

  • LaCoursiere, R. (1974). "A Group Method to Facilitate Learning during the Stages of a Psychiatric Affiliation," International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 24, 342–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. D. (1975). "Winners, Losers and the Search for Equality in Groups," in C. L. Cooper (ed.), Theories of Group Processes. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. D., G. S. Gibbard, and J. J. Hartman. (1967). Interpersonal Styles and Group Development. NewYork: Wiley.

  • McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E. (1991). "Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP): A Theory of Groups." Small Group Research 22(2), 147–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E., and J. R. Kelly. (1986). Time and Human Interaction: Toward a Social Psychology of Time. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennecke, B. E., and B. C. Wheeler. (1992). "Tasks Matter: Modeling Group Task Processes in Experimental CSCW Research," Indiana University working paper.

  • Mills, T. M. (1964). Group Transformation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, T. M. (1967). The Sociology of Small Groups. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunamaker, J. F., Jr., A. R. Dennis, J. S. Valacich, D. R. Vogel, and J. F. George. (1991). "Electronic Meeting Systems to Support GroupWork: Theory and Practice at Arizona," Communications of the ACM 34(7), 40–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1961). "An Outline of the Social System," in T. Parsons et al. (eds.), Theories of Society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M. S., and G. DeSanctis. (1989). "Use of Group Decision Support Systems as an Appropriation Process," Proceedings of the Twenty-second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 3, 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M. S., and G. DeSanctis. (1990). "Understanding the Use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration," in J. Fulk, and C. Steinfield (eds.), Organizations and Communication Technology, pp. 173-193. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M. S., and R. Lind. (1991). "The Process of Using Group Decision Support Systems as a Key Influence on Communication Processes and Outcomes," International Communication Association Conference.

  • Putnam, L. L. (1986). "Conflict in Group Decision Making," in R. Y. Hirokawa, and M. S. Poole (eds.), Communication and Decision Making. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, A., and H. Marx. (1974). "Expectations versus Perceptions of a FirstYear Law Class," Journal of Legal Education 26, 349–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroder, H. M., and O. J. Harvey. (1963). "Conceptual Organization and Group Structure," in O. J. Harvey (ed.), Motivation and Social Interaction. New York: Ronald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, W. C. (1958). FIRO: A Three-Dimensional Theory of Interpersonal Behavior. New York: Holt Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seashore, S. E. (1954). Group Cohesiveness in the Industrial Work Group. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. E. (1981). Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, P. E. (1966). Microcosm: Structural, Psychological and Religious Evolution in Groups. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitz, H., and B. J. Sadock. (1973). "Small Interactional Groups in the Psychiatric Training of Graduate Nursing Students," Journal of Nursing Education 12, 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, D., and H. A. Thelen. (1958). Emotional Dynamics and Group Culture: Experimental Studies of Individual and Group Behavior. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, H. A. (1954). Dynamics of Groups at Work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, H. A. (1956). "Emotionality andWork in Groups," in L. D. White (ed.), The State of the Social Sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. W. (1965). "Developmental Sequence in Small Groups," Psychological Bulletin 63, 384–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalom, I. D. (1975). The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy, 2nd ed. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. T. (1987). "A Study of Group Decision Support System Use in Three and Four Person Groups for a Preference Allocation Decision." Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

  • Zigurs, I. (1987). "The Effect of Computer-Based Support on Influence Attempts and Patterns in Small Group Decision-Making." Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Business Administration, University of Hawaii, 2404 Maile Way, Honolulu, Hawaii, 96822

    Laku Chidambaram

  2. College of Business Administration, Brooks Hall, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602

    Robert Bostrom

Authors
  1. Laku Chidambaram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Bostrom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chidambaram, L., Bostrom, R. Group Development (I): A Review and Synthesis of Development Models. Group Decision and Negotiation 6, 159–187 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008603328241

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008603328241

Search

Navigation