Skip to main content
Log in

The significance of prognosis for a theory of medical practice

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A typical problem of modern medicine results from the gap between scientific knowledge and its application in individual cases. Whereas scientific knowledge is generalized and impersonal information, medical practice takes place under conditions which are singular, individual and irreversible. The paper examines whether prognosis is able to bridge this gap or “hiatus theoreticus.” It is shown that diagnosis of a single case always relies on prognostic considerations. The individual prognosis (as distinguished from the nosologic prognosis of a certain disease) enables doctors to apply scientific knowledge and practice according to the actual situation, the history and personal preferences of the patient. Prognosis – not diagnosis – therefore legitimizes medical interference. A methodology of individual prognosis as the basis for a theory of practice is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiesemann, C. The significance of prognosis for a theory of medical practice. Theor Med Bioeth 19, 253–261 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009913915839

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009913915839

Navigation