Abstract
Mismatch between college students' work goals and perceived goal affordances of physical/mathematical science careers may help explain gender differences in interest and career choice. In Study 1, the desire for interesting work was cited by most students in the sample (89% White, 6% Asian, 5% other). Compared to men, women reported interpersonal work goals more and high pay and status work goals less frequently. In Study 2, students (79% White, 12% Latino, 5% Asian, 4% other, predominantly middle class) perceived physical/mathematical science careers as less likely to afford interpersonal goals and more likely to afford high pay and status goals compared to other careers. Interpersonal goal affordances predicted greater interestingness for all careers, whereas high pay and status goal affordances predicted greater interestingness only for physical/mathematical sciences. Interestingness positively predicted likelihood of career choice.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Alper, J. (1993). The pipeline is leaking women all the way along. Science, 260, 409–411.
American Association of UniversityWomen. (1992). How schools shortchange girls: A study of major findings of girls and education. Washington, DC: Author.
Bae, Y., & Smith, T. M. (1996). Issues in focus:Women in mathematics and science. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, N J: Prentice-Hall.
Bar-Haim, G., & Wilkes, J. M. (1989). A cognitive interpretation of the marginality and under-representation of women in science. Journal of Higher Education, 60, 371–387.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
Beggs, J. M., & Doolittle, D. C. (1993). Perceptions now and then of occupational gender typing: Areplication of Shinar's 1975 study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1435–1453.
Betz, N., & Hackett, G. (1981). The relationship of career-related self-efficacy expectations to perceived career options in college women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 399–410.
Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1986). Applications of self-efficacy theory to understanding career choice behavior. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 279–289.
Cantor, N., & Kihlstrom, J. (1987). Personality and social intelligence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Catsambis, S. (1995). Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in the middle grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 243–257.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 815–822.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination inhumanbehavior. New York: Plenum.
Dick, T. P., & Rallis, S. F. (1991). Factors and influences on high school students' career choices. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 281–292.
Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women's educational and occupational choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609.
Glick, P., Wilk, K., & Perreault, M. (1995). Images of occupations: Components of gender and status in occupational stereotypes. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 32, 565–582.
Harackiewicz, J. M., & Sansone, C. (1991). Goals and intrinsic motivation: You can get there from here. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 7, 21–49.
Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139–155.
Isaac, J., Sansone, C., & Smith, J. (1999). Other people as sources of interest in an activity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 239–265.
Jacobs, J. E., Finken, L. L., Griffin, N. L., & Wright, J. D. (1998). The career plans of science-talented rural adolescent girls. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 681–704.
Kelly, K. R. (1993). The relation of gender and academic achievement to career self-efficacy and interests. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 59–64.
Kruglanski, A.W. (1975). The endogenous-exogenous partition in attribution theory. Psychological Review, 82, 387–406.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.
Lent, R. W., Lopez, F. G., & Bieschke, K. J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 424–430.
Lips, H. M. (1992). Gender-and science-related attitudes as predictors of college students' academic choices. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 62–81.
Lopez, F.G., & Lent, R.W. (1992). Sources of mathematics self-efficacy in high school students. Career Development Quarterly, 41, 3–12.
Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1992). Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted: Implications for the Math-Science pipeline. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 61–66.
Matheson, K., & Strickland, L. (1986). The stereotype of the computer scientist. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 18, 15–24.
McAdams, D. P. (1989). Intimacy: The need to be close. New York: Doubleday.
McLean, H. M., & Kalin, R. (1994). Congruence between self-image and occupational stereotypes in students entering gender-dominated occupations. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 26, 142–162.
Morgan, C., & Sansone, C. (1995). Achievement and interpersonal concerns in everyday problems: Gender differences and similarities. Unpublished manuscript.
Murray, H. A., (1938). Explorations of personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Poole, M., Langan-Fox, J., & Omodei, M. (1990). Determining career orientations in women from different social class backgrounds. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 23, 471–490.
Rowe, R., & Snizek, W. E. (1995). Gender differences in work values: Perpetuating the myth. Work and Occupations, 22, 215–229.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.
Sansone, C. (1986). A question of competence: The effects of competence and task feedback on intrinsic interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 918–931.
Sansone, C., & Berg, C. (1993). Adapting to the environment across the lifespan: Different process or different inputs? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 16, 215–241.
Sansone, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). “I don't feel like it”: The function of interest in self-regulation. In L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions between goals and affect (pp. 203–228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sansone, C., & Morgan, C. (1992). Intrinsic motivation and education: Competence in context. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 249–270.
Sansone, C., Morgan, C., & Smith, J. L. (1999). [The effects of match between interpersonal work goals and interpersonal purpose goals on interest]. Unpublished data.
Sansone, C., Sachau, D., & Weir, C. (1989). The effects of instruction on intrinsic interest: The importance of context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 818–829.
Sansone, C., & Smith, J. L. (2000). Interest and self-regulation: The relation between having to and wanting to. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 341–372). San Diego: Academic Press.
Seymour, E. (1995). The loss of women from science, mathematics, and engineering undergraduate majors: An explanatory account. Science Education, 79, 437–473.
Smith, J. L., Morgan, C., & Sansone, C. (in press). Getting (inter)personal: The role of other people in the self-regulation of interest. Advances in Psychology, Vol. 5. NewYork: NOVA Science Publishers, Inc.
Smith, J. L., Ruiz, J. M., & Isaac, J. D. (1999). Interpersonal orientation: A descriptive profile. Manuscript in preparation.
Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 501–524.
Strough, J., Berg, C. A., & Sansone, C. (1996). Goals for solving everyday problems across the lifespan: Age and gender differences in the salience of interpersonal concerns. Developmental Psychology, 32, 1106–1115.
Stumpf, H., & Stanley, J. (1996). Gender related differences on the College Board's Advanced Placement and Achievement tests, 1982–1992. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 353–364.
White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.
Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 117–142.
Yoder, J. D., & Scheicher, T. L. (1996). Undergraduates regard deviation from occupational gender stereotypes as costly for women. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 34, 171–188.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morgan, C., Isaac, J.D. & Sansone, C. The Role of Interest in Understanding the Career Choices of Female and Male College Students. Sex Roles 44, 295–320 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010929600004
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010929600004