Skip to main content
Log in

Incremental Validity of Perceived Control Dimensions in the Differential Prediction of Interpretive Biases for Threat

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study evaluated whether a diminished perception of control over environmental and interoceptive events differentially predicted interpretive biases for threat for ambiguous scenarios. The sample had 95 participants without a history of psychopathology. Results indicated that the internal dimension of the Anxiety Control Questionnaire (ACQ; R. M. Rapee, M. G. Craske, T. A. Brown, & D. H. Barlow, 1996) was predictive of interpretive biases for internal scenarios above and beyond demographic variables, subclinical panic attack history, and state anxiety; the external control subscale of the ACQ also was predictive of internal rank-ordered responses. The ACQ external dimension was predictive of interpretive responses for external scenarios beyond the effects accounted for by the other predictor variables, including perceived control for internal events. These findings provide initial correlational evidence consistent with cognitive–behavioral accounts of panic disorder that posit a perceived lack of control over aversive events may exacerbate an interpretive bias for threat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Amir, N., Foa, E. B., & Coles, M. E. (1998). Negative interpretive bias in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 945–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D. H. (1991). Disorders of emotion. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 58–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D. H. (1988). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D. H., Chorpita, B. F., & Turovsky, J. (1996). Fear, panic, anxiety, and disorders of emotion. In D. Hope (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 43, pp. 251–328). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A. (1994). Familial aggregation of panic in nonclinical panickers. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 233–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A., & Deagle, E. A. (1992). Structured interview assessment of nonclinical panic. Behavior Therapy, 23, 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chorpita, B. F., & Barlow, D. H. (1998). The development of anxiety: The role of control in the early environment. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. Heimberg, M. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment and treatment. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. M., Salkovskis, P. M., Breitholz, E., Westling, B. E., Ost, L. G., Koehler, K. A., Jeavons, A., & Gelder, M. G. (1997). Misinterpretation of body sensations in panic disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 203–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constans, J. I., Penn, D. L., Ihen, G. H., & Hope, D. A. (1999). Interpretive biases for ambiguous stimuli in social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 643–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B. J., Endler, N. S., & Swinson, R. P. (1991). Clinical and nonclinical panic attacks: An empirical test of the panic-anxiety continuum. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 5, 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B. J., Endler, N. S., Swinson, R. P., & Norton, G. R. (1992). Situations and specific coping strategies associated with clinical and nonclinical panic attacks. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 67–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craske, M. G. (1991). Phobic fear and panic attacks: The same emotional states triggered by different cues? Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 599–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eifert, G. H., Forsyth, J. P., Zvolensky, M. J., & Lejuez, C. W. (1999). Moving from the laboratory to the real world and back again: Increasing the relevance of laboratory examinations of anxiety sensitivity. Behavior Therapy, 30, 275–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldner, M. T., & Hekmat, H. (2000). Predictors of pain behaviors in a cold pressor task. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Forsyth, J. P., & Eifert, G. H. (1998). Intensity of systemic alarms in content-specific fear conditioning: Comparing 20% versus 13% CO2-enriched air as a UCS. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1990). Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 269–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. M., Richards, J. C., Dziadosz, T., & Swindell, A. (1993). Misinterpretation of ambiguous stimuli in panic disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 17, 235–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follete, V., & Strosahl, K. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: a functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Smith, C. A. (1988). Knowledge and appraisal in the cognition-emotion relationship. Cognition and Emotion, 2, 281–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lejuez, C.W., Eifert, G. H., Zvolensky, M. J., & Richards, J. B. (in press). Preference between predictable and unpredictable administrations of 20% carbon dioxide-enriched air: Implications for understanding the etiology of panic disorder. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied.

  • MacLeod, C., & Cohen, I. L. (1993). Anxiety and the interpretation of ambiguity: A text comprehension study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 238–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1991). Cognitive-experimental approaches to the emotional disorders. In P. Martin (Ed.), Handbook of behavior therapy and psychological science: An integrative approach (pp. 116–150). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., Richards, A., & Eysenck, M. W. (1989). The interpretation of homophones related to threat in anxiety states. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J. (1996). Cognitive bias in the anxiety disorders. In D. Hope (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 43, pp. 211–250). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J. (1998). Information-processing abnormalities in anxiety disorders: Implications for cognitive neuroscience. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 479–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J., & Foa, E. B. (1987). Cognition and agoraphobia: Bias in the interpretation of threat. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 567–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J., Hornig, C. D., Hoffman, E. C., & Han, E. M. (1999). Anxiety sensitivity and cognitive biases for threat. Behavior Therapy, 30, 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mineka, S., & Kelly, K. (1989). The relationship between anxiety, lack of control, and loss of control. In A. Steptoe & A. Appels (Eds.), Stress, personal control, and worker health. Brussels: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mineka, S., & Zinbarg, R. (1996). Conditioning and ethological models of anxiety disorders: Stress-in-dynamic context anxiety models. In D. Hope (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 135–210 ). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muris, P., van Zuuren, F. J., & de Vries, S. (1994). Monitoring, blunting, and situational anxiety: A laboratory study on coping with a quasimedical stressor. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 365–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D. L., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., & Silva, P. A. (1998). Comorbid mental disorders: Implications for treatment and sample selection. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 305–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, G. R., Pidlubny, S. R., & Norton, P. J. (1999). The use of nonclinical panickers to test a prediction. Behavior Therapy, 30, 321- 332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A., & Reiss, S. (1992). Anxiety Sensitivity Index Manual (2nd ed.). Worthington, OH: International Diagnostic Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapee, R. M., Craske, M. G., Brown, T. A., & Barlow, D. H. (1996). Measurement of perceived control over anxiety-related events. Behavior Therapy, 27, 279–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, A., & French, C. C. (1992). An anxiety-related bias in semantic activation when processing threat/neutral homographs. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 503–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallis, J. F., Lichstein, K. L., & McGlynn, F. D. (1980). Anxiety response patterns: A comparison of clinical and analogue populations. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 11, 179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoler, L. S., & McNally, R. J. (1991). Cognitive bias in symptomatic and recovered agoraphobics. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29, 539–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopa, L., & Clark, D. M. (2000). Social phobia and interpretation of social events. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 273–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpe, J. (1958). Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zebb, B. J., & Moore, M. C. (1999). Another look at the psychometric properties of the anxiety control questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 18, 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zvolensky, M. J., Eifert, G. H., Lejuez, C. W., & McNeil, D. W. (1999). The effects of offset control over 20% carbon dioxide-enriched air on anxious responding. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 624–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zvolensky, M. J., Lejuez, C. W., & Eifert, G. H. (2000). Prediction and control: Operational definitions for the experimental analysis of anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 653–663.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zvolensky, M.J., Heffner, M., Eifert, G.H. et al. Incremental Validity of Perceived Control Dimensions in the Differential Prediction of Interpretive Biases for Threat. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 23, 75–83 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010935407194

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010935407194

Navigation