Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal Design of a Population Pharmacodynamic Experiment for Ivabradine

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. To design a parsimonious population pharmacodynamic experiment that has the same or greater efficiency than that provided by two phase I studies.

Methods. The design was based on optimization of the population Fisher information matrix. Options for optimization were (1) determination of the optimal sampling times for each group (“group” represents a group of subjects that have identical design characteristics), (2) determination of the optimal doses for each group, and (3) determination of the optimal group structure.

Results. (1) Optimizing the sampling times, while retaining only four unique times per group, provided a more parsimonious experiment with the same efficiency as the original “study” that involved on average 10 samples per subject. Splitting sampling times between the first dose and a steady-state dose gave the most informative design. (2) The optimal dose was the same in all groups and was the upper bound of the dose range. (3) The optimal population design consisted of only one group with four unique sampling times that are the same for all subjects.

Conclusion. A population pharmacodynamic trial design is presented that is more parsimonious than the original study and would be appropriate for inclusion in a premarketing clinical study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. I. Ragueneau, C. Laveille, R. Jochemsen, G. Resplandy, C. Funck-Bretano, and P. Jaillon. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the effects of ivabradine, a direct sinus node inhibitor, on heart rate in healthy volunteers. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 64:192-203 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Duffull, S. Chabaud, P. Nony, C. Laveille, P. Girard, and L. Aarons. A pharmacokinetic simulation model for ivabradine. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 10:285-294 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. B. Duffull and L. Aarons. Development of a sequential linked pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic simulation model for ivabradine in healthy volunteers. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 10:275-284 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Mentré, A. Mallet, and D. Baccar. Optimal design in random-effects regression models. Biometrika 84:429-442 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Tod, F. Mentré, Y. Merlé, and A. Mallet. Robust optimal design for the estimation of hyperparameters in population pharmacokinetics. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 26:689-716 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Jones, J. Wang, P. Jarvis, and W. Byrom. Design of cross-over trials for pharmacokinetic studies. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 78:307-316 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. V. Fedorov. Theory of Optimal Experiments, Academic Press, London, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  8. É. Walter and L. Pronzato. Identification of Parametric Models from Experimental Data, Springer, Paris, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. F. Cosson and E. L. Fuseau. Mixed effect modeling of sumatriptan pharmacokinetics during drug development: II. From healthy subjects to phase 2 dose ranging in patients. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 27:149-171 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. M. Landaw. Optimal multicompartmental sampling designs for parameter estimation: practical aspects of the identification problem. Math. Comput. Sim. 14:525-530 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Z. D'Argenio. Optimal sampling times for pharmacokinetic experiments. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 9:739-756 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Z. D'Argenio. Incorporating prior parameter uncertainty in the design of sampling schedules for pharmacokinetic parameter estimation experiments. Math. Biosci. 99:105-118 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Retout, S. B. Duffull, and F. Mentré. Development and implementation of the population Fisher information matrix for evaluation of population pharmacokinetic designs. Comp. Meth. Prog. Biomed. (2000), in press.

  14. M. Tod and J. M. Rocchisani. Implementation of OSPOP, an algorithm for the estimation of optimal sampling times in pharmacokinetics by the ED, EID and API criteria. Comp. Meth. Prog. Biomed. 50:13-22 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Hashimoto and L. B. Sheiner. Designs for population pharmacodynamics: Value of pharmacokinetic data and population analysis. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 19:333-353 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. Endrenyi. Design of experiments for estimating enzyme and pharmacokinetic parameters. In L. Endrenyi (ed.), Kinetic Data Analysis. Design and Analysis of Enzyme and Pharmacokinetic Experiments, Plenum, New York, 1981, pp. 137-167.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. I. Ette, A. W. Kelman, A. C. Howie, and B. Whiting. Interpretation of simulation studies for efficient estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters. Ann. Pharmacother. 27:1034-1039 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vrijens B. and Goetghebeur E. Irregular drug intake reduces bias and improves precision in PK/PD population studies. University of Ghent, Center for Statistics, Technical Report 2000/1 (2000).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duffull, S.B., Mentré, F. & Aarons, L. Optimal Design of a Population Pharmacodynamic Experiment for Ivabradine. Pharm Res 18, 83–89 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011035028755

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011035028755

Navigation