Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of a Microemulsion Vehicle on Cutaneous Bioequivalence of a Lipophilic Model Drug Assessed by Microdialysis and Pharmacodynamics

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. The aim of the study was to investigate the cutaneous bioequivalence of a lipophilic model drug (lidocaine) applied in a novel topical microemulsion vehicle, compared to a conventional oil–in–water (O/W) emulsion, assessed by a pharmacokinetics microdialysis model and a pharmacodynamic method.

Methods. Dermal delivery of lidocaine was estimated by microdialysis in 8 volunteers. Absorption coefficients and lag times were determined by pharmacokinetic modelling of the microdialysis data. Subsequently, the anaesthetic effect of the treatments was assessed by mechanical stimuli using von Frey hairs in 12 volunteers.

Results. The microemulsion formulation increased the cutaneous absorption coefficient of lidocaine 2.9 times (95% confidence interval: 1.9/4.6) compared with the O/W emulsion–based cream. Also, lag time decreased from 110 ± 43 min to 87 ± 32 min (P = 0.02). The compartmental pharmacokinetic model provided an excellent fit of the concentration–time curves with reliable estimation of absorption coefficient and lag time. A significant anaesthetic effect was found for both active treatments compared to placebo (P < 0.02), but the effect did not diverge significantly between the two formulations.

Conclusions. The microemulsion vehicle can be applied to increase dermal drug delivery of lipophilic drugs in humans. The microdialysis technique combined with an appropriate pharmacokinetic model provides a high sensitivity in bioequivalence studies of topically applied substances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. T. P. Hoar and J. H. Schulman. Transparent water in oil dispersions: Oleopathic hydromicelle. Nature 152:102 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Kreilgaard. Cutaneous drug delivery potential of microemulsion vehicles—Application of a pharmacokinetic microdialysis model to assess skin penetration. [Ph.D. thesis]. The Royal Danish School of Pharmacy, Copenhagen, Denmark. (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Kreilgaard, E. J. Pedersen, and J. W. Jaroszewski. NMR characterisation and transdermal drug delivery potential of microemulsion systems. J. Control. Release 69:421–433 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Kreilgaard. Dermal pharmacokinetics of microemulsion formulations determined by in vivo microdialysis. Pharm. Res. 18:367–374 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Boltri, S. Morel, M. Trotta, and M. R. Gasco. In vitro transdermal permeation of nifedipine from thickened microemulsions. J. Pharm. Belg. 49:315–320 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. Kriwet and C. C. Müller–Goymann. Diclofenac release from phospholipid drug systems and permeation through excised human stratum corneum. Int. J. Pharm. 125:231–242 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. P. Bonina, L. Montenegro, N. Scrofani, E. Esposito, R. Cortesi, E. Menegatti, and C. Nastruzzi. Effects of phospholipid based formulations on in vitro and in vivo percutaneous absorption of methyl nicotinate. J. Control. Release 34:53–63 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. B. Delgado–Charro, G. Iglesias–Vilas, J. Blanco–Mendez, M. A. López–Quintela, and R. H. Guy. Delivery of a hydrophilic solute through the skin from novel microemulsion systems. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 43:37–42 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Dreher, P. Walde, P. Walther, and E. Wehrli. Interaction of a lecithin microemulsion gel with human stratum corneum and its effect on transdermal transport. J. Control. Release 45:131–140 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  10. U. Schmalfuss, R. Neubert, and W. Wohlrab. Modification of drug penetration into human skin using microemulsions. J. Control. Release 46:279–285 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Hegemann, C. Forstinger, B. Partsch, I. Lagler, and K. Wolff. Microdialysis in cutaneous pharmacology: Kinetic analysis of transdermally delivered nicotine. J. Invest. Dermatol. 104:839–843 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Müller, H. Mascher, C. Kikuta, S. Schafer, M. Brunner, G. Dorner, and H. G. Eichler. Diclofenac concentrations in defined tissue layers after topical administration. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 62:293–299 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. Benfeldt, J. Serup, and T. Menne. Effect of barrier perturbation on cutaneous salicylic acid penetration in human skin: In vivo pharmacokinetics using microdialysis and non–invasive quantification of barrier function. Br. J. Dermatol. 140:739–748 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Matsuyama, M. Nakashima, M. Ichikawa, T. Yano, S. Satoh, and S. Goto. In vivo microdialysis for the transdermal absorption of valproate in rats. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 17:1395–1398 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Nakashima, M. F. Zhao, H. Ohya, M. Sakurai, H. Sasaki, K. Matsuyama, and M. Ichikawa. Evaluation of in vivo transdermal absorption of cyclosporin with absorption enhancer using intradermal microdialysis in rats. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 48:1143–1146 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. M. Ault, C. M. Riley, N. M. Meltzer, and C. E. Lunte. Dermal microdialysis sampling in vivo. Pharm. Res. 11:1631–1639 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Schaefer and T. E. Redelmeier. Skin Barrier: Principles of Percutaneous Absorption, Karger, Basel, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Anderson, T. Andersson, and K. Wardell. Changes in skin circulation after insertion of a microdialysis probe visualized by laser Doppler perfusion imaging. J. Invest. Dermatol. 102:807–811 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. Groth and J. Serup. Cutaneous microdialysis in man: Effects of needle insertion trauma and anaesthesia on skin perfusion, erythema and skin thickness. Acta Derm. Venereol. 78:5–9 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. L. Wong, Y. Wang, and R. J. Sawchuk. Analysis of zidovudine distribution to specific regions in rabbit brain using microdialysis. Pharm. Res. 9:332–338 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. von Frey. Untersuchungen über die Sinnesfunctionen der menschilichen Haut: Druckempfindung und Schmerz. Abhl. sächs. Gesell. Wiss. math.–phys. 23:175–266 (1896).

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. P. Barker and N. Rutter. Lignocaine ointment and local anaesthesia in preterm infants. Arch. Dis. Child 72:F203–F204 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Müller, R. Schmid, O. Wagner, B. Osten, H. Shayganfar, and H. G. Eichler. In vivo characterization of transdermal drug transport by microdialysis. J. Control. Release 37:49–57 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  24. E. Benfeldt. In vivo microdialysis for the investigation of drug levels in the dermis and the effect of barrier perturbation on cutaneous drug penetration—Studies in hairless rats and human subjects. Acta Derm. Venereol. Suppl. 206:7–54 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. H. de Jong and R. A. Nace. Nerve impulse conduction during intravenous lidocaine injection. Anesthesiology 29:22–28 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. van Hees and J. Gybels. C nociceptor activity in human nerve during painful and non painful skin stimulation. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 44:600–607 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kreilgaard, M., Kemme, M.J.B., Burggraaf, J. et al. Influence of a Microemulsion Vehicle on Cutaneous Bioequivalence of a Lipophilic Model Drug Assessed by Microdialysis and Pharmacodynamics. Pharm Res 18, 593–599 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011068907416

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011068907416

Navigation