Skip to main content
Log in

Consumer Preferences for Food Irradiation: How Favorable and Unfavorable Descriptions Affect Preferences for Irradiated Pork in Experimental Auctions

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experimental auctions were used to examine the effects of alternative descriptions of food irradiation on willingness-to-pay for a pork sandwich irradiated to control Trichinella. As expected, a favorable description of irradiation increased willingness-to-pay, and an unfavorable description decreased willingness-to-pay. Notably, when subjects were given both the pro- and anti-irradiation descriptions, the negative description dominated and willingness-to-pay decreased. This was true even though the source of the negative information was identified as being a consumer advocacy group and the information itself was written in a manner that was non-scientific. If this is a widespread phenomenon, the process provides those who make inaccurate claims about new technologies a greater incentive than would otherwise be the case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Council on Science and Health. (1988). Food Irradiation: A Brief Overview (3rd ed.). New York.

  • Bergstrom, J. C., J. R. Stoll, and A. Randall. (1990). “The Impact of Information on Environmental Commodity Valuation Decisions,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72, 614-621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, K. J. (1989). “Commodity Speci.cation and the Framing of Contingent Valuation Questions,” Land Economics 65, 57-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. J. and L. F. Schrader. (1990). “Cholesterol Information and Shell Egg Consumption,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72, 548-555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, C. M. (1995). “Consumer Attitudes and Market Response to Irradiated Food,” Journal of Food Protection 58, 175-l81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST). (1986). Ionizing Energy in Food Processing and Pest Control: I. Wholesomeness of Food Treated with Ionizing Energy. Ames, IA.

  • Food and Water, Incorporated. (undated). Answers to Questions about Food Irradiution. Marshfield, VT.

  • Fox, C. R. and A. Tversky. (1995), “Ambiguity Aversion and Comparative Ignorance,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 585-603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S., J. F. Shogren, D. J. Hayes, and J. B. Kliebenstein. (1998). “CVM-X: Calibrating Contingent Valuation with Experimental Auction Markets,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80, 455-465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D. J., J. F. Shogren, S. Y. Shin, and J. B. Kliebenstein. (1995). “Valuing Food Safety in Experimental Auction Markets,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77, 40-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoevenagel, R. and J. W. van der Linden. (1993). “Effects of Different Descriptions of the Ecological Good on Willingness to Pay Values,” Ecological Economics 7, 223-238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica 47, 263-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (1989). “Food Neophobia: Major Causes and Treatments,” Food Technology 43, 62-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • List, J. and J. F. Shogren. (1999). “Price Information and Bidding Behavior in Repeated Second-Price Auctions,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81, 942-949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, B. E., W. E. Huffman, J. F. Shogren, and J. A. Fox. (1996). “Consumer Preferences for Fresh Food Items with Multiple Quality Attributes: Evidence from an Experimental Auction of Pork Chops,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78, 916-923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosen, J., D. A. Hennessy, J. A. Fox, and A. Schreiber. (1998). “Consumers' Valuation of Insecticide Use Restrictions: An Application to Apples,” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 23, 367-384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samples, K. C., J. A. Dixon, and M. M. Gowen. (1986). “Information Disclosure and Endangered Species Valuation,” Land Economics 62, 306-312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, W. and R. Zeckhauser. (1988). “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1, 7-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, H. G., C. M. Bruhn, and K. V. Diaz-Knauf. (1989). “Consumer Attitude Toward Irradiated Foods: Effects of Labeling and Benefits Information,” Food Technology 43, 80-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shogren, J. F., S. Y. Shin, D. J. Hayes, and J. B. Kliebenstein. (1994). “Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept,” American Economic Review 84, 255-270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. E., E. O. van Ravenswaay, and S. R. Thompson. (1988). “Sales Loss Determination in Food Contamination Incidents: An Application to Milk Bans in Hawaii,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70, 513-520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, D. G. and I. E. Strand. (1981). “Avoidance Costs Associated with Imperfect Information: The Case of Kepone,” Land Economics 57, 139-150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. (1980). “Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1, 39-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (1999). Final Rule on Meat and Poultry Irradiation. Food Safety and Inspection Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey, W. (1961). “Counterspeculation, Auctions and Competitive Sealed Tenders,” Journal of Finance 16, 8-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K. (1997). “Alarmist Decisions with Divergent Risk Information,” Economic Journal 107, 1657-1670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K., W. A. Magat, and J. Huber. (1987). “An Investigation of the Rationality of Consumer Valuations of Multiple Health Risks,” RAND Journal of Economics 18, 465-479.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fox, J.A., Hayes, D.J. & Shogren, J.F. Consumer Preferences for Food Irradiation: How Favorable and Unfavorable Descriptions Affect Preferences for Irradiated Pork in Experimental Auctions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 24, 75–95 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013229427237

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013229427237

Navigation