Abstract
This study examined possible gender bias in personality disorder criteria by considering a number of potential empirical indicators of bias: prevalence differences in a nonclinical sample; the implications of gender differences as perceived by nonprofessionals; the internal consistency of criteria as a function of gender; and the gender-normativeness of criteria. One hundred one participants familiar with the DSM-IV completed questionnaires assessing the presence of each criterion, and the perceived implications of the criteria for men and women. Results showed that the global mean self-rating for the criteria did not differ as a function of gender although there were some differences for individual criteria. Criteria that were more prevalent in one gender appeared to be viewed as a greater problem for that gender. The criteria also appeared to be measuring abnormal rather than gender-normative behaviors. Twelve criteria demonstrated differential convergence with other indicators of disorder as a function of gender, with most converging better for men than for women.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (Rev. 4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Broverman, I., Broverman, D., Clarkson, F., Rosenkrantz, P., &; Vogel, S. (1970). Sex role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34, 1–7.
Cleary, T. A., Humphreys, L. G., Kendrick, S. A., &; Wesman, A. (1975). Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged students. American Psychologist, 30, 15–41.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Erlbaum.
Corbitt, E. M., &; Widiger, T. A. (1995). Sex differences among the personality disorders: An explanation of the data. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2, 225–238.
Costa, P., &; McCrae, R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Cronbach, L. J., &; Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.
Ekselius, L., Bodlund, O., von Knorring, L., Liindstrom, E., &; Kullgren, G. (1996). Sex differences in DSM-III-R, axis II-personality disorders. Personality of Individual Differences, 20, 457–461.
Golomb, M., Fava, M., Abraham, M., &; Rosenbaum, J. (1995). Gender differences in personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 125, 579–582.
Hartung, C. M., &; Widiger, T. A. (1998). Gender differences in the diagnosis of mental disorders: Conclusions and controversites of the DSM-IV. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 260–278.
Henry, K. A., &; Cohen, C. J. (1983). The role of labeling processes in diagnosing borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 1527–1529.
Kaplan, M. (1983). A woman's view of the DSM-III. American Psychologist, 38, 786–792.
Kass, F., Spitzer, R.L., &; Williams, J. B. (1983). An empirical study of the issue of sex bias in the diagnostic criteria of DSM-III Axis II personality disorders. American Psychologist, 38, 799–801.
Lerman, H. (1996). Pigeonholing a woman's misery: A history and critical analysis of the psychodiagnosis of women in the twentieth century. New York: Basic Books.
Lilenfeld, S. O. (1992). The association between antisocial personality and somatization disorders: A review and integration of theoretical models. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 641–662.
Morey, L. C. (1991).Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Morey, L. C., &; Glutting, J. H. (1994). The Personality Assessment Inventory: Correlates with normal and abnormal personality. In S. Strack &; M. Lorr, (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 402–420). New York: Springer.
Morey, L. C. (2000). The challenge of construct validity in the assessment of psychopathology. In E. Helmes &; R. Goffin (Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment (pp. 141–172). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
Shrout, P. E., &; Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.
Sprock, J. (1996). Abnormality ratings of the DSM-III-R criteria for males vs. females. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 184, 14–316.
Torgersen, S., Kringlen, E., &; Cramer, V. (2001). The prevalence of personality disorders in a community sample. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58, 590–596.
Warner, R. (1978). The diagnosis of antisocial and hysterical personality disorders. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 166, 839–845.
Weissman, M. M. (1993). The epidemiology of personality disorders: A 1990 update. Journal of Personality Disorders (Suppl.), 44–62.
Widiger, T. A. (1998). Invited essay: Sex biases in the diagnosis of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 12, 95–118.
Widiger, T. A., &; Settle, S. A. (1987). Broverman et al. revisited: An artifactual sex bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 463–469.
Widiger, T. A., &; Spitzer, R. L. (1991). Sex bias in the diagnosis of personality disorders: Conceptual and methodological issues. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 1-22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morey, L.C., Warner, M.B. & Boggs, C.D. Gender Bias in the Personality Disorders Criteria: An Investigation of Five Bias Indicators. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 24, 55–65 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014005308914
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014005308914