Skip to main content
Log in

Unbinding Time: Alternate Work Schedules and Work-Life Balance

  • Published:
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine the possibility that alternate work schedules affect perceived work-life imbalance—the “time bind.” The results show that alternate schedules per se do not “unbind” time. However, perceived control of work schedules increases work-life balance net of family and work characteristics. The most consistent family characteristic predicting imbalance is being a parent. The most consistent work characteristic predicting imbalance is hours worked. Once we control for hours worked, women and part-timers are shown to perceive more imbalance. Younger and better educated persons also perceive more work-life imbalance. However, they also report higher levels of schedule control and since schedule control improves work-life balance, it may be more important for unbinding time than schedule alternatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, P. E. & Moen, P. (1999). Scaling back: Dual-earner couples' work-family strategies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 995-1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, Second Edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. & Coser, R. (1974). Greedy institutions: Patterns of undivided commitment. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fast, J. E. & Frederick, J. A. (1996). Working arrangements and time stress. Canadian Social Trends (Winter), 14-19.

  • Galinsky, E., Bond, J. T. & Friedman, D. E. (1993). The changing workforce: Highlights of the national study. New York: Families and Work Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, J. & Camarigg, V. (1992). Gender, parenthood, and job-family compatibility. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 131-151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B.A., Searle, S. & Klepa, L. (1991). Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 560-568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, R. D. (1978). Labor in monopoly, competitive, and state sectors of production. Politics and Society, 8, 429-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. A. & Gerson, K. (1998). Who are the overworked Americans? Review of Social Economy, 56, 442-459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, P. W. & Nock, S. L. (1985). Consequences of the family work day. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 619-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnunen, U. & Mauno, S. (1998). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict among employed women and men in Finland. Human Relations, 51, 157-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milkie, M. A. & Peltola, P. A. (1999). Playing all the roles: Gender and the work-family balancing act. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 476-490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowsky, J. & Ross, C. E. (1989). Social causes of psychological distress. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrey, C. (1984). Gender, time, and reduced work. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presser, H. B. (1986). Shift work among American women and child care. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 551-563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presser, H. B. (1995). Job, family and gender: Determinants of nonstandard work schedules among employed Americans in 1991. Demography, 32, 577-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. P. & Godbey, G. (1999). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time, 2 ed. University Park: Penn State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C. E. & Sastry, J. (1999). The sense of personal control. In C. S. Aneshensel & J. Phelan (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of mental health. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staines G. L. & Pleck, J. H. (1983). The impact of work schedules on the family. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staines, G. L. & Pleck, J. H. (1986). Work schedule flexibility and family life. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 7, 147-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1996). Half a job: Bad and good part-time jobs in a changing labor market. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1998). Workers on flexible and shift work in 1997. U.S. Department of Labor Report 98-119. Washington D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voydanoff, P. (1988). Work role characteristics, family structure demands, and work/family conflict. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 749-761.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. & Keith, B. (1990). The effect of shift work on the quality and stability of marital relations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 453-462.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tausig, M., Fenwick, R. Unbinding Time: Alternate Work Schedules and Work-Life Balance. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 22, 101–119 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016626028720

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016626028720

Navigation