Skip to main content
Log in

Predictors of Medicare costs in elderly beneficiaries with breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Determining the apportionment of costs of cancer care and identifying factors that predict costs are important for planning ethical resource allocation for cancer care, especially in markets where managed care has grown.

Design: This study linked tumor registry data with Medicare administrative claims to determine the costs of care for breast, colorectal, lung and prostate cancers during the initial year subsequent to diagnosis, and to develop models to identify factors predicting costs.

Subjects: Patients with a diagnosis of breast (n=1,952), colorectal (n=2,563), lung (n=3,331) or prostate cancer (n=3,179) diagnosed from 1985 through 1988.

Results: The average costs during the initial treatment period were $12,141 (s.d.=$10,434) for breast cancer, $24,910 (s.d.=$14,870) for colorectal cancer, $21,351 (s.d.=$14,813) for lung cancer, and $14,361 (s.d.=$11,216) for prostate cancer. Using least squares regression analysis, factors significantly associated with cost included comorbidity, hospital length of stay, type of therapy, and ZIP level income for all four cancer sites. Access to health care resources was variably associated with costs of care. Total R 2 ranged from 38% (prostate) to 49% (breast). The prediction error for the regression models ranged from <1% to 4%, by cancer site.

Conclusions: Linking administrative claims with state tumor registry data can accurately predict costs of cancer care during the first year subsequent to diagnosis for cancer patients. Regression models using both data sources may be useful to health plans and providers and in determining appropriate prospective reimbursement for cancer, particularly with increasing HMO penetration and decreased ability to capture complete and accurate utilization and cost data on this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.P. Rice, T.A. Hodgson and F. Capell, The economic burden of cancer, 1985: United States and California, in: Cancer Care and Cost: DRGs and Beyond, eds. R.M. Scheffler and N.C. Andrews (Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor, MI, 1989), pp. 39–59.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Rundle, Sellick pioneers selling cancer care in HMOs, Wall Street Journal 12 (August 1996) 81–82.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Fowles, P. Weiner, D. Knutson, E. Fowler, A. Tucker and M. Ireland, Taking health status into account when setting capitation rates; a comparison of risk-adjustment methods, Journal of the American Medical Association 276(16) (1996) 1316–1321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. G.F. Riley, A.L. Potosky, J.D. Lubitz and L.G. Kessler, Medicare payments from diagnosis to death for elderly cancer patients by stage at diagnosis, Medical Care 33 (1995) 828–841.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G.L. Lu-Yao, D. McLerran, M. Wasson and J.E. Wennberg, An assessment of radical prostatectomy time trends, geographic variation and outcomes, Journal of the American Medical Association 269(20) (1993) 2633–2636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C.E. Desch, L. Penberthy, C.J. Newschaffer, B.E. Hillner, M. Whittemore, D. McClish, T.J. Smith and S.M. Retchin, Factors that determine the treatment for local and regional prostate cancer, Medical Care 34 (1996) 152–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A.B. Nattinger, M.S. Gottlieb, J. Veum, D. Yahnke and J.S. Goodwin, Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer, New England Journal of Medicine 326 (1992) 1102–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. T.J. Smith, L. Penberthy, C.E. Desch, M. Whittemore, C. Newschaffer, B.E. Hillner, D. McClish and S.M. Retchin, Differences in initial treatment patterns and outcomes of lung cancer in the elderly, Lung Cancer 13 (1995) 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C.J. Newschaffer, L. Penberthy, C.E. Desch, S.M. Retchin and M. Whittemore, The effect of age and comorbidity of non-metastatic breast cancer in elderly women, Archives of Internal Medicine 156 (1996) 85–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Anonymous, Revised standardized per capita rate of payment for 1995 (Health Care Financing Administration, 1995).

  11. D.K. McClish, L. Penberthy, M. Whittemore, C. Newschaffer, C. Woolard, C.E. Desch and S.M. Retchin, Ability of Medicare claims data and cancer registries to identify cancer cases and treatment, American Journal of Epidemiology 145 (1997) 227–233.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A.L. Potosky, G.F. Riley, J.D. Lubitz, R.M. Mentnech and L.G. Kessler, Potential for cancer related health services research using a linked Medicare-tumor registry database, Medical Care 31 (1993) 732–748.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Charlson and A. Feinstein, An analytic critique of existing systems of staging for breast cancer, Surgery 73(4) (1973) 579–598.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D.E. Henson, L. Ries and E.M. Shambaugh, Survival results depend on the staging system, Semin. Surgical Oncology 8 (1992) 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M.E. Charlson, P. Pompei, K.L. Ales and C.R. MacKenzie, A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation, Journal of Chronic Diseases 40 (1987) 373–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. P.S. Romano, L.L. Roos and J.G. Jollis, Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 46 (1993) 1075–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. P.B. Ginsburg and J.R. Gabel, Tracking health care costs: what's new in 1998?, Health Affairs 17(3) (1998) 141–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. K. Godfrey, Medical Uses of Statistics, 2nd ed., Chapter 12 (New England Journal of Medicine Books, Boston, MA, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kleinbaum, Kupper and Muller, Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods, Chapter 12: Regression Diagnostics, 2nd ed. (Kent Publishing Company, Boston, MA, 1988), pp. 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Cohen and P. Cohen, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum, 1983).

  21. S.H. Taplin, W. Barlow, N. Urban, M.T. Mandelson, D.J. Timlin, L. Ichikawa et al., Stage, age, comorbidity, and direct costs of colon, prostate, and breast cancer care, Journal of the National Cancer Institute 87 (1995) 417–426.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Von Korff, E. Wagner and K. Saunders, A chronic disease score from automated pharmacy data, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 45 (1992) 197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R.M. Scheffler and K.A. Phillips, DRGs and the financing of cancer care in the United States: new estimates and new issues, in: Cancer Care and Cost: DRGs and Beyond, eds. R.M. Scheffler and N.C. Andrews (Health Administration Press Perspectives, Ann Arbor, MI, 1989), pp. 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J.Z. Ayanian and E. Guadagnoli, Variations in breast cancer treatment by patient and provider characteristics, Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 40 (1996) 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. L.I. Iezzoni, J.Z. Ayanian, D.W. Bates and H.R. Burstin, Paying more fairly for Medicare capitated care, N. Engl. J. Med. 339 (1998) 1933–1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. J.C. Robinson, Consolidation of medical groups into physician practice management organizations, JAMA 279 (1998) 144–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. D.C. Hsai, W.M. Krushat, A.B. Fagan, J.A. Tebbutt and R.P. Kusserow, Accuracy of diagnostic coding for Medicare patients under the prospective-payment system, N. Engl. J. Med. 318 (1988) 352–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. S. Long, J. Gibbs, J. Crozier et al., Medical expenditures of terminal cancer patients during the last year of life, Inquiry 21 (1984) 315–327.

    Google Scholar 

  29. G. Riley, J. Lubitz, R. Prihoda and E. Rabey, Use and costs of Medicare services by cause of death, Inquiry 24 (1987) 233–244.

    Google Scholar 

  30. L.C. Hanson, M. Danis, J.M. Garrett and E. Mutran, Who decides? Physicians' willingness to use life-sustaining treatment, Arch. Intern. Med. 156 (1996) 785–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. S.M. Retchin and D.J. Ballard, Establishing standards for the utility of administrative claims data, Health Services Research 32 (1998) 861–866.

    Google Scholar 

  32. S.M. Retchin and R.E. Hurley, The revision of governmentsponsored health care, American Journal of Medicine 98 (1995) 529–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. W.P. Welch and H.G. Welch, Fee-for-data: a strategy to open the HMO black box, Health Affairs 14(4) (1995) 104–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Penberthy, L., Retchin, S.M., McDonald, M.K. et al. Predictors of Medicare costs in elderly beneficiaries with breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer. Health Care Management Science 2, 149–160 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019096030306

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019096030306

Keywords

Navigation