Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Predictors of Coping with Work Stress: The Influences of Sex, Gender Role, Social Desirability, and Locus of Control

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This investigation examined the influence of 4 personal attributes—sex, gender role, social desirability, and locus of control—as predictors of coping with work stress. Participants were 208 employed adult students (154 females and 54 males), primarily European Americans (90.4%) from working-class backgrounds. Theresults indicated that men were more likely to use alcohol and women more likely to use direct action. Femininity and/or masculinity scores predicted control-related coping butwere unrelated to escape-related coping. High social desirability scores predicted direct action coping, whereas low scores predicted alcohol use. In terms of locus of control, an internal orientation predicted help-seeking and positive thinking, a powerful others orientation predicted avoidance/resignation, and a chance orientation predicted alcohol use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42 155-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1977). On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45 196-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat, R. S., Allie, S. M., & Ford, D. L., Jr. (1995). Coping with stressful life events: An empirical analysis. In R. Crandall & P. L. Perrewe (Eds.), Occupational stress: A handbook (pp. 93-112). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar, D. (1988). Professional women in organizations: New paradigms for research and action. Sex Roles, 18 343-355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, G. (2001). Testing the discriminant validity of occupational entrenchment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74 85-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, E. N. (1987). The influence of sex-role identity and occupational attainment in the psychological well-being of Asian American women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11 69-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costos, D. (1986). Sex role identity in young adults: Its parental antecedents and relation to ego development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 602-611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. (1990). Job stress and the buffering effect of supervisory support. Group and Organizational Studies, 15 92-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichinger, J., Heifetz, L. J., & Ingraham, C. (1991). Situational shifts in sex-role orientation: Correlates of work satisfaction and burnout among women in special education. Sex Roles, 25 425-440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A., Frese, M., & Cooper, C. L. (2000). Revisions and further developments of the Occupational Stress Indicator: LISREL results from four Dutch studies. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73 221-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadzella, B. M. (1994). Locus of control differences among stress groups. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79 1619-1624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, P. A., & Hobfoll, S. E. (1994). Gender differences in job stress, tedium, and social support in the workplace. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11 555-572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianakos, I. (1995). The relation of sex-role identity to career decision-making self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 46 131-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianakos, I. (1996). Career development differences between adult and traditional-aged learners. Journal of Career Development, 22 211-223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianakos, I. (2000). Gender roles and coping with work stress. Sex Roles, 42 1059-1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianakos, I., Subich, L. M. (1988). Student sex and sex role in relation to college major choice. The Career Development Quarterly, 36 259-268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenglass, E. R. (1993). The contribution of social support to coping strategies. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 42 323-340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenglass, E. R. (1995). Gender, work stress, and coping: Theoretical implications. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(6), 121-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, S., & Fagot, B. I. (1988). Chronic stress and coping styles: A comparison of male and female undergraduates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55 819-823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havlovic, S. J., & Keenan, J. P. (1995). Coping with work stress: The influence of individual differences. In R. Crandall & P. L. Perrewe (Eds.), Occupational stress: A handbook (pp. 179-192). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 285-308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasek, R. A., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krausz, M., Kedem, P., Tal, Z., & Amir, Y. (1992). Sex-role orientation and work adaptation of male nurses. Research in Nursing and Health, 15 391-398.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaCroix, A. Z., & Haynes, S. G. (1987). Gender differences in the health effects of workplace roles. In R. C. Barnett, L. Biener, & G. T. Baruch (Eds.), Gender and stress (pp. 96-121). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latack, J. C. (1986). Coping with job stress: Measures and future directions for scale development. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71 377-385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latack, J. C., & Havlovic, S. J. (1992). Coping with job stress: A conceptual evaluation framework for coping measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13 479-508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, H. (1974). Activism and powerful others: Distinctions within the concept of internal-external control. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38 377-383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, H. (1981). Differentiating among internality, powerful others, and chance. In H. M. Lefcourt (Ed.), Research with the locus of control construct (Vol. 1, pp. 15-63). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, B. C. (1989). Sex-role orientation, coping strategies, and self-efficacy of women in traditional and nontraditional occupations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13 307-324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D., Tellegen, A., & Butcher, J. N. (1983). Masculinity, femininity, and androgyny viewed and assessed as distinct concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44 428-439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piltch, C. A., Walsh, D. C., Mangione, T. W., & Jennings, S. E. (1994). Gender, work, and mental distress in an industrial labor force: An expansion of Karasek's job strain model. In G. P. Keita & J. J. Hurrell Jr. (Eds.), Job stress in a changing workforce: Investigating gender, diversity, and family issues (pp. 39-45). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugliesi, K., & Shook, S. L. (1998). Gender, ethnicity, and network characteristics: Variation in social support resources. Sex Roles, 38 215-238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. E., & Skarie, E. K. (1986). Professional women: Job role stresses and psychosocial variables. American Mental Health Counselors Association Journal, 8 157-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (1, Whole No. 609).

  • Spector, P. E. (1986). Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations, 39 1005-1116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., & Reheiser, E. C. (1995). Measuring occupational stress: The Job Stress Survey. In R. Crandall & P. L. Perrewe (Eds.), Occupational stress: A handbook (pp. 51-69). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trocki, K. F., & Orioli, E. M. (1994). Gender differences in stress symptoms, stress-producing contexts, and coping strategies. In G. P. Keita & J. J. Hurrell Jr. (Eds.), Job stress in a changing workforce: Investigating gender, diversity, and family issues (pp. 7-22). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D. B., & Dougherty, T. W. (1994). Role of protégé personality in receipt of mentoring and career success. Academy of Management Journal, 37 688-702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ushasree, S., Seshu Reddy, B. V., & Vinolya, P. (1995). Gender, gender-role, and age effects in teachers' job stress and job satisfaction. Psychological Studies, 40(2) 72-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vingerhoets, A. J., & Van Heck, G. L. (1990). Gender, coping, and psychosomatic symptoms. Psychological Medicine, 20 125-135.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, Kent State University, Trumbull Campus, 4314 Mahoning Avenue, Warren, Ohio, 44483-1998

    Irene Gianakos

Authors
  1. Irene Gianakos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gianakos, I. Predictors of Coping with Work Stress: The Influences of Sex, Gender Role, Social Desirability, and Locus of Control. Sex Roles 46, 149–158 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019675218338

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019675218338

Search

Navigation