Skip to main content
Log in

Attentional Resources Measured by Reaction Times Highlight Differences Within Pleasant and Unpleasant, High Arousing Stimuli

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Simple reaction times (RTs) to acoustic tones were recorded during picture viewing in order to investigate attentional resource allocation to threat stimuli compared with pleasant (sport/adventure) and neutral (household objects) contents. Stimuli were selected as equally arousing according to standardized subjective ratings. In the late stage of picture processing threat pictures showed shorter RTs compared with neutral and pleasant ones. In a second study, a choice-RT task was employed, and a wider range of both pleasant and unpleasant contents was shown. Results indicated slower RTs when blood/injury and erotic couples were presented, compared with other threat, and with other positive (sport/adventure) scenes. Specifically, erotic couples require a greater amount of attentional resources compared with sport/adventure; the same is true for blood/injury stimuli as compared with threat. Remarkable differences were thus shown in attentional deployment to specific stimulus contents within the same valence category. These differences should be taken into account when using such stimuli to investigate emotional processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation I: Defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion, 1, 276–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, M. M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (1996). Picture media and emotion: Effects of a sustained affective content. Psychophysiology, 33, 662–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, M. M., Greenwald, M. K., & Hamm, A. O. (1993). Affective picture processing. In N. Birbaumer & A. öhman (Eds.), The structure of emotion (pp. 48–65). Toronto, ON: Hogrefe-Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, W. B. (1927). The James-Lange theory of emotion: A critical examination and an alternative theory. American Journal of Psychology, 39, 106–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention (CSEA-NIMH). (1999). The International Affective Picture System: Digitized photographs. Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.

  • Derryberry, D., & Rothbart, M. K. (1997). Reactive and effortful processes in the organization of temperament. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 633–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derryberry, D., & Tucker, D. M. (1994). Motivating the focus of attention. In P. M. Niedenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.), The heart's eye. Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 167–196). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, E. B., & Kozak, M. J. (1993). The meaning and the structure of fear. In N. Birbaumer & A. öhman (Eds.), The structure of emotion (pp. 110–121). Toronto, ON: Hogrefe-Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E. (1993). Allocation of visual attention and anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhouse, S., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, C., Purcell, D. G., Bersine, L., Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R. D. (1989). Probing “pop-out”: Another look at the face-in-the-crowd effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27, 563–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R. D. (1988). Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 917–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R. D. (1994). Automatic emotion: Attention and facial efference. In P. M. Niedenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.), The heart's eye. Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 217–243). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junghöfer, M., Bradley, M. M., Elbert, T. R., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Fleeting images: A new look at early emotion discrimination. Psychophysiology, 22, 545–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klorman, R., Weissberg, R. P., & Wiesenfeld, A. R. (1977). Individual differences in fear and autonomic reactions to affective stimulation. Psychophysiology, 14, 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, J. I., & Lacey, B. C. (1970). Some autonomic–central nervous system interrelationships. In P. Black (Ed.), Physiological correlates of human emotion (pp. 205–227). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). Motivated attention: Affect, activation and action. In P. Lang, R. F. Simons, & M. Balaban (Eds.), Attention and orienting: Sensory and motivational processes (pp. 97–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1999). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Technical Manual and Affective Ratings. Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J., Greenwald, M. K., Bradley, M. M., & Hamm, A. O. (1993). Looking at pictures: Affective, facial, visceral, and behavioural reactions. Psychophysiology, 30, 261–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., May, J., Mogg, K., & Eysenck, M. (1990). Attentional bias in anxiety: Selective search or defective filtering? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 166–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., & McLeod, C. (1986). Discrimination of threat cues without awareness in anxiety states. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 131–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J., Riemann, B. C., & Kim, E. (1990). Selective processing of threat cues in panic disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 407–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogg, K., Mathews, A., & Eysenck, M. (1992). Attentional bias to threat in clinical anxiety states. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 149–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogg, K., Mathews, A., Eysenck, M., & May, J. (1991). Biased cognitive operations in anxiety: Artefact, processing priorities or attentional search? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29, 459–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogg, K., Mathews, A., & Weinman, J. (1989). Selective processing of threat cues in anxiety states: A replication. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 27, 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nothdurft, H. C. (1993). Faces and facial expressions do not pop out. Perception, 22, 1287–1298.

    Google Scholar 

  • öhman, A. (1986). Face the beast and fear the face: Animal and social fears as prototypes for evolutionary analyses of emotion. Psychophysiology, 23, 123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • öhman, A. (1997). As fast as the blink of an eye: Evolutionary preparedness for preattentive processing of threat. In P. J. Lang, R. F. Simons, & M. T. Balaban (Eds.), Attention and orienting: Sensory and motivational processing (pp. 1–27). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • öhman, A., & Soares J. J. F. (1993). On the automatic nature of phobic fear: Conditioned electrodermal responses to masked fear-relevant stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomba, D., Sarlo, M., Angrilli, A., Mini, A., & Stegagno, L. (2000). Cardiac responses associated with affective processing of unpleasant film stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 36, 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plutchik, R. (1970). Emotions, evolution, and adaptive processes. In M. Arnold (Ed.), Feelings and emotions: The Loyola Symposium. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, D. G., Stewart, A. L., & Skov, R. B. (1996). It takes a confounded face to pop out of a crowd. Perception, 25, 1091–1108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachman, S. (1998). Anxiety. In C. R. Brewin (Ed.), Clinical psychology: A modular course. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riglis, E. (1998). Modeling visual complexity in image architectures. PhD First Year Report, Edinburgh, U.K.: Heriot-Watt University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarlo, M., Codispoti, M., Palomba, D., Angrilli, A., & Stegagno, L. (1997). Danger! Attention in emotional contexts. Poster presented at the AIP/EPS Meeting, Cardiff, U.K., July 2–4.

  • Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory. An integrated system for IBM-PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computer, 20, 206–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares, J. J. F., & öhman, A. (1993). Preattentive processing, preparedness and phobias: Effects of instruction on conditioned electrodermal responses to masked and non-masked fear-relevant stimuli. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, F. N., McKenna, F. P., Sharrock, R., & Trezise, L. (1986). Colour naming of phobia-related words. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, M. (1939). Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A Sourcebook of Gestalt Psychology (pp. 331–363). New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. (1995). Preattentive analysis of facial expressions of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 439–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpe, J., & Lang, P. J. (1964). A fear survey schedule for use in behaviour therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2, 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buodo, G., Sarlo, M. & Palomba, D. Attentional Resources Measured by Reaction Times Highlight Differences Within Pleasant and Unpleasant, High Arousing Stimuli. Motivation and Emotion 26, 123–138 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019886501965

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019886501965

Navigation