Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Helper and Recipient Sex on the Experience and Outcomes of Comforting Messages: An Experimental Investigation

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this experimental study was to examine whether and in what ways the sex of the helper and the recipient moderate the effects of comforting messages in face-to-face interactions. A total of 216 participants disclosed an emotionally upsetting event to a confederate trained to display different levels of nonverbal immediacy and verbal person centeredness. Men and women responded very similarly to comforting messages that exhibited different levels of verbal person centeredness and nonverbal immediacy, and this response similarity was not moderated by the sex of the helper. Both men and women were most comforted by messages that exhibited high levels of person centeredness and nonverbal immediacy, and they were least comforted by messages that exhibited low levels of these qualities. Moreover, both sexes viewed highly person-centered and immediate messages as exhibiting the highest comforting quality, and, with one minor exception, both sexes viewed helpers who used these messages as the most competent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acitelli, L. K. (1996). The neglected links between marital support and marital satisfaction. In G. R. Pierce, B. R. Sarason, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Handbook of social support and the family (pp. 83–104). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, P. A. (1985). Nonverbal immediacy in interpersonal communication. In W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 1–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, J. F., Andersen, P. A., & Jensen, A. D. (1979). The measurement of nonverbal immediacy. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 7, 153–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aries, E. J. (1996). Men and women in interaction: Reconsidering the differences. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balswick, J. (1988). The inexpressive male. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, L. A. (1986). Gender differences in the heterosexual relationship rules embedded in break-up accounts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3 289–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., & Seeman, T. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science and Medicine, 51 843–857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullis, C., & Horn, C. (1995). Get a little closer: Further examination of nonverbal comforting strategies. Communication Reports, 8 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Newton, D. A., Walther, J. B., & Baesler, E. J. (1989). Nonverbal expectancy violations and conversational involvement. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11 114–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Stern, L. A., & Dillman, L. (1995). Interpersonal adaptation: Dyadic interaction patterns. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Walther, J. B., & Baesler, E. J. (1992). Interpretations and consequences of interpersonal touch. Human Communication Research, 19 237–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, M., Birk, T., & Hall, J. R. (1991). Compliance and satisfaction with physician–patient communication: An expectancy theory interpretation of gender differences. Human Communication Research, 18 177–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burleson, B. R. (1994a). Comforting communication: Significance, approaches, and effects. In B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. 3–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burleson, B. R. (1994b). Comforting messages: Features, functions, and outcomes. In J. A. Daly & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), Strategic interpersonal communication (pp. 135–161). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burleson, B. R. (1997). A different voice on different cultures: Illusion and reality in the study of sex differences in personal relationships. Personal Relationships, 4 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burleson, B. R., & Goldsmith, D. J. (1998). How the comforting process works: Alleviating emotional distress through conversationally induced reappraisals. In P. A. Andersen & L. K. Guerrero (Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts (pp. 245–280). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burleson, B. R., Kunkel, A. W., Samter, W., & Werking, K. J. (1996). Men's and women's evaluations of communication skills in personal relationships: When sex differences make a difference–and when they don't. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13 201–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burleson, B. R., & Mortenson, S. R. (in press). Explaining cultural differences in evaluations of emotional support behaviors: Exploring the mediating influences of value systems and interaction goals. Communication Research.

  • Burleson, B. R., & Planalp, S. (2000). Producing emotion(al) messages. Communication Theory, 10 221–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burleson, B. R., & Samter, W. (1985). Individual differences in the perception of comforting messages: An exploratory investigation. Central States Speech Journal, 36 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canary, D. J., & Hause, K. S. (1993). Is there any reason to research sex differences in communication? Communication Quarterly, 41 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancian, F. (1987). Love in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cegala, D. J. (1984). Affective and cognitive manifestations of interaction involvement during unstructure and competitive interactions. Communication Monographs, 51 320–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L. F. (1993). Stress and the cognitive-conversational benefits of social interaction. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 12 25–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. A., Pierce, A. J., Finn, K., Hsu, K., Toosley, A., & Williams, L. (1998). The impact of alternative approaches to comforting, closeness of relationship, and gender on multiple measures of effectiveness. Communication Studies, 49 224–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, M. R., & Barbee, A. P. (2000). Social support. In C. Hendrick & S. S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 272–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutrona, C. E. (1996). Social support in couples. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutrona, C. E., & Russell, D. W. (1987). The provisions of social relationships and adaptations to stress. In W. H. Jones & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 1, pp. 37–67). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutrona, C. E., & Russell, D. W. (1990). Types of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, & G. R. Pierce (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 319–366). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94 369–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolin, D. J., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (1993). Reach out and touch someone: Analysis of nonverbal comforting responses. Communication Quarterly, 41 383–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunkel-Schetter, C., Blasband, D., Feinstein, L., & Herbert, T. (1992). Elements of supportive interactions: When are attempts to help effective? In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Helping and being helped: Naturalistic studies (pp. 83–114). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, R. M., & Skidmore, J. R. (1987). Masculine gender role stress: Scale development and component factors in the appraisal of stressful situations. Behavior Modification, 11 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. (1985). Helpful and nonhelpful events in brief counseling interviews: An empirical taxonomy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32 307–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabes, R. A., & Martin, C. L. (1991). Gender and age stereotypes of emotionality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17 532–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2000). The relation between gender and emotions in different cultures. In A. H. Fischer (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 71–94). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, D. J., & Fulfs, P. A. (1999). "You just don't have the evidence": An analysis of claims and evidence in Deborah Tannen's You Just Don't Understand. In M. E. Roloff (Ed.), Communication yearbook 22 (pp. 1–49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, D. J., McDermott, V. M., & Alexander, S. C. (2000). Helpful, supportive, and sensitive: Measuring the evaluation of enacted support in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17 369–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, B. H. (1994). Social support. In A. L. Weber & J. H. Harvey (Eds.), Perspectives on close relationships (pp. 307–324). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (2001). Meta-emotion, children's emotional intelligence, and buffering children from marital conflict. In C. D. Ryff & B. H. Singer (Eds.), Emotion, social relationships, and health (pp. 23–40). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L. S., Rice, L. N., & Elliott, R. (1993). Facilitating emotional change: The moment-by-moment process. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudykunst, W. B., & Matsumoto, Y. (1996). Cross-cultural variability of communication in personal relationships. In W. B. Gudykunst, S. Ting-Toomey, & T. Nishida (Eds.), Communication in personal relationships across cultures (pp. 19–56). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, J. L., Tighe, M. R., & Mongeau, P. A. (1997). Effects of event type and sex on comforting messages. Communication Research Reports, 14 214–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, V. S., & Cohen, S. (1996). Social support and adjustment to cancer: Reconciling descriptive, correlational, and intervention research. Health Psychology, 15 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, F. L. (1989). Women's culture and communication: An analytical perspective. In C. M. Lont & S. A. Friedley (Eds.), Beyond boundaries: Sex and gender diversity in communication (pp. 301–316). Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. T., & Shulman, G. A. (1988). More alike than meets the eye: Perceived gender differences in subjective experience and its display. Sex Roles, 19 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. M., & Burleson, B. R. (1997). The impact of situational variables on helpers' perceptions of comforting messages: An attributional analysis. Communication Research, 24 530–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. M., & Guerrero, L. A. (2001). The effects of nonverbal immediacy and verbal person centeredness in the emotional support process. Human Communication Research, 27 567–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel, A. W. (2002). Explaining sex differences in the evaluation of comforting messages: The mediating role of interaction goals. Communication Reports, 15 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel, A. W., & Burleson, B. R. (1998). Social support and the emotional lives of men and women: An assessment of the different cultures perspective. In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (pp. 101–125). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel, A. W., & Burleson, B. R. (1999). Assessing explanations for sex differences in emotional support: A test of the different cultures and skill specialization accounts. Human Communication Research, 25 307–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyratzis, A., & Guo, J. (1996). "Separate worlds for girls and boys?" Views from U. S. and Chinese mixed-sex friendship groups. In D. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis, & J. Guo (Eds.), Social interaction, social context, and language: Essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (pp. 555–577). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, A. E. (1996). Affect-congruency in message content: A preliminary evaluation of two accounts. Communication Quarterly, 44 440–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, A. E., & Zakahi, W. R. (1998). Perceptions of men and women departing from conversational sex role stereotypes during initial interaction. In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (pp. 393–412). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, C. A. (1988). Unnatural emotions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGeorge, E. L., Clark, R. A., & Gillihan, S. J. (2002). Sex differences in the provision of skillful emotional support: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Communication Reports, 15 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, K. E., & Carrell, L. J. (1999). The impact of gender and immediacy on willingness to talk and perceived learning. Communication Education, 48 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noller, P. (1993). Gender and emotional communication in marriage: Different cultures or differential social power? Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12 132–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W. (1997). Opening up: The healing power of expressing emotions (Rev. ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rook, K. S., & Underwood, L. G. (2000). Social support measurement and interventions: Comments and future directions. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention (pp. 311–334). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samter, W. (1994). Unsupportive relationships: Deficiencies in the support-giving skills of the lonely person's friends. In B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), The communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. 195–214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samter, W. (2002). How gender and cognitive complexity influence the provision of emotional support: A study of indirect effects. Communication Reports, 15 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samter, W., Burleson, B. R., & Murphy, L. B. (1987). Comforting conversations: Effects of strategy type on evaluations of messages and message producers. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 52 263–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samter, W., Whaley, B. B., Mortenson, S. R., & Burleson, B. R. (1997). Ethnicity and emotional support in same-sex friendship: A comparison of Asian-Americans, African-Americans, and Euro-Americans. Personal Relationships, 4 413–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., & Gurung, R. A. R. (1997). Close personal relationships and health outcomes: A key to the role of social support. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed.), pp. 547–573). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saurer, M. K., & Eisler, R. M. (1990). The role of masculine gender role stress in expressivity and social support network factors. Sex Roles, 23 261–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeman, T. E. (2001). How do others get under our skin? Social relationships and health. In C. D. Ryff & B. H. Singer (Eds.), Emotion, social relationships, and health (pp. 189–210). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. M., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1999). Sharing one's story: Translating emotional experiences into words as a coping tool. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping: The psychology of what works (pp. 70–89). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, D., & Kimerling, R. (2001). Group psychotherapy for women with breast cancer: Relationships among social support, emotional expression, and survival. In C. D. Ryff & B. H. Singer (Eds.), Emotion, social relationships, and health (pp. 97–123). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzberg, B. H. (1988). Communication competence: Measures of perceived effectiveness. In C. H. Tardy (Ed.), A handbook for the study of human communication: Methods and instruments for observing, measuring, and assessing communications processes (pp. 67–105). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., Metts, S., Burleson, B., Hatfield, E., & Thompson, A. (1995). Domains of expressive interaction in intimate relationships: Associations with satisfaction and commitment. Family Relations, 44 203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroebe, W., & Stroebe, M. (1996). The social psychology of social support. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 597–621). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, S. (1989). Covert intimacy: Closeness in men's friendships. In B. J. Risman & P. Schwartz (Eds.), Gender in intimate relationships: A microstructural approach (pp. 71–86). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A. (1986). Social support as coping assistance. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 54 416–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, C. K., Jaccard, J., & Ramey, S. L. (1996). The relationship between social support and life satisfaction as a function of family structure. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58 502–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weger, H., & Polcar, L. E. (2002). Attachment style and person-centered comforting. Western Journal of Communication, 66 84–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. S. (1974). The provisions of social relationships. In Z. Rubin (Ed.), Doing unto others (pp. 17–26). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winstead, B. A., Derlega, V. J., Lewis, R. J., Sanchez-Hucles, J., & Clarke, E. (1992). Friendship, social interaction, and coping with stress. Communication Research, 19 193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. T. (1993). Engendered relations: Interaction, caring, power, and responsibility in intimacy. In S. Duck (Ed.), Social context and relationships (pp. 26–54). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. T. (1994). Who cares? Women, care, and culture. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. T. (1997). Gendered lives: Communication, gender, and culture (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. T., & Dindia, K. (1998). What's the difference? A dialogue about differences and similarities between women and men. In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (pp. 19–40). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. T., & Inman, C. (1993). In a different mode: Masculine styles of communicating closeness. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 21 279–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., & Burleson, B. R. (2001). Effects of sex, culture, and support type on perceptions of spousal social support: An assessment of the "support gap" hypothesis in early marriage. Human Communication Research, 27 535–566.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, S.M., Burleson, B.R. Effects of Helper and Recipient Sex on the Experience and Outcomes of Comforting Messages: An Experimental Investigation. Sex Roles 48, 1–19 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022393827581

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022393827581

Navigation