Skip to main content
Log in

Sampling for Possibilities

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper views empirical research as a search for illustrations of interesting possibilities which have occurred, and the exploration of the variety of such possibilities in a sample or universe. This leads to a definition of “illustrative inference” (in contrast to statistical inference), which, we argue, is of considerable importance in many fields of inquiry – ranging from market research and qualitative research in social science, to cosmology. Sometimes, it may be helpful to model illustrative inference quantitatively, so that the size of a sample can be linked to its power (for illustrating possibilities): we outline one model based on probability theory, and another based on a resampling technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-Based Reasoning. San Mateo, California: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konijn, H.S. (1973). Statistical Theory of Sample Survey Design and Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1981). Science and pseudo-science. In: S. Brown, J. Fauvel, & R. Finnegan (eds), Conceptions of Inquiry. London: Methuen, pp. 114–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maisel, R. & Persell, C.H. (1996). How Sampling Works. Thousand Oaks, California: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd edn). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noreen, E.W. (1989). Computer Intensive Methods for Testing Hypotheses. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowack, K.M. (1990, April). Getting them out and getting them back. Training and Development Journal, 82–85.

  • nQuery Advisor (1995). Cork, Ireland: Statistical Solutions Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn, J. & Christy, R. (1994). Marketing by smaller wine producers and penetration of new distribution channels. International Journal of Wine Marketing 6(3/4): 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. (1980). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprent, P. (1981). Quick Statistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shvyrkov, V.V. (1997). The new statistical thinking. Quality & Quantity 31(2): 155–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J.L. (1992). Resampling: The New Statistics. Arlington, VA: Resampling Stats, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T.M.F. (1976). Statistical Sampling for Accountants.London: Accountancy Age Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, W. (1991). Taking stock: issues from the literature on validity and reliability in qualitative research. Journal of the Market Research Society 33(1): 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.K. (1992). Sampling. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tryfos, P. (1996). Sampling Methods for Applied Research. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. (1997). The statistical paradigm in the social sciences-and its alternatives. Paper presented at the Conference: Uncertainty, Knowledge and Skill, Hasselt, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M., & Preece, D. (1992). Using quality measures: practice, problems and possibilities. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 9(7): 42–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K. (1993). Applications of Case Study Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wood, M., Christy, R. Sampling for Possibilities. Quality & Quantity 33, 185–202 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026435213337

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026435213337

Keywords

Navigation