Skip to main content
Log in

Benefit Transfer in Europe: How Reliable Are Transfers between Countries?

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The benefits for specific health impacts related to air and water quality were measured in simultaneous contingent valuation surveys conducted in five different European countries. Consistent inter-country differences in willingness to pay to avoid ill health episodes could not be explained by measurable differences in individual characteristics. International transfer of unit values resulted in an average transfer error of 38%. Accounting for measurable differences among countries in health status, income and other demographic measures, either through ad hoc adjustments to the transferred values or through value function transfer, did not improve transfer performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberini, A., M. Cropper, T. Fu, A. Krupnick, J. Liu, D. Shaw and W. Harrington (1997), ‘Valuing Health Effects of Air Pollution in Developing Countries: The Case of Taiwan’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 34, 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, K. J., H. F. MacDonald, H. Cheng and D.W. McCollum (1998), ‘Bid Design and Yea Saying in Single-Bounded Dichotomous-Choice Questions’, Land Economics 74, 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, R. (2000), ‘Environmental Value Transfer: State of the Art and Future Prospects’, Ecological Economics 32, 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, R. and F. Spaniks (1999), The Validity of Environmental Benefits Transfer: Further Empirical Testing’, Environmental and Resource Economics 14, 95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champ, P. A., R. C. Bishop, T. C. Brown and D. W. McCollum (1997), ‘Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public Goods’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33, 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, R. G. and L. O. Taylor (1999), ‘Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method’, American Economic Review 89, 649–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, B. H., W. R. Dubourg, F. Machado, S. Mourato, S. Navrud, R. Ready, F. Spaninks and M. Vázquez Rodríguez (1999), Benefits Transfer and the Economic Valuation of Environmental Damage in the European Union with Special Reference to Health. Final Report for the DG-XII, European Commission, Contract ENV4-CT96-0227.

  • Dubourg, W. R., M.W. Jones-Lee and G. Loomes (1994), ‘Imprecise Preferences and theWTP-WTA Disparity’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 9, 115–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubourg, W. R., M.W. Jones-Lee and G. Loomes (1997), ‘Imprecise Preferences and Survey Design in Contingent Valuation’, Economica 64, 681–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, T. P. and R. A. Kramer (1995), ‘An Independent Sample Test of Yea-saying and Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous-Choice Contingent Valulation’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29, 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchoff, S., B. G. Colby and J. T. LaFrance (1997), ‘Evaluating the Performance of Benefit Transfer: An Empirical Inquiry’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33, 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristrom, B. (1990), ‘A Nonparametric Approach to the Estimation of Welfare Measures in Discrete Response Valuation Studies’, Land Economics 66, 135–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ready, R. C., S. Navrud, B. Day, W. R. Dubourg, F. Machado, S. Mourato, F. Spaninks and M. X. Vá Rodriguez (1999), Measuring WTP to Avoid Ill-health Episodes: Context Effects and Validity Tests, Paper Presented at EVE Workshop ‘Health and the Value of Life’. France: Strasbourg, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberger, R. S. and T. T. Phipps (2001), Site Correspondence Effects in Benefit Transfer: A Meta-Analysis Transfer Function, Research Paper 2001–6. Morgantown,West Virginia: Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolley, G., D. Kenkel and R. Fabian (1994), Valuing Health for Policy: An Economic Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, M. P. and G. L. Poe (1998), ‘Elicitation Effects in Contingent Valuation: Comparisons to a Multiple Bounded Discrete Choice Approach’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36, 170–185.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Ready.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ready, R., Navrud, S., Day, B. et al. Benefit Transfer in Europe: How Reliable Are Transfers between Countries?. Environmental and Resource Economics 29, 67–82 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000035441.37039.8a

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000035441.37039.8a

Navigation