Abstract
The benefits for specific health impacts related to air and water quality were measured in simultaneous contingent valuation surveys conducted in five different European countries. Consistent inter-country differences in willingness to pay to avoid ill health episodes could not be explained by measurable differences in individual characteristics. International transfer of unit values resulted in an average transfer error of 38%. Accounting for measurable differences among countries in health status, income and other demographic measures, either through ad hoc adjustments to the transferred values or through value function transfer, did not improve transfer performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alberini, A., M. Cropper, T. Fu, A. Krupnick, J. Liu, D. Shaw and W. Harrington (1997), ‘Valuing Health Effects of Air Pollution in Developing Countries: The Case of Taiwan’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 34, 107–126.
Boyle, K. J., H. F. MacDonald, H. Cheng and D.W. McCollum (1998), ‘Bid Design and Yea Saying in Single-Bounded Dichotomous-Choice Questions’, Land Economics 74, 49–64.
Brouwer, R. (2000), ‘Environmental Value Transfer: State of the Art and Future Prospects’, Ecological Economics 32, 137–152.
Brouwer, R. and F. Spaniks (1999), The Validity of Environmental Benefits Transfer: Further Empirical Testing’, Environmental and Resource Economics 14, 95–117.
Champ, P. A., R. C. Bishop, T. C. Brown and D. W. McCollum (1997), ‘Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public Goods’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33, 151–162.
Cummings, R. G. and L. O. Taylor (1999), ‘Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method’, American Economic Review 89, 649–665.
Day, B. H., W. R. Dubourg, F. Machado, S. Mourato, S. Navrud, R. Ready, F. Spaninks and M. Vázquez Rodríguez (1999), Benefits Transfer and the Economic Valuation of Environmental Damage in the European Union with Special Reference to Health. Final Report for the DG-XII, European Commission, Contract ENV4-CT96-0227.
Dubourg, W. R., M.W. Jones-Lee and G. Loomes (1994), ‘Imprecise Preferences and theWTP-WTA Disparity’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 9, 115–133.
Dubourg, W. R., M.W. Jones-Lee and G. Loomes (1997), ‘Imprecise Preferences and Survey Design in Contingent Valuation’, Economica 64, 681–702.
Holmes, T. P. and R. A. Kramer (1995), ‘An Independent Sample Test of Yea-saying and Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous-Choice Contingent Valulation’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29, 121–132.
Kirchoff, S., B. G. Colby and J. T. LaFrance (1997), ‘Evaluating the Performance of Benefit Transfer: An Empirical Inquiry’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33, 75–93.
Kristrom, B. (1990), ‘A Nonparametric Approach to the Estimation of Welfare Measures in Discrete Response Valuation Studies’, Land Economics 66, 135–139.
Ready, R. C., S. Navrud, B. Day, W. R. Dubourg, F. Machado, S. Mourato, F. Spaninks and M. X. Vá Rodriguez (1999), Measuring WTP to Avoid Ill-health Episodes: Context Effects and Validity Tests, Paper Presented at EVE Workshop ‘Health and the Value of Life’. France: Strasbourg, September.
Rosenberger, R. S. and T. T. Phipps (2001), Site Correspondence Effects in Benefit Transfer: A Meta-Analysis Transfer Function, Research Paper 2001–6. Morgantown,West Virginia: Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
Tolley, G., D. Kenkel and R. Fabian (1994), Valuing Health for Policy: An Economic Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Welsh, M. P. and G. L. Poe (1998), ‘Elicitation Effects in Contingent Valuation: Comparisons to a Multiple Bounded Discrete Choice Approach’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36, 170–185.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ready, R., Navrud, S., Day, B. et al. Benefit Transfer in Europe: How Reliable Are Transfers between Countries?. Environmental and Resource Economics 29, 67–82 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000035441.37039.8a
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000035441.37039.8a