Abstract
Analog materials are used as a substitute to cancellous bone for in vitro biomechanical tests due to their uniformity, consistency in properties and availability. To date, only the static material properties of these materials have been assessed, although they are often used in fatigue tests. Cancellous bone exhibits complex material behavior when subjected to fatigue loads, including modulus degradation, accumulation of permanent strain and increasing hysteresis. Analog materials should exhibit similar fatigue behavior to cancellous bone if they are to be used in cyclic loading tests. In our study, a polymer foam (commercial name HEREX® C70.55) has been studied for its static and fatigue behavior and compared with that of cancellous bone. In compression, the foam exhibited qualitatively similar mechanical behavior, but the degree of modulus degradation and accumulation of permanent strain was lower than expected for cancellous bone. In general, the tensile properties of the foam were greater than found in compression, the opposite to the mechanical behavior of cancellous bone. The methodology employed here could form the basis of selecting suitable analog materials for cancellous bone in the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. C. Behrens, P. S. Walker and H. Shoji, J. Biomech. 7 (1974) 201.
T. D. Brown and A. B. Ferguson, Jr, Acta Orthop. Scan. 51 (1980) 429.
R. Hodgskinson and J. D. Currey, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 3 (1992) 377.
I. Hvid, Dan. Med. Bull. 35 (1988) 345.
T. M. Keaveny and W. C. Hayes, J. Biomech. Eng. 115 (1993) 534.
T. M. Keaveny, R. E. Borchers, L. J. Gibson and W. C. Hayes, J. Biomech. 26 (1993) 991.
T. S. Keller, J. Biomech. 27 (1994) 1159.
F. Linde and I. Hvid, ibid. 22 (1989) 485.
M. Martens, R. L. Van Audekercke, P. Delport, P. de Meester and J. C. Mulier, ibid. 16 (1983) 971.
A. Odgaard and F. Linde, ibid. 24 (1991) 691.
L. Cristofolini, M. Viceconti, A. Cappello and A. Toni, ibid. 29 (1996) 525.
A. Shirazi-Adi, O. Patenaude, M. Damark and D. Zukor, J. Biomech. Eng. 123 (2001) 391.
J. A. Q. Simoes, M. A. Vaz, J. A. G. Chousal, M. Taylor and S. Blatcher, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Technology in Experimental Mechanics, Wakayama, 1997, p. 423.
J. A. Szivek, M. Thomas and J. B. Benjamin, J. Appl. Biomater. 4 (1993) 269.
J. A. Szivek, M. Thomas and J. B. Benjamin, ibid. 6 (1995) 125.
S. A. Maher, P. J. Prendergast and C. G. Lyons, Clin. Biomech. 16 (2001) 307.
ASTM F1839-97 (1998) p. 1278.
W. E. Caler and D. R. Carter, J. Biomech. 22 (1989) 625.
C. A. Pattin, W. E. Caler and D. R. Carter, ibid. 29 (1996) 69.
P. Zioupos, X. T. Wang and J. D. Currey, Clin. Biomech. 11 (1996) 365.
S. M. Bowman, X. E. Guo, D. W. Cheng, T. M. Keaveny, L. J. Gibson, W. C. Hayes and T. A. Mc Mohan, J. Biomech. Eng. 120 (1998) 647.
S. M. Haddock, O. C. Yeh, P. V. Mummaneni, W. S. Rosenberg and T. M. Keaveny, 46th Annual Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society, Orlando, Florida, March 12–15, 2000.
M. C. Michel, X. E. Guo, L. J. Gibson, T. A. Mcmohan and W. C. Hayes, J. Biomech. 26 (1993) 453.
T. M. Keaveny, X. E. Guo, E. F. Watchel, T. A. Mcmohan and W. C. Hayes, ibid. 27 (1994) 1127.
R. B. Ashman, J. Y. Rho and C. H. Turner, ibid. 22 (1989) 895.
L. Rohl, E. Larsen, F. Linde, A. Odgaard and J. Jorgensen, ibid. 24 (1991) 1143.
D. R. Carter, G. H. Schwab and D. M. Spengler, Acta Orthop. Scand. 51 (1980) 733.
T. M. Keaveny, E. F. Wachtel, C. M. Ford and W. C. Hayes, J. Biomech. 27 (1994) 1137.
J. S. Huang and J. Y. Lin, Acta Mater. 44 (1996) 289.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Palissery, V., Taylor, M. & Browne, M. Fatigue characterization of a polymer foam to use as a cancellous bone analog material in the assessment of orthopaedic devices. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 15, 61–67 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000010098.65572.3b
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000010098.65572.3b