Skip to main content
Log in

Serotype and PCR-fingerprints of Clinical and Environmental isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans in Chiang Mai, Thailand

  • Published:
Mycopathologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From May 1999 to April 2000, serotypes of clinical and environmental isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans were studied in Chiang Mai province, northern Thailand. Three hundred and eighty-five environmental samples, of which 100 were dove droppings, 55 pigeon droppings and 230 eucalyptus flower, were collected from7 Amphoes in Chiang Mai. C. neoformans was isolated from 45 of 100 (45.0%) dove dropping samples, 9 of 55 (16.4%) pigeon dropping samples and 2 of 230 (0.9%) eucalyptus flower samples. Serotypes of 56 environmental isolates and 75 clinical isolates ofC. neoformans, obtained during the same period, were determined by the slide agglutination test. Fifty-six environmental and 74 clinical isolates belonged to C. neoformans serotype A (C. neoformans var. grubii), and only one clinical isolate belonged to C. neoformans serotype AD. The isolation of C. neoformans var. grubii from eucalyptus flower samples suggests contamination of avian droppings. PCR-fingerprinting, using (GACA)4 as a primer, discriminated 131 clinical and environmental isolates into 2 groups (group I and II). Seventy-five clinical and 54 environmental isolates were of group I, which had two major specific bands of approximately 1,250 and 960 base pairs. Two environmental isolates, one from pigeon excreta and the other from a eucalyptus flower sample were of group II, which had two major specific bands of approximately 1,180 and 500 base pairs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chakrabarti AC, Jatana M, Kumar P, Chatha L, Kaushal A, Padhye A. Isolation of Cryptococcus neoformansvar. gattiifrom Eucalyptus camaldulensisin India. J Clin Microb 1997; 35(12): 3340–3342.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ellis DH, Pfeiffer TJ. Natural habitat of Cryptococcus neoformansvar. gattii. J Clin Microb 1990; 28: 1642–1644.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Emmons CW. Saprophytic sources of Cryptococcus neoformansassociated with the pigeon (Columba livia). Am J Hyg 1955; 62: 227–252.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Emmons CW. Prevalence of Cryptococcus neoformansin pigeon habitats. Public Health Rep 1960; 75: 362–364.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Emmons CW. Natural occurrence of opportunistic fungi. Lab Invest 1962; 11: 1026–1032.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Evans EE. The antigenic composition of Cryptococcus neoformans. I. A serologic classification by means of the capsular agglutinations. J Immunol 1950; 64: 423–430.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Franzot SP, Salkin IF, Casadevall A.Cryptococcus neoformansvar. grubii: Separate varietal status for Cryptococcus neoformansserotype A isolates. J Clin Microb 1999;37(3):838–840.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haynes KA, Sullivan DJ, Coleman DC et al. Involvement of multiple Cryptococcus neoformansstrains in a single episode of cryptococcosis and reinfection with novel strains in recurrent infection demonstrated by random amplification of polymorphic DNA and DNA fingerprinting. J Clin Microb 1995; 35(1): 99–102.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kersulyte D, Woods JP, Keath EJ, Goldman WE, Berg DE. Diversity among clinical isolates of Histoplasma capsulatumdetected by polymerase chain reaction with arbitrary primer. J Bacteriol 1992; 174: 7075–7079.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kwon-Chung KJ, Bennett JE. Cryptococcosis, In: Kwon-Chung KJ, Bennett JE, eds, Medical Mycology. Lea 7 Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lazera MS, Wanke B, Nishikawa MM. Isolation of both varieties of Cryptococcus neoformansfrom saprophytic sources in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Med Vet Mycol 1993; 31: 449–454.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer W, Mitchell TG, Freedman EZ, Vilgalys R. Hybridization probes for conventional DNA fingerprinting used as single primers in the polymerase chain reaction to distinguish strains of Cryptococcus neoformans. J Clin Microb 1993; 31(9): 2274–2280.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Passo CLP, Pernice I, Gallo M et al. Genetic relatedness and diversity of Cryptococcus neoformansstrains in the Maltese Islands. J Clin Microb 1997; 35(3): 751–755.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pfeiffer TJ, Ellis DH. Environmental isolation of Cryptococcus neoformansvar. gattiifrom California. J Infect Dis 1991; 163: 929–930.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pfeiffer TJ, Ellis DH. Environmental isolation of Cryptococcus neoformansvar. gattiifrom Eucalyptus tereticornis. JMed Vet Mycol 1992; 30: 407–408.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 1990; 18(22): 6531–6535.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson DE, Bennett JE, Bailey JW. Serologic grouping of Cryptococcus neoformans Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1968;127:820–823.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sriburee, P., Khayhan, S., Khamwan, C. et al. Serotype and PCR-fingerprints of Clinical and Environmental isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Mycopathologia 158, 25–31 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MYCO.0000038435.14281.f4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MYCO.0000038435.14281.f4

Navigation