Abstract
In a phenomenon called unacknowledged rape, many rape victims do not label their experience “rape.” Does their level of rape myth acceptance influence this labeling process? In this study, 86 college women whose experience met the legal definition of rape described their experience, indicated how they labeled it, and completed the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Logistic regressions indicated that, for 2 rape myths (e.g., if women don't fight back, it's not rape), women who accepted the myth and whose experience corresponded to the myth (e.g., they did not fight back) were less likely than other women to acknowledge their experience as rape. Women were also unlikely to acknowledge rape when they did not label the nonconsensual sexual behavior “sex.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bondurant, B. (2001). University women's acknowledgment of rape: Individual, situational, and social factors. Violence Against Women, 7 ,294–314.
Botta, R. A., & Pingree, S. (1997). Interpersonal communication and rape: Women acknowledge their assaults. Journal of Health Communication, 2 ,197–212.
Brener, N. D., McMahon, P. M., Warren, C. W., & Douglas, K. A. (1999). Forced sexual intercourse and associated health-risk behaviors among female college students in the United States.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67 ,252–259.
Bufkin, J., & Eschholz, S. (2000). Images of sex and rape: A content analysis of popular film. Violence Against Women, 6 ,1317–1344.
Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38 ,217–230.
Crawford, M. (1995). Talking difference: On gender and language. London: Sage.
Estrich, S. (1987). Real rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Felson, R. B. (2002). Violence and gender reexamined. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Fisher, B. S., Daigle, L. E., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G. (2003). Acknowledging sexual victimization as rape: Results from a national-level study.Justice Quarterly, 20 ,535–570.
Gagnon, J. H. (1990). The explicit and implicit use of the scripting perspective in sex research. Annual Review of Sex Research, 1 ,1–43.
Gavey, N. (1999). "I wasn't raped, but ...": Revisiting definitional problems in sexual victimization. In S. Lamb (Ed.), New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 57–81). New York: New York University Press.
Kahn, A. S., Jackson, J., Kully, C., Badger, K., & Halvorsen, J. (2003). Calling it rape: Differences in experiences of women who do and do not label their sexual assault as rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27 ,233–242.
Kahn, A. S., & Mathie, V. A. (2000). Understanding the unacknowledged rape victim. In C. B. Travis & J. W. White (Eds.), Sexuality, society, and feminism (pp. 377–403). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Kahn, A. S., Mathie, V. A., & Torgler, C. (1994). Rape scripts and rape acknowledgment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18 ,53–66.
Kan. Stat. Ann. §§21-3501-3502 (1995 & Supp. 1999).
Koss, M. P. (1985). The hidden rape victim: Personality, attitudinal, and situational characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9 ,193–212.
Koss, M. P., Dinero, T. E., Seibel, C. A., & Cox, S. L. (1988). Stranger and acquaintance rape: Are there differences in the victim's experience? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12 ,1–24.
Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. (1982). Sexual Experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50 ,455–457.
Lamb, S. (1999). Constructing the victim: Popular images and lasting labels. In S. Lamb (Ed.), New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 108–138). New York: New York University Press.
Layman, M. J., Gidycz, C. A., & Lynn, S. J. (1996). Unacknowledged versus acknowledged rape victims: Situational factors and posttraumatic stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105 ,124–131.
Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18 ,133–164.
Muehlenhard, C. L., & MacNaughton, J. S. (1988). Women's beliefs about women who “lead men on.” Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7 ,65–79.
Muehlenhard, C. L., & Quackenbush, D. M. (1998). Sexual Double Standard Scale. In C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 186–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33 ,27–68.
Pitts, M., & Rahman, Q. (2001).Which behaviors constitute “having sex” among university students in the UK? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30 ,169–176.
Ryan, K. M. (1988). Rape and seduction scripts. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12 ,237–245.
Sanders, S. A., & Reinisch, J. M. (1999). Would you say you “had sex” if ...? Journal of the American Medical Association, 281 ,275–277.
Schulhofer, S. J. (1998). Unwanted sex: The culture of intimidation and the failure of the law.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Soothill, K. (1991). The changing face of rape? British Journal of Criminology, 31 ,383–392.
Taylor, F., & Muscarella, F. (2002, November). Sexual attitudes: An examination of differences by ethnicity, gender, and year in college. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, Montreal.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women (NCJ183781). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
Valdez, B. S., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2000, May). Explaining the meaning of oral sex and intercourse.Paper presented at the Midcontinent Regional Conference of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, Little Rock, AR.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peterson, Z.D., Muehlenhard, C.L. Was It Rape? The Function of Women's Rape Myth Acceptance and Definitions of Sex in Labeling Their Own Experiences. Sex Roles 51, 129–144 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000037758.95376.00
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000037758.95376.00