Skip to main content
Log in

STUDENT JUDGMENTS ABOUT DATING VIOLENCE: A Factorial Vignette Analysis

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Survey vignette methodology was employed toinvestigate student beliefs about what constitutesabusive behaviors in dating relationships. A packet of15 unique vignettes depicting incidents that might be considered to be violent was distributed torandomly selected graduate and undergraduate studentswho were asked to rate physical abusiveness. Based onmultiple regression analysis, both contextual and student demographic characteristics were foundto influence abusiveness ratings. Significant predictorsof abuse judgments were nature of the aggressive act andvictim's gender and sexual orientation. More severe acts of aggression, female victims, gayand lesbian victims, a history of violence in therelationship, injurious outcome, male perpetrator, andalcohol consumption significantly increased abusiveness ratings. More advanced students and femalestudents tended to make higher abuse ratings, whereasbeing in a relationship was associated with lowerratings. Although both contextual and demographicfactors affected student judgments of abusiveness,student characteristics explained relatively littlebeyond what was accounted for by situational variablesin the scenarios depicted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aizenman, M., and Kelley, G. (1988). The incidence of violence and acquaintance rape in dating relationships among college men and women. Journal of College Student Development29: 305-311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias, Ileana, and Johnson, Patti Jo (1989). Evaluations of physical aggression among intimate dyads. Journal of Interpersonal Violence4: 298-307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, Libby (1992). Dating violence among high school students. Social Work37: 21-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billingham, Robert E. (1987). Courtship violence: The patterns of conflict resolution strategies across seven levels of emotional commitment. Family Relations36: 283-289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cate, Rodney M., Henton, June M., Koval, James, Christopher, F. Scott., and Lloyd, Sally (1982). Premarital abuse: A social psychological perspective. Journal of Family Issues3: 79-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comins, Catherine A. (1984). Courtship violence: A recent study and its implications for future research. Paper presented at the Second National Conference for Family Vio-lence Researchers. Durham, NH.

  • Ferraro, Kathleen J., and Johnson, John M. (1984). The meaning of courtship violence. Paper presented at the Second National Conference for Family Violence Researchers. Durham, NH.

  • Flynn, C. P. (1987). Relationship violence: A model for family professionals. Family Relations36: 295-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follingstad, Diane R., Rutledge, Larry L., Polek, Darlene S., and McNeill-Hawkins, Kay (1988). Factors associated with patterns of dating violence toward college women. Journal of Family Violence3: 169-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, Richard J., and Straus, Murray A. (1988). Intimate Violence: The Definitive Study of the Causes and Consequences of Abuse in the American Family. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henton, June, Cate, Rodney, Koval, James, Lloyd, Sally, and Christopher, Scott (1983). Romance and violence in dating relationships. Journal of Family Issues4: 467-482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Island, David, and Letellier, Patrick (1991). Men Who Beat the Men Who Love Them: Battered Gay Men and Domestic Violence. New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laner, Mary R. (1990). Violence or its precipitants: Which is more likely to be identified as a dating problem? Deviant Behavior11: 319-329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laner, Mary R., and Thompson, Jeanine (1982). Abuse and aggression in courting couples. Deviant Behavior2: 229-244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Barrie (1993). In Love and Danger: A Teen's Guide to Breaking Free of Abusive Relationships. Seattle, WA: Seal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Sally A. (1991). The darkside of courtship: Violence and sexual exploitation. Family Relations40: 14-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makepeace, James M. (1981). Courtship violence among college students. Family Rela-tions30: 97-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makepeace, James M. (1984). The severity of courtship violence injuries and individual precautionary measures. Paper presented at the Second National Conference for Fam-ily Violence Researchers. Durham, NH.

  • Makepeace, James M. (1986). Gender differences in courtship victimization. Family Relations35: 383-388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makepeace, James M. (1987). Social factor and victim-offender differences in courtship violence. Family Relations36: 87-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makepeace, James M. (1989). Dating, living together, and courtship violence. In Maureen A. Pirog-Good and Jan E. Stets (eds.), Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues(pp. 94-107). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, William J. (1984). Violence in college couples. College Student Journal2: 150-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olday, David, and Wesley, Beverly (1988). Dating violence: A comparison of high school and college subsamples. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology16: 183-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirog-Good, Maureen A., and Stets, Jan E. (1989). The help-seeking behavior of physically and sexually abused college students. In Maureen A. Pirog-Good and Jan E. Stets (eds.), Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues(pp. 108-125). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzetti, Claire (1992). Violent Betrayal: Partner Abuse in Lesbian Relationships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, David, and O' Leary, K. Daniel (1996). Aggression between heterosexual dating partners: An examination of a model of courtship aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence11: 519-540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, Bruce (1985). Courtship violence: Acceptable forms and situations. College Student Journal19: 389-393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, Bruce, and Benaske, N. (1985). Courtship violence experienced by abused wives: Similarities in patterns of abuse. Family Relations34: 419-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, Peter H., and Nock, Steven L. (1982). Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Approach. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, Linda P., Breen, Richard, and Howell, Marilyn (1988), Abuse in intimate rela-tionships: A comparison of married and dating college students. Journal of Interperso-nal Violence3: 414-429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rue, N. (1989). Coping with Dating Violence. New York: Rosen Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, Jan, and Straus, Murray (1989). The marriage license as a hitting license: A com-parison of assaults in dating, cohabiting, and married couples. Journal of Family Violence4: 33-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, Murray A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family41: 75-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, Murray A., Gelles, Richard J., and Steinmetz, Suzanne K. (1980). Behind Closed Doors. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkwein, J. Fredericks (1997). Office of Institutional Research, University at Albany, State University of New York, personal communication.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlson, B.E. STUDENT JUDGMENTS ABOUT DATING VIOLENCE: A Factorial Vignette Analysis. Research in Higher Education 40, 201–220 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018786614194

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018786614194

Keywords

Navigation