Abstract
Survey vignette methodology was employed toinvestigate student beliefs about what constitutesabusive behaviors in dating relationships. A packet of15 unique vignettes depicting incidents that might be considered to be violent was distributed torandomly selected graduate and undergraduate studentswho were asked to rate physical abusiveness. Based onmultiple regression analysis, both contextual and student demographic characteristics were foundto influence abusiveness ratings. Significant predictorsof abuse judgments were nature of the aggressive act andvictim's gender and sexual orientation. More severe acts of aggression, female victims, gayand lesbian victims, a history of violence in therelationship, injurious outcome, male perpetrator, andalcohol consumption significantly increased abusiveness ratings. More advanced students and femalestudents tended to make higher abuse ratings, whereasbeing in a relationship was associated with lowerratings. Although both contextual and demographicfactors affected student judgments of abusiveness,student characteristics explained relatively littlebeyond what was accounted for by situational variablesin the scenarios depicted.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aizenman, M., and Kelley, G. (1988). The incidence of violence and acquaintance rape in dating relationships among college men and women. Journal of College Student Development29: 305-311.
Arias, Ileana, and Johnson, Patti Jo (1989). Evaluations of physical aggression among intimate dyads. Journal of Interpersonal Violence4: 298-307.
Bergman, Libby (1992). Dating violence among high school students. Social Work37: 21-27.
Billingham, Robert E. (1987). Courtship violence: The patterns of conflict resolution strategies across seven levels of emotional commitment. Family Relations36: 283-289.
Cate, Rodney M., Henton, June M., Koval, James, Christopher, F. Scott., and Lloyd, Sally (1982). Premarital abuse: A social psychological perspective. Journal of Family Issues3: 79-90.
Comins, Catherine A. (1984). Courtship violence: A recent study and its implications for future research. Paper presented at the Second National Conference for Family Vio-lence Researchers. Durham, NH.
Ferraro, Kathleen J., and Johnson, John M. (1984). The meaning of courtship violence. Paper presented at the Second National Conference for Family Violence Researchers. Durham, NH.
Flynn, C. P. (1987). Relationship violence: A model for family professionals. Family Relations36: 295-299.
Follingstad, Diane R., Rutledge, Larry L., Polek, Darlene S., and McNeill-Hawkins, Kay (1988). Factors associated with patterns of dating violence toward college women. Journal of Family Violence3: 169-182.
Gelles, Richard J., and Straus, Murray A. (1988). Intimate Violence: The Definitive Study of the Causes and Consequences of Abuse in the American Family. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Henton, June, Cate, Rodney, Koval, James, Lloyd, Sally, and Christopher, Scott (1983). Romance and violence in dating relationships. Journal of Family Issues4: 467-482.
Island, David, and Letellier, Patrick (1991). Men Who Beat the Men Who Love Them: Battered Gay Men and Domestic Violence. New York: Haworth.
Laner, Mary R. (1990). Violence or its precipitants: Which is more likely to be identified as a dating problem? Deviant Behavior11: 319-329.
Laner, Mary R., and Thompson, Jeanine (1982). Abuse and aggression in courting couples. Deviant Behavior2: 229-244.
Levy, Barrie (1993). In Love and Danger: A Teen's Guide to Breaking Free of Abusive Relationships. Seattle, WA: Seal Press.
Lloyd, Sally A. (1991). The darkside of courtship: Violence and sexual exploitation. Family Relations40: 14-20.
Makepeace, James M. (1981). Courtship violence among college students. Family Rela-tions30: 97-102.
Makepeace, James M. (1984). The severity of courtship violence injuries and individual precautionary measures. Paper presented at the Second National Conference for Fam-ily Violence Researchers. Durham, NH.
Makepeace, James M. (1986). Gender differences in courtship victimization. Family Relations35: 383-388.
Makepeace, James M. (1987). Social factor and victim-offender differences in courtship violence. Family Relations36: 87-91.
Makepeace, James M. (1989). Dating, living together, and courtship violence. In Maureen A. Pirog-Good and Jan E. Stets (eds.), Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues(pp. 94-107). New York: Praeger.
Matthews, William J. (1984). Violence in college couples. College Student Journal2: 150-158.
Olday, David, and Wesley, Beverly (1988). Dating violence: A comparison of high school and college subsamples. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology16: 183-190.
Pirog-Good, Maureen A., and Stets, Jan E. (1989). The help-seeking behavior of physically and sexually abused college students. In Maureen A. Pirog-Good and Jan E. Stets (eds.), Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues(pp. 108-125). New York: Praeger.
Renzetti, Claire (1992). Violent Betrayal: Partner Abuse in Lesbian Relationships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Riggs, David, and O' Leary, K. Daniel (1996). Aggression between heterosexual dating partners: An examination of a model of courtship aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence11: 519-540.
Roscoe, Bruce (1985). Courtship violence: Acceptable forms and situations. College Student Journal19: 389-393.
Roscoe, Bruce, and Benaske, N. (1985). Courtship violence experienced by abused wives: Similarities in patterns of abuse. Family Relations34: 419-424.
Rossi, Peter H., and Nock, Steven L. (1982). Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Approach. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Rouse, Linda P., Breen, Richard, and Howell, Marilyn (1988), Abuse in intimate rela-tionships: A comparison of married and dating college students. Journal of Interperso-nal Violence3: 414-429.
Rue, N. (1989). Coping with Dating Violence. New York: Rosen Publishing Group.
Stets, Jan, and Straus, Murray (1989). The marriage license as a hitting license: A com-parison of assaults in dating, cohabiting, and married couples. Journal of Family Violence4: 33-51.
Straus, Murray A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family41: 75-86.
Straus, Murray A., Gelles, Richard J., and Steinmetz, Suzanne K. (1980). Behind Closed Doors. New York: Anchor Books.
Volkwein, J. Fredericks (1997). Office of Institutional Research, University at Albany, State University of New York, personal communication.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carlson, B.E. STUDENT JUDGMENTS ABOUT DATING VIOLENCE: A Factorial Vignette Analysis. Research in Higher Education 40, 201–220 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018786614194
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018786614194