Development of the Remoralization Scale
An Extension of Contemporary Psychotherapy Outcome Measurement
Abstract
Remoralization is the process of restoration of morale. Remoralization constitutes an important step in the therapeutic change process. Because no appropriate self-report instrument was available to indicate the level of morale in mental health care, the Remoralization Scale (RS) was developed. In a first study (299 outpatients), a pool of 69 items was examined to produce an initial scale with 16 items with a unidimensional factor structure. In a second study (199 outpatients, 192 nonpatients), the unidimensionality and scalar invariance of the initial scale was tested. To make the RS as short and easy to complete as possible, four items with low factor loadings were removed. In a third study (124 students), the test-retest reliability (r = 0.89) and internal consistency (α = 0.91) of the RS were estimated. In a fourth study, the construct validity of the RS was investigated using a demoralization scale (r = –.72) and scales that measure anxiety (r = –.52), depression (r = –.50), somatic symptoms (r = –.36), and social dysfunction (r = –.37). In a fifth study (23 panic outpatients), the sensitivity of the RS to therapeutic change was examined and found to be good. In closing, limitations of the RS are discussed.
References
2005). Positieve Uitkomsten Lijst (PUL). Handleiding [
(The Positive Outcome Scale (POS). Manual ]. Amsterdam: Boom Testuitgevers.1997). Global expectations of self-efficacy in the elderly: Psychometric characteristics of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 52, 239–248.
(1985). The mobility inventory for agoraphobia. Behavior Research and Therapy, 23, 35–44.
(1987). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2005). Comparison of psychosocial and physical functioning in patients with motor neuron disease and metastatic cancer. Journal of Palliative Care, 21, 173–179.
(1993). Panic disorder and agoraphobia. In , Clinical handbook of psychological disorders: A step-by-step treatment manual (2nd ed., pp. 1–47). New York: Guilford.
(1980). Nonspecific psychological distress and other dimensions of psychopathology. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 1229–1236.
(1997). Sampling hard to reach populations. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 790–797.
(1982). Subjective incompetence, the clinical hallmark of demoralization. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 23, 353–363.
(1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299.
(1974). Psychotherapy: The restoration of morale. American Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 271–274.
(1972). The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. London: Oxford University Press.
(1996). Psychotherapy practice and research: Repairing a strained relationship. American Psychologist, 51, 1007–1016.
(1995). A meta-analysis of treatment outcome for panic disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 15, 819–844.
(2002). Bern Inventory of Treatment Goals: Part 1. Development and first application of a taxonomy of treatment goal themes. Psychotherapy Research, 12, 79–99.
(1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265–275.
(2004). Methodological issues in studying psychotherapy processes and outcomes. In , Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed., pp. 84–135). New York: Wiley.
(1993). A phase model of psychotherapy outcome: Causal mediation of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 678–685.
(1999). Methods for defining and determining the clinical significance of treatment effects: Description, application, and alternatives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 300–307.
(1972). Psychotherapy and psychoanalysis: Final reports of the Menninger Foundation’s psychotherapy research project. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 36, 1–275.
(2004). The Demoralization Scale: A report of its development and preliminary validation. Journal of Palliative Care, 20, 269–276.
(1991). De General Health Questionnaire, Nederlandse bewerking [
(Dutch Adaptation ]. Lisse: Swets Test Publishers.2004). Cognitive therapy outcome: The effects of hopelessness in a naturalistic outcome study. Behavior Research and Therapy, 42, 631–646.
(2003). Multidisciplinary Guideline for anxiety disorders: Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of patients with an anxiety disorder. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Trimbos-instituut.
. (1997). The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): A short diagnostic structured interview: Reliability and validity according to the CIDI. European-Psychiatry, 12, 224–231.
(2005). Assessing demoralization and depression in the setting of medical disease. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 66, 391–394.
(2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in over-generalizing Hu and Bentler’s findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.
(1970). Personality and motivation (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
(1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.
(1991). Why study treatment outcome? Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 42, 1007–1013.
(2001). What constitutes success? The relative priority of service users’ and clinicians’ views of mental health services. British Journal of Psychiatry, 179, 9–10.
(1997). A consumer-constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 48, 1042–1047.
(1965). Society and the adolescent self-image (rev. ed.). New York: Princeton University Press.
(2009). Testing structural equation models, or detection of misspecifications. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 561–582.
(1982). The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663–671.
(1996). Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 321–335.
(1994). The person with schizophrenia as a person II: Approaches to the subjective and complex. British Journal of Psychiatry, 164(Suppl. 23), 103–107.
(2001). The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods, and findings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2001). A multidimensional meta-analysis of treatments for depression, panic, and generalized anxiety disorder: An empirical examination of the status of empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 875–899.
(